Printed Page 1240, Feb. 29
| Printed Page 1260, Feb. 29
|
Printed Page 1240, Feb. 29
| Printed Page 1260, Feb. 29
| /The Department is authorized to pay the Juvenile Justice Parole Board member up to $200 per day for services rendered to the agency in the performance of their official duties. The total amount of agency funds which can be utilized in this manner cannot exceed $48,000 per year/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Section 43 as amended was adopted.
The motion of Rep. H. BROWN to reconsider the vote whereby Section 63 was adopted was taken up and agreed to.
Rep. H. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 167 (Doc Name P:\amend\dc.90), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 63, Department of Revenue, page 478, line 19, Paragraph 4, by deleting the paragraph in its entirety and inserting a new paragraph to read / (DOR: Bingo and Video Poker Revenue) As to revenue derived from the provisions of Chapter 12, Title 21, which is collected from bingo, the Department of Revenue and Taxation may withhold from the General Fund portion of this revenue, the actual costs of Bingo audit activity and of criminal record checks pursuant to the evaluation of applications for bingo licenses. As to revenue derived in accordance with S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-21-2720 (3), the Department of Revenue may withhold the actual costs, not to exceed $250,000 per fiscal year, of video game machine audit activity by agents of the Department of Revenue. Any winnings resulting from these activities must be deposited to the General Fund. The Department, annually, shall make a report to the Governor and General Assembly outlining the collection activities as a result of this proviso. This proviso will expire June 30, 1999/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Section 63 as amended was adopted.
The motion of Rep. H. BROWN to reconsider the vote whereby Section 33 was adopted was taken up and agreed to.
Rep. H. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 242 (Doc Name P:\amend\pfm\8068HTC.96), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, SECTION 33, page 540, line 25, by striking /Comptroller General/ and inserting /Department of Revenue and Taxation/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Section 33 as amended was adopted.
Rep. KIRSH proposed the following Amendment No. 32 (Doc Name P:\amend\JIC\5314CM.96), which was ruled out of order.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, Permanent Provisions, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
TO AMEND SECTION 12-21-3320, AS AMENDED, OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO REGULATION OF BINGO GAMES AND DEFINITIONS, SO AS TO REVISE THE DEFINITION OF "NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION".
Section 12-21-3320(5) of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 188 of 1989, is amended to read:
"(5) `Nonprofit organization' means an organization entity which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, or fraternal purposes which is exempt from federal income taxes pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), 501(c)(8), or 501(c)(10), or 501(c)(19)."/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. KIRSH explained the amendment.
Rep. SHEHEEN raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 32 was out of order as it was not germane.
Rep. KIRSH argued contra the Point.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order and ruled the amendment out of order.
Rep. STILLE moved to reconsider the vote whereby Section 21 was adopted.
Rep. HARRELL moved to table the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Rep. STILLE moved to reconsider the vote whereby Section 22 was adopted.
Rep. HARRELL moved to table the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Reps. FULMER and ROBINSON proposed the following Amendment No. 259 (Doc Name P:\amend\PFM\8086JM.96), which was ruled out of order.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
TO REQUIRE CERTAIN STATE OFFICERS TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED SALE OR LEASE BETWEEN THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND COLUMBIA/HCA, AND TO PROVIDE FOR RELATED MATTERS.
The members of the State Budget and Control Board, the Joint Bond Review Committee or the Capital Projects Oversight Committee, the Commission on Higher Education, and the board of the Medical University of South Carolina, shall review the proposed sale or lease between the Medical University of South Carolina and Columbia/HCA and shall forward the proposed contracts for the sale or lease and their respective recommendations to the General Assembly which has thirty legislative days from the receipt of these recommendations to review the proposal. After the thirty legislative days and if recommended by the State Budget and Control Board, the Joint Bond Review Committee or the Capital Projects Oversight Committee, the Commission on Higher Education, and the board of the Medical University of South Carolina, the sale or lease of MUSC facilities to Columbia/HCA shall occur unless the General Assembly, by joint resolution, has disapproved the sale or lease, or both. For purposes of this paragraph, only those calendar days occurring during a regular session of the General Assembly, excluding local days and special sessions, are included in computing the thirty legislative days. All assets and liabilities of the Medical University of South Carolina and the Medical University of South Carolina Hospital and
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. FELDER explained the amendment.
Rep. SHEHEEN raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 259 was out of order as the section had already been clinched.
Rep. FELDER argued contra the Point.
Rep. SHEHEEN stated that the amendment contradicted Rep. SEITHEL's earlier amendment.
