Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 9, 1996

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 4560, May 29 | Printed Page 4580, May 29 |

Printed Page 4570 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

(15) soil assimilative capacity;

(16) type of vegetative cover and its nutrient uptake ability;

(17) method of land application.

(B) The department shall require calibration of spray irrigation equipment.

(C) Waste must not be applied to or discharged onto land surface when the vertical separation between the waste and the water table is less than 1 1/2 feet.

(D) The department shall ensure that owners or operators adhere to land application rates.

Section 47-20-50. The following application rates shall only apply to animal feeding operations with a capacity of more than 160,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time.

(A) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and real property owned by another person on which a residence is located is 200 feet from property lines that are within 1,000 feet of the residence. The 200-foot setback is waived with the consent of the owner of the residence; however, the owner may not agree to less than 100 feet from the residence.

(B) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and waters of the State, ditches, and swales that drain directly into waters of the State is 100 feet.

(C) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and a public and private drinking water well is 200 feet.

Section 47-20-60. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations governing maximum lagoon size and minimum lagoon size, based on the permitted number of animal units to be maintained at the animal feeding operation. However, no single lagoon may exceed four acres.

(B) Lagoons and waste storage ponds for animal feeding operations with a capacity for more than 160,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time must be lined with a combination of natural and synthetic material which results in a permeability rating equal to or more protective than that required for human waste lagoons.

(C) The owner or operator of an animal feeding operation shall obtain certification from a licensed engineer or an appropriate Natural Resource Conservation Service employee that the operation's lagoon and waste storage pond were designed, constructed, and installed in accordance with regulatory specifications.

(D) Before the construction of a lagoon and a waste storage pond, the owner or operator shall remove all under-drains that exist from previous agricultural operations.


Printed Page 4571 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

(E) Waste must not be placed directly in or allowed to come into contact with groundwater. Additionally, the minimum separation distance between the lowest point of the lagoon and a waste storage pond and the highest point of the water table beneath the lagoon is 2 feet, unless adequate provisions have been taken and meet the standards established in regulations promulgated by the department.

(F) The department shall conduct a study of alternative technologies for the treatment of animal waste from animal feeding operations and promulgate regulations governing the use of these alternative treatment technologies. Every five years the department shall review changing technologies relating to the treatment of animal waste and promulgate appropriate regulations as needed. The department shall determine which animal feeding operations are required to use aerobic lagoons or other treatment technology.

(G) The department shall consider the cumulative impacts including, but not limited to, impacts from evaporation, storm water, and other potential and actual point and nonpoint sources of pollution runoff, levels of nutrients or other elements in the soils and nearby waterways, ground water or aquifer contamination, pathogens or other elements, and the pollution assimilative capacity of the receiving water body before permitting new or expanded animal feeding operations. The department may require alternative waste treatment in watersheds which are nutrient-sensitive.

(H) Disposal of animal carcasses or body parts into waste lagoons is prohibited.

Section 47-20-70. (A) No person may cause, allow, or permit emission into the ambient air of any substance or combination of substances in quantities that an undesirable level of odor is determined to result unless preventive measures of the type set out below are taken to abate or control the emission to the satisfaction of the department. When an odor problem comes to the attention of the department through field surveillance or specific complaints, the department shall determine if the odor is at an undesirable level by considering the character and degree of injury or interference to:

(1) the health or welfare of the people;

(2) plant, animal, or marine life;

(3) property;

(4) enjoyment of life or use of affected property.


Printed Page 4572 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

(B) The department may require these abatement or control practices:

(1) removal or disposal of odorous materials;

(2) methods in handling and storage of odorous materials that minimize emissions;

(3) prescribed standards in the maintenance of premises to reduce odorous emissions;

(4) best available control technology to reduce odorous emissions.

(C) After determining an undesirable level of odor exists, the department shall require remediation of the undesirable level of odor.

