Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 9, 1996

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 2330, Apr. 17 | Printed Page 2350, Apr. 17 |

Printed Page 2340 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

H. 4586--COMMITTED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 4586 -- Rep. Kelley: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 8-17-375 SO AS TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEES EXEMPTED FROM THE GENERAL STATE EMPLOYEES GRIEVANCE PROCESS; BY ADDING SECTION 57-1-360 SO AS TO DIRECT THE COMMISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO FOSTER THE CREATION OF PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS AND TO REQUIRE ANNUAL PROGRAM REPORTS; TO AMEND SECTION 8-17-370, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO STATE EMPLOYEES EXEMPT FROM THE EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE PROCESS, SO AS TO EXEMPT VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SECTION 57-3-20, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO DIVISION DEPUTY DIRECTORS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SO AS TO REQUIRE A FUTURE APPOINTEE TO THE POSITION OF DIVISION DEPUTY FOR CONSTRUCTION,


Printed Page 2341 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

ENGINEERING, AND PLANNING TO BE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.

Rep. WRIGHT proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (Doc Name P:\amend\JIC\5803HTC.96).

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Section 8-17-370, as contained in SECTION 3, page 2, by striking lines 31 and 32, and inserting:

/engineers, or both;

(iii) transportation planners as classified by the State Budget and Control Board; and

(iv) all resident maintenance engineers and all resident construction engineers not otherwise exempted by this item./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. WRIGHT explained the amendment.

Rep. KELLY spoke in favor of the amendment.

Reps. L. WHIPPER, SCOTT and NEAL spoke against the amendment.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. FLEMING a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.

Rep. NEAL continued speaking.

Rep. QUINN moved to commit the Bill to the Judiciary Committee.

Rep. STILLE moved to table the motion.

Rep. SCOTT demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 52; Nays 59

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison              Brown, H.            Cain
Carnell              Cato                 Chamblee
Cooper               Cotty                Dantzler
Davenport            Easterday            Fleming
Fulmer               Gamble               Harrell
Haskins              Hutson               Jaskwhich
Jennings             Keegan               Kelley
Klauber              Lanford              Law
Limbaugh             Limehouse            Littlejohn

Printed Page 2342 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

Loftis               Marchbanks           Martin
McKay                Meacham              Rice
Richardson           Robinson             Sandifer
Sharpe               Simrill              Smith, D.
Stille               Thomas               Townsend
Tripp                Trotter              Vaughn
Walker               Whatley              Wilkins
Witherspoon          Wofford              Worley
Young-Brickell

Total--52

Those who voted in the negative are:

Anderson             Askins               Bailey
Baxley               Boan                 Breeland
Brown, G.            Brown, J.            Brown, T.
Cave                 Clyburn              Cobb-Hunter
Cromer               Delleney             Govan
Hallman              Harris, J.           Harrison
Harvin               Hines, J.            Hines, M.
Hodges               Howard               Inabinett
Kinon                Kirsh                Koon
Lee                  Lloyd                Mason
McAbee               McCraw               McMahand
McTeer               Moody-Lawrence       Neal
Neilson              Phillips             Quinn
Rhoad                Riser                Rogers
Scott                Seithel              Sheheen
Shissias             Smith, R.            Stoddard
Stuart               Tucker               Waldrop
Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.          White
Wilder               Wilkes               Williams
Wright               Young                

Total--59

So, the House refused to table the motion to commit.

The question then recurred to the motion to commit the Bill to the Judiciary Committee.


Printed Page 2343 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

Rep. RICE demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 63; Nays 43

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Anderson             Askins               Bailey
Baxley               Boan                 Breeland
Brown, G.            Brown, J.            Brown, T.
Carnell              Cave                 Clyburn
Cobb-Hunter          Cromer               Davenport
Delleney             Govan                Hallman
Harris, J.           Harrison             Harvin
Hines, J.            Hines, M.            Hodges
Howard               Inabinett            Jennings
Keyserling           Kinon                Kirsh
Koon                 Lee                  Lloyd
Martin               McCraw               McMahand
McTeer               Moody-Lawrence       Neal
Neilson              Phillips             Quinn
Rhoad                Riser                Rogers
Scott                Seithel              Sharpe
Sheheen              Shissias             Smith, R.
Stoddard             Stuart               Tucker
Waldrop              Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.
White                Wilder               Wilkes
Williams             Wright               Young

Total--63

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Brown, H.            Cain
Cato                 Chamblee             Cooper
Cotty                Dantzler             Easterday
Gamble               Harrell              Haskins
Hutson               Jaskwhich            Keegan
Kelley               Klauber              Lanford
Law                  Limbaugh             Limehouse
Littlejohn           Loftis               Marchbanks
Mason                McKay                Meacham
Rice                 Richardson           Robinson
Sandifer             Simrill              Smith, D.

Printed Page 2344 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

Stille               Thomas               Townsend
Tripp                Trotter              Vaughn
Walker               Whatley              Wilkins
Witherspoon          Wofford              Worley
Young-Brickell       

Total--46

So, the motion to commit was agreed to.

