Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 9, 1996

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 4741, May 30 | Printed Page 4760, May 30 |

Printed Page 4750 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

which is constructed or expanded, if the titleholder of adjoining land to the animal feeding operation executes a written waiver with the title holder of the land where the animal feeding operation is established or proposed to be located, under terms and conditions that the parties negotiate. The written waiver becomes effective only upon the recording of the waiver in the office of the Register of Mesne Conveyances of the county in which the benefitted land is located. The filed waiver precludes enforcement by the State of Section 47-20-20 (B)(1) - (4) as it relates to the animal feeding operation and to real property owned by another person.

Section 47-20-40. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations relating to land application rates for animal waste for animal feeding operations of a capacity for more than 420,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time. These rates must be based on the waste's impact on the environment, animals, and people living in the environment. In developing annual pollutant loading rates and cumulative pollutant loading rates, the department shall consider:

(1) soil type;

(2) type of vegetation growing in land-applied area;

(3) proximity to 100-year flood plain;

(4) location in watershed;

(5) nutrient sensitivity of receiving land and waters;

(6) soil and sediment tests of receiving land and waters;

(7) nutrient, heavy metal, and pollutant content of the waste being applied;

(8) proximity to a State Designated Focus Area; Outstanding Resource Water; Heritage Corridor; Historic Preservation District; state or national park or forest; state or federal research area; and privately owned wildlife refuge, park, or trust property;

(9) proximity to other point and nonpoint sources;

(10) slope of land;

(11) distance to water table or ground water aquifer;

(12) timing of waste application to coincide with vegetative cover growth cycle;

(13) timing of harvest of vegetative cover;

(14) hydraulic loading limitations; and

(15) soil assimilative capacity;

(16) type of vegetative cover and its nutrient uptake ability;

(17) method of land application.

(B) The department shall require calibration of spray irrigation equipment.


Printed Page 4751 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

(C) Waste must not be applied to or discharged onto land surface when the vertical separation between the waste and the water table is less than 1 1/2 feet.

(D) The department shall ensure that owners or operators adhere to land application rates.

Section 47-20-50. The following application rates shall only apply to animal feeding operations with a capacity of more than 420,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time.

(A) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and real property owned by another person on which a residence is located is 200 feet from property lines that are within 1,000 feet of the residence. The 200-foot setback is waived with the consent of the owner of the residence; however, the owner may not agree to less than 100 feet from the residence.

(B) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and waters of the State, ditches, and swales that drain directly into waters of the State is 100 feet.

(C) The minimum separation distance in feet required between a waste utilization area and a public and private drinking water well is 200 feet.

Section 47-20-60. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations governing maximum lagoon size and minimum lagoon size, based on the permitted number of animal units to be maintained at the animal feeding operation. However, no single lagoon may exceed four acres.

(B) Lagoons and waste storage ponds for animal feeding operations with a capacity for more than 420,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time must be lined with a combination of natural and synthetic material which results in a permeability rating equal to or more protective than that required for human waste lagoons.

(C) The owner or operator of an animal feeding operation shall obtain certification from a licensed engineer or an appropriate Natural Resource Conservation Service employee that the operation's lagoon and waste storage pond were designed, constructed, and installed in accordance with regulatory specifications.

(D) Before the construction of a lagoon and a waste storage pond, the owner or operator shall remove all under-drains that exist from previous agricultural operations.

(E) Waste must not be placed directly in or allowed to come into contact with groundwater. Additionally, the minimum separation distance between the lowest point of the lagoon and a waste storage pond and the highest point of the water table beneath the lagoon is 2 feet, unless


Printed Page 4752 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

adequate provisions have been taken and meet the standards established in regulations promulgated by the department.

(F) The department shall conduct a study of alternative technologies for the treatment of animal waste from animal feeding operations and promulgate regulations governing the use of these alternative treatment technologies. Every five years the department shall review changing technologies relating to the treatment of animal waste and promulgate appropriate regulations as needed. The department shall determine which animal feeding operations are required to use aerobic lagoons or other treatment technology.

(G) The department shall consider the cumulative impacts including, but not limited to, impacts from evaporation, storm water, and other potential and actual point and nonpoint sources of pollution runoff, levels of nutrients or other elements in the soils and nearby waterways, ground water or aquifer contamination, pathogens or other elements, and the pollution assimilative capacity of the receiving water body before permitting new or expanded animal feeding operations. The department may require alternative waste treatment in watersheds which are nutrient-sensitive.

