Printed Page 3520, Mar. 16
| Printed Page 3540, Mar. 16
|
Printed Page 3520, Mar. 16
| Printed Page 3540, Mar. 16
| The question then recurred to the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander, M.O. Alexander, T.C. Allison Askins Bailey, G. Baker Boan Brown, H. Cato Chamblee Clyborne Cooper Corning Davenport Fair Fulmer Gamble Gonzales Graham Hallman Harrell Harrison Haskins Holt Houck Huff Hutson Jaskwhich Jennings Keegan Kelley Kirsh Klauber Koon Lanford Law Littlejohn Marchbanks McLeod Meacham Moody-Lawrence Phillips Quinn Richardson Riser
Robinson Shissias Simrill Smith, D. Smith, R. Spearman Stoddard Stone Sturkie Trotter Vaughn Waldrop Walker Wilder, D. Wilkes Wilkins Witherspoon Wofford Worley Wright Young, A.
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bailey, J. Baxley Breeland Brown, G. Brown, J. Byrd Canty Carnell Cobb-Hunter Cromer Delleney Elliott Farr Govan Harrelson Harris, J. Harris, P. Hines Inabinett Kennedy Keyserling Kinon Martin McAbee McCraw McElveen McMahand McTeer Neal Neilson Rudnick Scott Sheheen Snow Stille Thomas Townsend Tucker Waites Whipper White
So, the amendment was adopted.
Rep. CLYBORNE moved to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 55 was adopted.
Rep. WILKINS moved to table the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Rep. GONZALES proposed the following Amendment No. 64 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3287HTC.94), which was adopted.
Amend the report of the Committee on Ways and Means, as and if amended, SECTION 2, page 4633-3, by striking lines 19 through 23 and inserting:
Amend further, page 4633-3, by striking lines 28 and 29 and inserting:
/(2)(a) spending of fee revenues generated by income-producing services first extended to customers in the current fiscal year;
(b) spending of fee revenues generated by facilities which charge admission or rental fees;/
Amend further, SECTION 3, page 4633-4, by striking lines 4 through 7 and inserting:
/Total municipal spending in the prior fiscal year does not include spending pursuant to items (2)(b), (3), (4), (5), and (6) of this section. Total spending by a municipal government for purposes of this limitation is the total of a municipal government spending in a fiscal year from all sources of funds and for all purposes, but total municipal government spending for the current fiscal year does not include:/
Amend further, page 4633-4, by striking lines 13 and 14 and inserting:
/(2)(a) spending of fee revenues generated by income-producing services first extended to customers in the current fiscal year;
(b) spending of fee revenues generated by facilities which charge admission or rental fees;/
Amend further, SECTION 4, page 4633-4, by striking lines 32 through 36 and inserting:
/of Labor Statistics of the United State Department of Labor. Total district spending in the prior fiscal year does not include spending pursuant to items (2)(b), 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this section. Total spending by a special purpose or public service district for purposes of this limitation is the total of special purpose or public service district spending in a fiscal year from all sources of funds and for all purposes, but does not include for the current fiscal year:/
Amend further, SECTION 4, page 4633-4, by striking lines 41 and 42 and inserting:
/(2)(a) spending of fee revenues generated by income-producing services first extended to customers in the current fiscal year;
(b) spending of fee revenues generated by facilities which charge admissions or rental fees;/
Amend further, SECTION 5, page 4633-5, by striking line 14 and inserting:
Amend title to conform.
Rep. GONZALES explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The motion of Rep. PHILLIPS to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 58 was rejected was taken up and agreed to by a division vote of 60 to 43.
Reps. RICHARDSON and GONZALES spoke against the amendment.
Rep. KENNEDY spoke in favor of the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
Rep. WHITE demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander, M.O. Alexander, T.C. Allison Askins Bailey, G. Barber Baxley Beatty Boan Breeland Brown, G. Brown, J. Byrd Canty Chamblee Cobb-Hunter Corning Elliott Farr Felder Govan Harrelson Harris, J. Harris, P. Harwell Haskins Hines Hodges Holt Houck Hutson Inabinett Jennings Kennedy Keyserling Kinon Littlejohn McAbee McCraw McElveen McKay McMahand McTeer Neal Phillips Rhoad Rogers Rudnick Scott Sheheen Snow Spearman Thomas Townsend Tucker Vaughn Waites Waldrop Whipper White
Wilder, D. Wilder, J. Wilkes Wilkins
Those who voted in the negative are:
Brown, H. Carnell Cato Clyborne Cromer Davenport Fair Fulmer Gamble Gonzales Graham Hallman Harrell Harrison Huff Jaskwhich Keegan Kelley Kirsh Klauber Koon Lanford Law Marchbanks Meacham Moody-Lawrence Quinn Richardson Riser Robinson Shissias Simrill Smith, D. Smith, R. Stille Stone Stuart Trotter Walker Witherspoon Wofford Wright Young, A. Young, R.
So, the amendment was adopted.
Rep. RUDNICK proposed the following Amendment No. 65 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5687HTC.94), which was tabled.
Amend the Report of the Committee on Ways and Means, as and if amended, by striking /two-thirds/ and inserting /three-fifths/ on page 4633-3, line 37; on page 4633-4, line 22; and on page 4633-5, on lines 5 and 24.
Amend title to conform.