H. 3812--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3812 -- Reps. Limbaugh, Tripp, Mason, McElveen, Herdklotz, Knotts, Cain, Dantzler, J. Young, R. Smith, Martin, Wilkins, Hallman, Whatley, Law, Felder, Rice, Sandifer, A. Young, Wofford, Simrill, Allison, Harrell, Keegan, Fair, Cotty, Cooper, Easterday, Quinn, Wells, Kelley, Shissias, Limehouse, Fulmer, Seithel, Huff, Fair, Cotty, Harrison, Walker, D. Smith, Robinson, Fleming, Hutson, Witherspoon, Riser, Davenport, Vaughn, Cato, Wright, Littlejohn, Klauber, Lanford, J. Harris, Sharpe and Haskins: A JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE XVII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, BY ADDING SECTION 16 SO AS TO PROHIBIT THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA OR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS FROM USING RACE, SEX, COLOR, ETHNICITY, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN AS A CRITERION FOR EITHER DISCRIMINATING AGAINST OR GRANTING PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT TO ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP IN THE OPERATION OF THE STATE'S SYSTEM OF PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, PUBLIC EDUCATION, OR PUBLIC CONTRACTING.

AMENDMENT NO. 2--RECONSIDERED

The motion of Rep. EASTERDAY to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 2 was adopted was taken up.

Rep. LIMBAUGH spoke in favor of the motion to reconsider.

Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved to table the motion to reconsider, and demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 32; Nays 66


Printed Page 2345 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson             Bailey               Baxley
Breeland             Brown, G.            Brown, J.
Brown, T.            Cave                 Clyburn
Cobb-Hunter          Govan                Harvin
Hines, J.            Hines, M.            Howard
Inabinett            Jennings             Keyserling
Lee                  Lloyd                McMahand
McTeer               Moody-Lawrence       Neal
Scott                Sheheen              Tucker
Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.          White
Wilkes               Williams

Total--32

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Askins               Boan
Brown, H.            Cain                 Cato
Chamblee             Cooper               Cotty
Cromer               Dantzler             Davenport
Delleney             Easterday            Gamble
Hallman              Harrell              Harris, J.
Harrison             Haskins              Hutson
Jaskwhich            Keegan               Kelley
Kirsh                Klauber              Koon
Lanford              Law                  Limbaugh
Limehouse            Littlejohn           Loftis
Marchbanks           Mason                McKay
Meacham              Quinn                Rhoad
Rice                 Riser                Sandifer
Seithel              Sharpe               Shissias
Simrill              Smith, D.            Smith, R.
Stille               Stoddard             Stuart
Townsend             Tripp                Trotter
Vaughn               Waldrop              Walker
Whatley              Wilder               Wilkins
Witherspoon          Wofford              Worley
Wright               Young                Young-Brickell

Total--66


Printed Page 2346 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

So, the House refused to table the motion to reconsider.

The question then recurred to the motion to reconsider, which was agreed to.

Rep. L. WHIPPER spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. LIMBAUGH moved to adjourn debate upon the Joint Resolution until Thursday, April 18, which was adopted.

H. 3021--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Joint Resolution was taken up.

H. 3021 -- Reps. Scott, Kelley and Lloyd: A JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 7, ARTICLE XVII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO LOTTERIES, SO AS TO AUTHORIZE LOTTERIES CONDUCTED ONLY BY THE STATE AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF THE REVENUES DERIVED FROM THE LOTTERIES.

Rep. CROMER proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name P:\amend\DKA\3631SD.96), which was adopted.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 7, Article XVII of the Constitution of this State be amended to read:

"Section 7. Except when conducted by the State, no lottery shall ever be is allowed or may be advertised by newspapers, or otherwise, or its tickets be sold in this State. Only the State may conduct lotteries as provided for by the General Assembly. The revenues from the state lottery must be paid into a state lottery fund to be invested by the State Treasurer with interest earned remaining a part of the fund. No more than fifteen percent of the revenues each year may be used for operational expenses of the state lottery, and fifty percent of the revenues must be expended in prizes. The remaining revenues each year must be used to provide scholarships to in-state residents to attend post-secondary institutions in this State in the manner the General Assembly shall provide by law but to include at a minimum the requirement that the student achieve at least a `B' average in high school and achieve a score set by law on a college scholastic aptitude test or achievement test.


Printed Page 2347 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

The game of bingo, when conducted by charitable, religious, or fraternal organizations exempt from federal income taxation or when conducted at recognized annual state and county fairs, shall is not be deemed considered a lottery prohibited by this section."

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballot:

"Must Section 7, Article XVII of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to authorize lotteries to be conducted only by the State as provided for by the General Assembly with the revenues each year used to provide scholarships to in-state residents to attend post-secondary institutions in this State in the manner the General Assembly shall provide by law but to include at a minimum the requirement that the student achieve at least a `B' average in high school and achieve a score set by law on a college scholastic aptitude test or achievement test?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."/

Amend title to conform.

Rep. CROMER explained the amendment.

Rep. COOPER moved to table the amendment, which was not agreed to by a division vote of 38 to 38.

