Journal of the House of Representatives
of the First Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 2730, Apr. 26 | Printed Page 2750, Apr. 26 |

Printed Page 2740 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

Amend title to conform.

Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10113JM.95), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:

/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three nine hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/

Amend title to conform.

Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

Rep. BAXLEY spoke against the Bill and moved to table the Bill.

Rep. CATO demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 26; Nays 72

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Anderson         Baxley           Breeland
Cave             Clyburn          Delleney
Govan            Harris, J.       Harrison
Hines            Howard           Inabinett
Jennings         Lloyd            Martin
McMahand         Moody-Lawrence   Neal
Rogers           Scott            Sheheen


Printed Page 2741 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

Thomas           Whipper, L.      Whipper, S.
White            Williams

Total--26

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison          Askins           Bailey
Brown, G.        Brown, H.        Cain
Carnell          Cato             Chamblee
Cooper           Cotty            Cromer
Dantzler         Davenport        Easterday
Elliott          Fair             Fleming
Fulmer           Gamble           Hallman
Harrell          Harvin           Herdklotz
Hodges           Hutson           Keegan
Kelley           Keyserling       Kinon
Kirsh            Knotts           Koon
Lanford          Law              Limbaugh
Limehouse        Littlejohn       Marchbanks
Mason            McCraw           Meacham
Neilson          Phillips         Quinn
Rhoad            Rice             Richardson
Riser            Robinson         Sandifer
Seithel          Sharpe           Shissias
Simrill          Smith, D.        Smith, R.
Spearman         Stille           Stuart
Townsend         Tucker           Vaughn
Waldrop          Walker           Whatley
Wilder           Wilkins          Witherspoon
Wofford          Wright           Young, A.

Total--72

So, the House refused to table the Bill.

The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill on second reading.

Pursuant to Rule 7.7 the yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 78; Nays 17



Printed Page 2742 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison          Askins           Bailey
Brown, G.        Brown, H.        Cain
Carnell          Cato             Chamblee
Cooper           Cotty            Cromer
Dantzler         Davenport        Easterday
Elliott          Fair             Fleming
Fulmer           Gamble           Hallman
Harrell          Harvin           Herdklotz
Hodges           Hutson           Inabinett
Keegan           Kelley           Keyserling
Kinon            Kirsh            Klauber
Knotts           Koon             Lanford
Law              Limbaugh         Limehouse
Littlejohn       Marchbanks       Mason
McCraw           McMahand         Meacham
Neilson          Phillips         Quinn
Rhoad            Rice             Richardson
Riser            Robinson         Sandifer
Seithel          Sheheen          Shissias
Simrill          Smith, D.        Smith, R.
Spearman         Stille           Stuart
Thomas           Townsend         Tucker
Vaughn           Waldrop          Walker
Whatley          Whipper, S.      Wilder
Wilkins          Witherspoon      Wofford
Wright           Young, A.        Young, J.

Total--78

Those who voted in the negative are:

Anderson         Baxley           Breeland
Brown, J.        Cave             Clyburn
Delleney         Harris, J.       Harrison
Jennings         Lloyd            Martin
Neal             Scott            Whipper, L.
White            Williams

Total--17

So, the Bill was read the second time and ordered to third reading.


Printed Page 2743 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

RECORD FOR JOURNAL

I was out of the chamber when H. 3838 was voted on. I would like for my vote to be recorded in the affirmative Yes.

Rep. HAROLD G. WORLEY

STATEMENT FOR HOUSE JOURNAL

ABSTENTION FROM VOTING

BASED ON POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced bill or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date.

Bill #: H. 3838 General Subject Matter: Workers' Comp

The reason for abstaining on the above reference legislation is:

A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.

Rep. THOMAS E. HUFF

STATEMENT FOR HOUSE JOURNAL

ABSTENTION FROM VOTING

BASED ON POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced bill or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date.

Bill #: H. 3838 General Subject Matter: Workers' Comp

The reason for abstaining on the above reference legislation is:

A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.

Rep. TERRY E. HASKINS

H. 3549--RECOMMITTED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3549 -- Rep. Sharpe: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 44-56-60, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS AND PERMIT


Printed Page 2744 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

ISSUANCE UNDER THE "SOUTH CAROLINA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT", SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CLEAN-UP COSTS AND RESTORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAIRMENT ARISING FROM A FACILITY.

Rep. SHARPE moved to recommit the Bill to the Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs, which was agreed to.

MOTION REJECTED

Rep. SHARPE moved that the House recur to the morning hour, which was rejected.

Rep. SCOTT moved that the House do now adjourn.