(D) Nothing in this section prohibits an individual or group of persons from bringing a complaint against an animal feeding operation.

Section 47-20-80. (A) The department, in consultation with the State Veterinarian, shall promulgate regulations relating to the control of vectors.

(B) All animal feeding operations shall utilize Best Management Practices as appropriate for the control of vectors and department regulations in order to maximize vector control.

Section 47-20-90. (A) The department shall act on all permits to prevent, so far as reasonably possible considering relevant standards under state and federal laws, an increase in pollution of the waters and air of the State from any new or enlarged sources.

(B) The department also shall act on all permits so as to prevent degradation of water quality due to the cumulative and secondary effects of permit decisions. Cumulative and secondary effects are impacts attributable to the collective effects of a number of animal feeding operations in a defined area and include the effects of additional projects similar to the requested permit in areas available for development in the vicinity. All permit decisions shall ensure that the waste treatment and utilization alternative with the least adverse impact on the environment be utilized. Cumulative and secondary effects shall include, but are not limited to, runoff from land application of animal waste and an animal feeding operation, evaporation and atmospheric deposition of elements, ground water or aquifer contamination, buildup of elements in the soil, and other potential and actual point and nonpoint sources of pollution in the vicinity.

Section 47-20-100. The department shall establish the amount of an application and annual operation fee in accordance with the Environmental Protection Fund Act, Section 48-2-10 of the 1976 Code, to cover, at a minimum, an annual inspection of all animal feeding operations in the State with a capacity for more than 160,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time. The annual inspection must include,


Printed Page 4573 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

but is not limited to, an on-site visit, review of the implementation of a waste management plan, review of results of monitoring analysis, annual pollutant loading rates, cumulative pollutant loading rates, and review of all records required by this chapter.

Section 47-20-110. (A) All animal feeding operations established after the effective date of this chapter which require the use of a lagoon and a waste storage pond and which have a capacity for more than 160,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time are required to install at least one up-gradient and two down-gradient monitoring wells at a depth which the department considers appropriate around the lagoon in order to monitor seepage of waste from the lagoon.

(B) Each monitoring well installed must be analyzed at least once annually. However, the department may conduct routine and random visits to the animal feeding operation to sample the monitoring wells.

(C) Records must be kept by the owner or operator of the animal feeding operation according to regulations promulgated by the department.

(D) If leakage is discovered beyond an acceptable level as determined by the department, the lagoon must be repaired at the owner or operator's expense.

Section 47-20-120. (A) No waste may be released from the premises of an animal feeding operation to waters of the State unless the waste is treated to drinking water quality standards.

(B) Water that is completely surrounded by land owned by the applicant and has no connection to other water is excluded from the setback requirements outlined in this chapter.

Section 47-20-130. (A) Clemson University, in conjunction with the South Carolina Department of Agriculture and the department, shall create a training and certification program for owners or operators of animal feeding operations which shall include, but is not limited to, understanding relevant regulations, issues, standards, principles, and practices regarding siting and management of an animal feeding operation and land application of animal waste; testing for toxic metals, organic materials, and other elements; use of antibiotics; implementing emergency procedures; and spill prevention protocols including testing and inspection of dikes.

(B) An operator of an animal feeding operation and waste utilization area must be certified on the operation of animal waste management under the program created in subsection (A).

Section 47-20-140. (A) For an animal feeding operation which has the capacity of more than 160,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time and is seeking to construct or expand an established animal feeding operation, the department shall publish a notice


Printed Page 4574 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

of intent to construct or to expand an established animal feeding operation governed by this chapter in a local newspaper of general circulation, notify persons residing on adjoining property, and notify the relevant county commission and water supply district at the expense of the animal feeding operation applicant. Proof of notification of neighboring land owners and residents must be supplied by the applicant. This notice shall contain instructions for public review and comment to the department on the proposed construction and operation of the facility. The notice shall allow for a minimum thirty-day comment period.