The amendment was then adopted by a division vote of 51 to 47.

Rep. McMAHAND spoke against the Joint Resolution.

On motion of Rep. ANDERSON, with unanimous consent, Rep. McMAHAND's remarks were ordered printed in the Journal as follows:

"Should State Government Entice Its Citizens to Engage in Gambling"

I have discovered that gambling has far-reaching consequences that are detrimental to our society. It costs us much more than we gain. Gamblers use money that would be spent on other things in the local economy, often taking food and clothing from families. The loss of money to gambling is often made up through street crime and white collar


Printed Page 2348 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

crime. Gambling is a waste of time, talent, money, energy, and entire lives.

Gambling is an addictive activity that causes disharmony in families, poor job performance, and tremendous costs in rehabilitation. Money generated by the lottery often replaces legislative appropriations instead of supplementing them, and this creates a dependence on an unreliable source of funds. The lottery simply amounts to a regressive tax because poor people gamble a disproportionate share of income, and this situation impacts an already over-burdened welfare system. Jobs that are created by the gambling industry are mostly for minimal skills and pay.

The cost to our integrity is great. Gambling sends the message that we can get something for nothing; this message is counterproductive for a culture that believes in work and responsibility. The idea that one can be rescued from undesirable circumstances by winning money instead of taking responsibility for positive change goes hand-in-hand with addictive behavior. The gambler is buying hope for a charmed life. Society hopes to finance the public good without having to think about taxes. With gambling we risk fraud, scandals, organized crime and market saturation which dries up profits. Many people would argue that lotteries and gambling provide harmless entertainment. They would also say that the activities provide funds for revenue-starved governments through a "voluntary tax"--no play, no pay. Yet many around the Evangelical Church in America suggest gambling is bad for society.

A gambler's success is based on the expectation of other's failures. For one to win, millions of others must lose. The appeal is greed and coveting others' possessions. We distinguish gambling from the risk of starting a business or making an investment. In those situations, no one has to lose for a person to win. In fact, if one succeeds, others succeed also.

State government plays a large role in sanitizing gambling. Millions of dollars are spent to entice citizens to engage in an activity that is not in their interest. The State's proper role is regulation, but when it has a stake in the gambling industry, the regulatory role is compromised. States use advertising to deceive their own citizens. Slick, aggressive ad campaigns are used to prey on the weakest members of society.

Lotteries are an unfair way for governments to raise revenue. They are a form of "regressive tax." The poor and working class spend a much higher percentage of their income on the games than upper and middle classes. People attempt to buy a dream. There is a loss of hope in American society.

Undeniably, gambling creates thousands of new jobs and millions of dollars of easy revenue for state and local governments. However, most


Printed Page 2349 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

of these are low-paying service and transportation jobs that provide few transferable skills.

Gambling also has a tendency to "cannibalize" other businesses. The $100 spent gambling will not be spent in local restaurants, movie theaters, or clothing stores.

Lotteries rode a wave of popularity twice before in US history--during the Revolutionary War and in the decades before the Civil War. Fraud, scandals, and saturation of the market ended both waves. There were so many lotteries in some areas that none could make a profit.

The gambling issue is complicated, but we must answer the simple question: Who are the real winners and losers?

Individuals and government may receive short-term benefits from casinos and state-sponsored gambling, but the odds are against long-term benefits.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution the yeas and nays were taken on the passage of the Joint Resolution, resulting as follows:

Yeas 66; Nays 41

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison              Askins               Bailey
Baxley               Breeland             Cave
Clyburn              Cobb-Hunter          Cotty
Cromer               Dantzler             Felder
Fulmer               Gamble               Govan
Hallman              Harrell              Harrison
Hines, J.            Howard               Hutson
Inabinett            Jennings             Keegan
Kelley               Keyserling           Kinon
Knotts               Lanford              Law
Lee                  Limehouse            Littlejohn
Lloyd                Martin               Mason
McAbee               McCraw               Phillips
Quinn                Rhoad                Richardson
Riser                Rogers               Scott
Seithel              Sheheen              Shissias
Smith, D.            Smith, R.            Stoddard
Stuart               Thomas               Tucker
Vaughn               Walker               Whatley
Whipper, S.          White                Wilder

Printed Page 2350 . . . . . Wednesday, April 17, 1996

Wilkes               Williams             Wofford
Worley               Wright               Young-Brickell

Total--66

Those who voted in the negative are:

Anderson             Boan                 Brown, G.
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell
Cato                 Cooper               Davenport
Delleney             Easterday            Harvin
Haskins              Hines, M.            Hodges
Kirsh                Klauber              Koon
Limbaugh             Loftis               Marchbanks
McKay                McMahand             McTeer
Meacham              Moody-Lawrence       Neal
Neilson              Rice                 Robinson
Sandifer             Simrill              Stille
Townsend             Tripp                Trotter
Waldrop              Whipper, L.          Wilkins
Witherspoon          Young                

Total--41

So, having failed to receive the necessary vote, the Joint Resolution was ordered to third reading.


| Printed Page 2330, Apr. 17 | Printed Page 2350, Apr. 17 |

Page Finder Index