The SPEAKER stated that the amendments dealt with the same subject matter but that it was a different approval process.
Rep. KLAUBER stated that the difference from his Point of Order raised on his amendment earlier was that his was on the same section.
The SPEAKER stated that the section had been clinched and he sustained the Point of Order and ruled the amendment out of order.
Rep. ROBINSON moved to reconsider the vote whereby Section 19 was adopted.
Rep. HARRELL moved to table the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Rep. H. BROWN moved to table all pending motions to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Rep. H. BROWN gave notice of offering amendments on third reading.
The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill, as amended, on second reading.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Askins Breeland Brown, H. Brown, J. Brown, T. Byrd Cain Cato Chamblee Clyburn Cotty Cromer Dantzler Davenport Delleney Easterday Fleming Fulmer Gamble Hallman Harrell Harris, J. Harrison Haskins Herdklotz Hines, J. Jennings Keegan Kelley Keyserling Kinon Kirsh Klauber Knotts Koon Lanford Law Lee Limehouse Littlejohn Lloyd Loftis Marchbanks Mason McCraw McKay McMahand McTeer Meacham Moody-Lawrence Neilson Phillips Quinn Rhoad Rice Richardson Riser Robinson Sandifer Scott Seithel Sharpe Shissias Simrill Smith, R. Spearman Stoddard Stuart Thomas Townsend Tripp Trotter Vaughn Walker Wells Whatley Wilder Wilkins Witherspoon Wofford Worley Young Young-Brickell
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Baxley Brown, G. Canty Cave Cobb-Hunter Govan Harvin Hodges Howard Hutson Limbaugh
Neal Rogers Sheheen Smith, D. Stille Whipper, S. White Wilkes
So, the Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
I voted in opposition to this year's budget bill because it contains provisions that are inconsistent with my views on home rule and the ability of our local governments to handle their own fiscal affairs.
Rep. C. ALEX HARVIN III
We voted against the Appropriations Bill because it failed to include funding for full-day kindergarten, failed to address the basic education needs of the State, failed to provide for a reasonable employee raise, and imposed unreasonable restrictions on the power of local governments. This bill failed to address the most important priorities facing our State.
Rep. JAMES H. HODGES
Rep. TIMOTHY C. WILKES
Rep. GRADY A. BROWN
While I support much of what is contained in the Appropriations Bill, I cannot justify the seemingly never ending trend of spending more and more of taxpayer money on state government.
Rep. L. HUNTER LIMBAUGH
I voted for H. 4600, notwithstanding my concern about the growth of state spending. H. 4600 represents spending on some very good programs. However, it is my desire that we move more toward some form of "zero-based" budgeting so that we can do a better job of spending tax dollars and, hopefully, return more money to the taxpayers.
Rep. ALFRED B. ROBINSON, JR.
Once again I have chosen to vote against the budget as it requires spending more money than ever before. This seems inappropriate. We need to be cutting the size of government.
I support many of the concepts included in the budget, such as the caps on local government and the two-thirds voting requirement for all levels of government including the General Assembly.
Rep. DOUG SMITH
Had I been in the chambers, I would have voted for the 1996-97 budget, H. 4600. Due to health reasons, I had to leave before the final vote. If I could, I would like to be recorded in the Journal as being in favor of the budget.
Rep. DAVE C. WALDROP, JR.
I have a speaking engagement in Charleston at 7:30 P.M., so I had to leave the House Chambers at 5:15 P.M. I would have voted for second reading passage of the budget bill had I been present.
Rep. DAVID A. WRIGHT
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part 1A, Part 1B and Part II, Section Number(s) 56, 57, 58, 65, 55, 42, 63, 5, 4A
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. J. MICHAEL BAXLEY
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. HARRY F. CATO
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA, Section Number(s) 68B
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. HARRY F. CATO
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part II, Section Number(s) 11
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business
Rep. GILDA COBB-HUNTER
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA, Section Number(s) 29
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. GILDA COBB-HUNTER
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA, Section Number(s) 30
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. GILDA COBB-HUNTER
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA, Section Number(s) 31
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
Rep. GILDA COBB-HUNTER
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA, Section Number(s) 35
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. GILDA COBB-HUNTER
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced
Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal
noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part 1A, Part 1B and Part II, Section Number(s) 4a, 5, 39, 34, 55, 42, 56, 57, 11, 58, 65, 63,
62
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual
Printed Page 1240, Feb. 29
| Printed Page 1260, Feb. 29
|