(B) The department shall conduct a public hearing and shall provide notice of the public hearing in accordance with the notice requirements provided for in subsection (A) in any case in which the department receives at least twenty letters requesting a public hearing.

Section 47-20-150. (A) Permits for animal feeding operations covered under this chapter must be renewed every seven years. However, subsequent to the issuance of a permit, if the animal feeding operation is not in operation or production for two consecutive years, the permit is not valid and a new permit must be obtained.

(B) The department shall determine the appropriate fee for permit renewals.

Section 47-20-160. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations for this act by January 1, 1998, and submit a report on its progress by January 1, 1997, in consultation with representatives from: the South Carolina Poultry Federation, South Carolina Pork Producer's Association, South Carolina Dairyman's Association, South Carolina Cattlemen's Association, South Carolina Farm Bureau Federation, South Carolina Wildlife Federation, South Carolina Chapter of the Sierra Club, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, League of Women Voters, Clemson University, South Carolina State University, Natural Resource Conservation Service, South Carolina Department of Agriculture, South Carolina Shrimpers' Association, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Land Resources Division, and the South Carolina Association of Conservation Districts. Each organization may appoint one member to consult with the department regarding this chapter, regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter, and the chapter's implementation. The department shall consult with representatives in meetings which must be conducted by the department, upon the call of the director of the department or the director's designee or upon request to the department of any three members. Representatives from these organizations may not receive mileage, per diem, or subsistence.


Printed Page 4575 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

(B) The department shall promulgate regulations for siting and managing animal feeding operations with a capacity of 160,000 pounds of normal production of animal live weight or less at any one time, including land application of waste. The regulations must be at a minimum as protective as the department's current guidelines.

(C) The department shall promulgate regulations for siting and managing animal feeding operations, including land application of animal waste, for the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine, and avian species. The regulations must be at a minimum as protective as the department's current guidelines.

Section 47-20-170. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter is punishable as under the Pollution Control Act."

SECTION 2. Section 46-45-30 of the 1976 Code, as amended by Act 442 of 1990, is further amended to read:

"Section 46-45-30. (A) No established agricultural facility or any agricultural operation at an established agricultural facility is or may become a nuisance, private or public, by any changed conditions in or about the locality of the facility or operation if the facility or operation has been in operation for one year or more. The provisions of This section do does not apply whenever a nuisance results from the negligent, improper, or illegal operation of an agricultural facility or operation."

SECTION 3. This act takes effect July 1, 1996./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. MEACHAM spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. NEAL spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. FELDER moved immediate cloture on the entire matter.

Rep. MEACHAM demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 49; Nays 49

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Bailey               Beck                 Boan
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell
Cato                 Chamblee             Dantzler
Delleney             Felder               Fleming
Fulmer               Gamble               Harvin
Kinon                Kirsh                Klauber

Printed Page 4576 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Knotts               Koon                 Law
Limbaugh             Littlejohn           Loftis
McAbee               McCraw               Quinn
Rhoad                Rice                 Riser
Sandifer             Sharpe               Smith, R.
Spearman             Stoddard             Stuart
Townsend             Tripp                Trotter
Vaughn               Waldrop              Walker
Wilder               Wilkes               Wilkins
Witherspoon          Wofford              Wright
Young

Total--49

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Baxley               Breeland
Brown, G.            Brown, J.            Brown, T.
Byrd                 Canty                Clyburn
Cobb-Hunter          Cooper               Cotty
Davenport            Govan                Hallman
Harrell              Harris, J.           Hodges
Howard               Hutson               Inabinett
Jennings             Keegan               Kelley
Keyserling           Lanford              Lee
Limehouse            Lloyd                Martin
Mason                McElveen             McMahand
McTeer               Meacham              Moody-Lawrence
Neal                 Richardson           Robinson
Rogers               Scott                Seithel
Sheheen              Shissias             Simrill
Stille               Wells                Whipper, L.
Young-Brickell

Total--49

So, immediate cloture was rejected.