(H) Disposal of animal carcasses or body parts into waste lagoons is prohibited.

Section 47-20-70. (A) No person may cause, allow, or permit emission into the ambient air of any substance or combination of substances in quantities that an undesirable level of odor is determined to result unless preventive measures of the type set out below are taken to abate or control the emission to the satisfaction of the department. When an odor problem comes to the attention of the department through field surveillance or specific complaints, the department shall determine if the odor is at an undesirable level by considering the character and degree of injury or interference to:

(1) the health or welfare of the people;

(2) plant, animal, or marine life;

(3) property;

(4) enjoyment of life or use of affected property.
(B) The department may require these abatement or control practices:

(1) removal or disposal of odorous materials;

(2) methods in handling and storage of odorous materials that minimize emissions;

(3) prescribed standards in the maintenance of premises to reduce odorous emissions;

(4) best available control technology to reduce odorous emissions.


Printed Page 4753 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

(C) After determining an undesirable level of odor exists, the department shall require remediation of the undesirable level of odor.

(D) Nothing in this section prohibits an individual or group of persons from bringing a complaint against an animal feeding operation.

Section 47-20-80. (A) The department, in consultation with the State Veterinarian, shall promulgate regulations relating to the control of vectors.

(B) All animal feeding operations shall utilize Best Management Practices as appropriate for the control of vectors and department regulations in order to maximize vector control.

Section 47-20-90. (A) The department shall act on all permits to prevent, so far as reasonably possible considering relevant standards under state and federal laws, an increase in pollution of the waters and air of the State from any new or enlarged sources.

(B) The department also shall act on all permits so as to prevent degradation of water quality due to the cumulative and secondary effects of permit decisions. Cumulative and secondary effects are impacts attributable to the collective effects of a number of animal feeding operations in a defined area and include the effects of additional projects similar to the requested permit in areas available for development in the vicinity. All permit decisions shall ensure that the waste treatment and utilization alternative with the least adverse impact on the environment be utilized. Cumulative and secondary effects shall include, but are not limited to, runoff from land application of animal waste and an animal feeding operation, evaporation and atmospheric deposition of elements, ground water or aquifer contamination, buildup of elements in the soil, and other potential and actual point and nonpoint sources of pollution in the vicinity.

Section 47-20-100. The department shall establish the amount of an application and annual operation fee in accordance with the Environmental Protection Fund Act, Section 48-2-10 of the 1976 Code, to cover, at a minimum, an annual inspection of all animal feeding operations in the State with a capacity for more than 420,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time. The annual inspection must include, but is not limited to, an on-site visit, review of the implementation of a waste management plan, review of results of monitoring analysis, annual pollutant loading rates, cumulative pollutant loading rates, and review of all records required by this chapter.

Section 47-20-110. (A) All animal feeding operations established after the effective date of this chapter which require the use of a lagoon and a waste storage pond and which have a capacity for more than 420,000


Printed Page 4754 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time are required to install at least one up-gradient and two down-gradient monitoring wells at a depth which the department considers appropriate around the lagoon in order to monitor seepage of waste from the lagoon.

(B) Each monitoring well installed must be analyzed at least once annually. However, the department may conduct routine and random visits to the animal feeding operation to sample the monitoring wells.

(C) Records must be kept by the owner or operator of the animal feeding operation according to regulations promulgated by the department.

(D) If leakage is discovered beyond an acceptable level as determined by the department, the lagoon must be repaired at the owner or operator's expense.

Section 47-20-120. (A) No waste may be released from the premises of an animal feeding operation to waters of the State unless the waste is treated to drinking water quality standards.

(B) Water that is completely surrounded by land owned by the applicant and has no connection to other water is excluded from the setback requirements outlined in this chapter.

Section 47-20-130. (A) Clemson University, in conjunction with the South Carolina Department of Agriculture and the department, shall create a training and certification program for owners or operators of animal feeding operations which shall include, but is not limited to, understanding relevant regulations, issues, standards, principles, and practices regarding siting and management of an animal feeding operation and land application of animal waste; testing for toxic metals, organic materials, and other elements; use of antibiotics; implementing emergency procedures; and spill prevention protocols including testing and inspection of dikes.