Rep. HUFF demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 25; Nays 71

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Anderson         Bailey           Breeland
Carnell          Cave             Chamblee
Cobb-Hunter      Hines            Hodges
Klauber          Lloyd            Martin
McMahand         Moody-Lawrence   Neal
Phillips         Rhoad            Rogers
Scott            Sheheen          Waldrop
Whipper, L.      Whipper, S.      White
Williams

Total--25

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison          Askins           Baxley
Brown, G.        Brown, H.        Cain
Cato             Cooper           Cotty
Cromer           Dantzler         Davenport
Delleney         Easterday        Elliott
Fair             Fulmer           Gamble
Hallman          Harrell          Harris, J.


Printed Page 2745 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

Harrison         Harvin           Haskins
Herdklotz        Huff             Hutson
Inabinett        Jennings         Keegan
Kelley           Kinon            Kirsh
Knotts           Koon             Lanford
Law              Limbaugh         Limehouse
Littlejohn       Marchbanks       Mason
McCraw           Meacham          Neilson
Rice             Richardson       Riser
Robinson         Sandifer         Seithel
Sharpe           Shissias         Simrill
Smith, D.        Smith, R.        Spearman
Stille           Stuart           Thomas
Townsend         Vaughn           Walker
Whatley          Wilder           Wilkins
Witherspoon      Wofford          Worley
Wright           Young, A.

Total--71

So, the House refused to adjourn.

H. 3599--INTERRUPTED DEBATE

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3599 -- Rep. Richardson: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 42-1-360, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE EXEMPTION OF CASUAL EMPLOYEES AND CERTAIN OTHER EMPLOYMENTS FROM TITLE 42, WORKERS' COMPENSATION, SO AS TO ADD TO THE LIST OF SUCH EXEMPTIONS EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE LONGSHORE & HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT.

Rep. BREELAND proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10218JM.95), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION 1. Any employer or workers' compensation carrier who takes credit for benefits paid under Title 42 of the 1976 Code pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 903(e) shall reimburse the employer or carrier who originally


Printed Page 2746 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

paid the benefits under Title 42 in the same amount as the credit taken plus simple interest at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. 1961(a).

SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. BREELAND explained the amendment.

Rep. RICHARDSON moved to table the amendment.

Rep. BREELAND demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 30 to 20.

RECURRENCE TO THE MORNING HOUR

Rep. HARRISON moved that the House recur to the morning hour, which was agreed to by a division vote of 63 to 14.

Further proceedings were interrupted by the House recurring to the morning hour, the pending question being consideration of the Bill.

INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

The following Bills were introduced, read the first time, and referred to appropriate committees:

S. 397 -- Senator Ryberg: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 61-1-105, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH A PARTIAL REFUND IS ALLOWED OF A LICENSED BEER, WINE, OR ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR LICENSE OR PERMIT FEE, SO AS TO PROVIDE A PARTIAL REFUND FOR ANY REASON WHICH RESULTED IN THE CLOSE OF THE LICENSED OR PERMITTED ESTABLISHMENT DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF THE BIENNIAL PERIOD AND TO PROVIDE FOR SUCH REFUNDS FOR BIENNIAL LICENSES OR PERMITS ISSUED AFTER JUNE 30, 1992.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

S. 696 -- Education Committee: A BILL TO AMEND TITLE 59, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO EDUCATION, BY ADDING CHAPTER 142 SO AS TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA NEED-BASED GRANT PROGRAM WHERE QUALIFYING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN A PUBLIC OR INDEPENDENT INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING IN THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MAY RECEIVE STATE GRANTS


Printed Page 2747 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

FOR TUITION AND FEES AT THESE INSTITUTIONS, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROCEDURES FOR THESE NEED-BASED GRANTS.

Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works.

H. 3584--POINT OF ORDER

Debate was resumed on the following Bill, the pending question being the consideration of Amendment No. 1, Rep. JASKWHICH having the floor.

H. 3584 -- Reps. Allison and Townsend: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-19-25 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING IN 1995 MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS MUST BE ELECTED IN NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS ON THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY IN NOVEMBER, TO PROVIDE FOR CURRENT MEMBERS TO SERVE UNTIL THEIR SUCCESSORS ARE ELECTED AND QUALIFY, TO PROVIDE FOR THE METHOD OF NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES, FILLING OF VACANCIES, AND CONDUCT OF THE ELECTIONS, AND TO PROHIBIT CANDIDATES FOR SUCH OFFICES FROM REQUESTING OR ACCEPTING CONTRIBUTIONS FROM POLITICAL PARTIES OR FROM SUGGESTING POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION ON CAMPAIGN LITERATURE.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. ALLISON made the Point of Order that the Bill was improperly before the House for consideration since printed copies of the Bill have not been upon the desks of the members for one day.