Rep. SPEARMAN moved to table the amendment.


Printed Page 4577 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 54; Nays 50

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Bailey               Boan                 Brown, G.
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell
Cave                 Chamblee             Cooper
Cromer               Dantzler             Delleney
Felder               Fleming              Fulmer
Gamble               Harvin               Inabinett
Kirsh                Klauber              Knotts
Koon                 Lee                  Limbaugh
Littlejohn           Lloyd                Loftis
Martin               McAbee               McCraw
McTeer               Phillips             Quinn
Rhoad                Rice                 Riser
Robinson             Sandifer             Sharpe
Smith, D.            Spearman             Stoddard
Stuart               Townsend             Tripp
Trotter              Vaughn               Waldrop
Walker               Wilder               Wilkes
Wilkins              Witherspoon          Wright

Total--54

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Anderson             Baxley
Beck                 Breeland             Brown, J.
Byrd                 Canty                Cato
Clyburn              Cobb-Hunter          Cotty
Davenport            Govan                Hallman
Harrell              Harris, J.           Hodges
Howard               Hutson               Jennings
Keegan               Kelley               Keyserling
Kinon                Lanford              Law
Limehouse            Mason                McElveen
McMahand             Meacham              Moody-Lawrence
Neal                 Neilson              Richardson
Rogers               Scott                Seithel
Sheheen              Shissias             Simrill

Printed Page 4578 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Smith, R.            Stille               Tucker
Wells                Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.
Wofford              Young-Brickell       

Total--50

So, the amendment was tabled.

AMENDMENT NO. 3A--MOTION TO RECONSIDER TABLED

The motion of Rep. MARTIN to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 3A was tabled was taken up.

Rep. SHARPE moved to table the motion to reconsider.

Rep. SEITHEL demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 55; Nays 49

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Bailey               Boan                 Brown, G.
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell
Cave                 Chamblee             Cooper
Cromer               Dantzler             Delleney
Felder               Fleming              Fulmer
Gamble               Harvin               Inabinett
Kinon                Kirsh                Klauber
Knotts               Koon                 Law
Lee                  Limbaugh             Littlejohn
Loftis               McAbee               McCraw
McTeer               Neilson              Phillips
Quinn                Rhoad                Rice
Riser                Robinson             Sharpe
Smith, D.            Spearman             Stoddard
Stuart               Townsend             Tripp
Trotter              Vaughn               Waldrop
Walker               Wilder               Wilkes
Wilkins              Witherspoon          Wofford
Wright

Total--55
Printed Page 4579 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison              Anderson             Baxley
Beck                 Breeland             Brown, J.
Byrd                 Canty                Cato
Clyburn              Cobb-Hunter          Cotty
Davenport            Govan                Hallman
Harrell              Harris, J.           Hodges
Howard               Hutson               Jennings
Keegan               Kelley               Keyserling
Lanford              Limehouse            Lloyd
Martin               Mason                McElveen
McMahand             Meacham              Moody-Lawrence
Neal                 Richardson           Rogers
Sandifer             Scott                Seithel
Sheheen              Shissias             Simrill
Smith, R.            Stille               Tucker
Wells                Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.
Young-Brickell       

Total--49

So, the motion to reconsider was tabled.

Rep. HODGES spoke in favor of the Senate amendments.

Rep. McELVEEN spoke against the Senate amendments.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. SIMRILL a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.

Reps. MEACHAM, SEITHEL, HODGES and YOUNG-BRICKELL proposed the following Amendment No. 10A (Doc Name P:\amend\PFM\9403AC.96), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION 1. Title 47 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"CHAPTER 20

Confined Swine Feeding Operations

Section 47-20-10. As used in this chapter:


| Printed Page 4560, May 29 | Printed Page 4580, May 29 |

Page Finder Index