Rep. HUFF moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 59 to 28.
Rep. NEAL proposed the following Amendment No. 66 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5669HTC.94), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
"( ) an amount of the fair market value of real property qualifying as a legal residence pursuant to Section 12-43-220(C) attributable to reassessments occurring after the year the current owner acquired the property. This exemption does not apply to increases attributable to improvements. For purposes of this item, improvements do not include routine maintenance or improvements made to make more habitable an existing structure.
( ) an amount of the fair market value of not more than one hundred acres of unimproved real property owned by individuals attributable to reassessments occurring after the year the current owners acquired the property. This exemption applies only to unimproved real property which is not classified as agricultural real property and any improvements on the real property voids the exemption for the current owner for succeeding property tax years. An intrafamily transfer of less than one hundred percent of the ownership of the property does not constitute new ownership for purposes of this exemption."
(B) This section takes effect January 1, 1995, and applies only with respect to increases in fair market attributable to countywide reassessment programs occurring after 1994./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.
Rep. NEAL explained the amendment.
Rep. BOAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. NEAL demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander, M.O. Alexander, T.C. Allison Askins Baker Baxley Boan Carnell Cato Chamblee Cooper Fair Farr Felder Fulmer Gamble Gonzales Graham Hallman Harris, J. Harris, P. Harwell Hodges Holt Houck Huff Hutson
Jennings Keegan Kelley Kinon Kirsh Klauber Littlejohn Marchbanks Martin Mattos McAbee McCraw McKay McTeer Meacham Phillips Rhoad Riser Sheheen Simrill Smith, R. Stoddard Stone Trotter Tucker Vaughn Waites Waldrop Walker Wilder, D. Wilder, J. Wright Young, A.
Those who voted in the negative are:
Barber Beatty Breeland Brown, G. Brown, H. Brown, J. Byrd Canty Cobb-Hunter Davenport Delleney Govan Harrell Harrelson Haskins Hines Inabinett Jaskwhich Kennedy Keyserling Law McElveen McLeod McMahand Moody-Lawrence Neal Neilson Richardson Robinson Rudnick Scott Smith, D. Spearman Stille Stuart Whipper White Wofford
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 69 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5680HTC.94), which was rejected.
Amend the Report of the Committee on Ways and Means, as and if amended, SECTION 2, page 4633-3, after line 38, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) spending for economic development purposes./
Amend further, SECTION 3, page 4633-4, after line 23, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
Amend further, SECTION 4, page 4633-5, after line 6, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) spending for economic development purposes./
Renumber to conform.
Amend title to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER was recognized.
Rep. CORNING moved to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 58 was adopted and the motion was noted.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. GONZALES moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Brown, H. Cato Chamblee Clyborne Cooper Fair Fulmer Gamble Gonzales Graham Harrell Harris, P. Harrison Haskins Holt Huff Hutson Jaskwhich Keegan Kelley Kirsh Klauber Koon Littlejohn Marchbanks Meacham Quinn Riser Robinson Shissias Simrill Smith, D. Smith, R. Stille Stone Townsend Trotter Vaughn Walker Wilkins Witherspoon Wofford Wright Young, A.
Alexander, M.O. Askins Barber Baxley Beatty Boan Breeland Brown, G. Brown, J. Byrd Canty Carnell Cobb-Hunter Corning Cromer Davenport Elliott Farr Felder Govan Harrelson Harris, J. Harwell Hines Houck Inabinett Jennings Kennedy Keyserling Kinon Martin Mattos McAbee McCraw McElveen McKay McLeod McMahand McTeer Moody-Lawrence Neal Neilson Phillips Richardson Rogers Rudnick Scott Sheheen Spearman Stoddard Stuart Thomas Tucker Waites Whipper White Wilder, J. Wilkes Worley
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
Rep. GONZALES spoke against the amendment.
The SPEAKER granted Reps. CANTY and McMAHAND a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HASKINS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. CLYBORNE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. GAMBLE raised the Point of Order that one hour had not elapsed since a similar motion was made, which point was sustained by the Chair.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander, T.C. Askins Bailey, G. Bailey, J. Baxley Beatty Boan Breeland Brown, G. Byrd Carnell Cobb-Hunter Delleney Elliott Farr Felder Govan Harrelson Harris, J. Harris, P. Hines Hodges Houck Inabinett Jennings Kennedy Keyserling Martin McAbee McCraw McElveen McLeod McMahand McTeer Moody-Lawrence Neal Neilson Phillips Rhoad Richardson Rudnick Sheheen Snow Spearman Stille Stoddard Thomas Tucker Waites Walker Whipper White Wilder, J. Wilkes
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Baker Barber Brown, H. Cato Chamblee Clyborne Cooper Corning Cromer Davenport Fair Fulmer Gamble Gonzales Graham Hallman Harrell Harrison Haskins Holt Huff Hutson Jaskwhich Keegan Kelley Kirsh Klauber Koon Lanford Law Littlejohn Marchbanks Mattos McKay Meacham Quinn Riser Robinson Shissias Simrill Smith, D.
Smith, R. Stone Stuart Townsend Trotter Vaughn Waldrop Wilder, D. Wilkins Witherspoon Wofford Worley Wright Young, A.
So, the amendment was rejected.
Printed Page 3520, Mar. 16
| Printed Page 3540, Mar. 16
|