The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

H. 3905--POINT OF ORDER

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3905 -- Reps. Wright, Quinn and Riser: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-63-45 SO AS TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE FOR REIMBURSING A SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR COSTS TO THE DISTRICT OF EDUCATING A CHILD NOT A RESIDENT OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HE ATTENDS.


Printed Page 2748 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. TOWNSEND made the Point of Order that the Bill was improperly before the House for consideration since printed copies of the Bill have not been upon the desks of the members for one day.

The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

S. 46--POINT OF ORDER

The following Bill was taken up.

S. 46 -- Senators Jackson, Elliott, Rose and Washington: A BILL TO AMEND SECTIONS 20-7-2730, 20-7-2740, 20-7-2800, 20-7-2810, 20-7-2850, AND 20-7-2900, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES FOR PRIVATE DAY CARE CENTERS AND RENEWAL THEREOF, APPROVAL OF PUBLIC DAY CARE CENTERS AND RENEWAL THEREOF, THE REGISTRATION OF OPERATORS OF FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, AND THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES FOR OR THE REGISTERING OF CHURCH DAY CARE CENTERS, SO AS TO REQUIRE THAT ALL PERSONS APPLYING FOR A LICENSE AS AN OPERATOR OF OR AN EMPLOYEE AT DAY CARE FACILITIES MUST UNDERGO A FINGERPRINT REVIEW TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND TO PROHIBIT THE ISSUANCE OF DAY CARE LICENSES IF SUCH OPERATORS OR EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF CERTAIN CRIMES AND TO AMEND CHAPTER 7 OF TITLE 20 BY ADDING SECTION 20-7-2720, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION MAY NOT CHARGE MORE THAN TEN DOLLARS FOR STATE BACKGROUND CHECKS REQUIRED FOR CHILD CARE FACILITIES.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. HERDKLOTZ made the Point of Order that the Bill was improperly before the House for consideration since printed copies of the Bill have not been upon the desks of the members for one day.

The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

S. 602--POINT OF ORDER

The following Bill was taken up.

S. 602 -- Senators Short, Jackson, Gregory and Giese: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 34-29-100, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH


Printed Page 2749 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO RECORDS AND REPORTS OF RESTRICTED LENDERS, BY ADDING INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE REPORTED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT MADE BY RESTRICTED LENDERS; TO AMEND SECTION 34-29-140 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO CHARGES PERMITTED TO RESTRICTED LENDERS, SO AS TO REVISE THE FINANCE CHARGES AND TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON LOAN RENEWALS; TO AMEND SECTION 37-1-301 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION CODE, SO AS TO ADD A DEFINITION FOR "DEBT COLLECTOR"; TO AMEND SECTION 37-1-303 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE INDEX OF DEFINITIONS IN TITLE 37, SO AS TO ADD "DEBT COLLECTOR"; TO AMEND SECTION 37-3-201 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO LOAN FINANCE CHARGES FOR SUPERVISED LOANS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT SUPERVISED LOANS NOT EXCEEDING SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 34-29-140 RELATING TO FINANCE CHARGES FOR RESTRICTED LOANS; TO AMEND SECTION 37-3-305 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE POSTING AND FILING OF MAXIMUM RATE SCHEDULES BY SUPERVISED LENDERS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT FOR LOANS NOT EXCEEDING SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS, A RATE MAY NOT BE POSTED WHICH EXCEEDS THE CHARGES IMPOSED IN SECTION 34-29-140; TO AMEND SECTION 37-3-505 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO RECORDS AND ANNUAL REPORTS FOR SUPERVISED LENDERS, SO AS TO ADD INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT OF SUPERVISED LENDERS; TO AMEND PART 5, CHAPTER 3, TITLE 37 OF THE 1976 CODE, BY ADDING SECTION 37-3-515 SO AS TO PROVIDE A LIMITATION ON LOAN RENEWALS; TO AMEND SECTION 37-5-108 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO UNCONSCIONABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION CODE, BY ADDING PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH CONSTITUTE UNCONSCIONABILITY AND PROVIDING REMEDIES; TO AMEND SECTION 37-6-117 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, SO AS TO REQUIRE THE ADMINISTRATION TO DEVISE A PAMPHLET FOR DISTRIBUTION TO CERTAIN CONSUMERS INFORMING THEM OF THEIR RIGHTS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 37-9-102 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE LICENSURE
Printed Page 2750 . . . . . Wednesday, April 26, 1995

ELECTION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN SUPERVISED LENDERS MAY ELECT TO BE RESTRICTED LENDERS.


| Printed Page 2730, Apr. 26 | Printed Page 2750, Apr. 26 |

Page Finder Index