(B) An operator of an animal feeding operation and waste utilization area must be certified on the operation of animal waste management under the program created in subsection (A).

Section 47-20-140. (A) For an animal feeding operation which has the capacity of more than 420,000 pounds of normal production animal live weight at any one time and is seeking to construct or expand an established animal feeding operation, the department shall publish a notice of intent to construct or to expand an established animal feeding operation governed by this chapter in a local newspaper of general circulation, notify persons residing on adjoining property, and notify the relevant county commission and water supply district at the expense of the animal feeding operation applicant. Proof of notification of neighboring land owners and residents must be supplied by the applicant. This notice shall contain instructions for public review and comment to the department on


Printed Page 4755 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

the proposed construction and operation of the facility. The notice shall allow for a minimum thirty-day comment period.

(B) The department shall conduct a public hearing and shall provide notice of the public hearing in accordance with the notice requirements provided for in subsection (A) in any case in which the department receives at least twenty letters requesting a public hearing.

Section 47-20-150. (A) Permits for animal feeding operations covered under this chapter must be renewed every seven years. However, subsequent to the issuance of a permit, if the animal feeding operation is not in operation or production for two consecutive years, the permit is not valid and a new permit must be obtained.

(B) The department shall determine the appropriate fee for permit renewals.

Section 47-20-160. (A) The department shall promulgate regulations for this act by January 1, 1998, and submit a report on its progress by January 1, 1997.

(B) The department shall promulgate regulations for siting and managing animal feeding operations with a capacity of 420,000 pounds of normal production of animal live weight or less at any one time, including land application of waste. The regulations must be at a minimum as protective as the department's current guidelines.

Section 47-20-170. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter is punishable as under the Pollution Control Act."

SECTION 2. Section 46-45-30 of the 1976 Code, as amended by Act 442 of 1990, is further amended to read:

"Section 46-45-30. (A) No established agricultural facility or any agricultural operation at an established agricultural facility is or may become a nuisance, private or public, by any changed conditions in or about the locality of the facility or operation if the facility or operation has been in operation for one year or more. The provisions of This section do does not apply whenever a nuisance results from the negligent, improper, or illegal operation of an agricultural facility or operation."

SECTION 3. This act takes effect July 1, 1996./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. MEACHAM explained the amendment.

Rep. NEAL spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. SPEARMAN spoke against the amendment.

Rep. FELDER moved to table the motion.


Printed Page 4756 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

Rep. MEACHAM demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 50; Nays 54

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Bailey               Boan                 Brown, G.
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell
Cato                 Cave                 Chamblee
Dantzler             Delleney             Easterday
Felder               Fleming              Gamble
Harris, P.           Harvin               Inabinett
Kinon                Kirsh                Klauber
Knotts               Koon                 Lee
Limbaugh             Littlejohn           Loftis
McAbee               McCraw               McTeer
Phillips             Quinn                Rhoad
Rice                 Riser                Robinson
Sharpe               Smith, D.            Spearman
Stoddard             Stuart               Tripp
Vaughn               Waldrop              Walker
Wilder               Wilkes               Wilkins
Witherspoon          Wright               

Total--50

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Baxley               Beck
Breeland             Brown, J.            Brown, T.
Canty                Clyburn              Cobb-Hunter
Cooper               Cotty                Cromer
Davenport            Govan                Harrell
Harris, J.           Hines, J.            Hines, M.
Hodges               Howard               Hutson
Jaskwhich            Jennings             Keegan
Kelley               Keyserling           Lanford
Law                  Limehouse            Lloyd
Mason                McElveen             McMahand
Meacham              Neal                 Neilson
Richardson           Rogers               Sandifer
Seithel              Sheheen              Shissias
Simrill              Smith, R.            Stille

Printed Page 4757 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

Townsend             Trotter              Tucker
Wells                Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.
Wofford              Young                Young-Brickell

Total--54

So, the House refused to table the amendment.

Rep. QUINN spoke against the amendment.

The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.

Rep. MEACHAM demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 56; Nays 51

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison              Baxley               Beck
Breeland             Brown, J.            Brown, T.
Byrd                 Canty                Clyburn
Cobb-Hunter          Cooper               Cotty
Cromer               Davenport            Govan
Hallman              Harrell              Harris, J.
Harris, P.           Hines, J.            Hines, M.
Hodges               Howard               Hutson
Jaskwhich            Jennings             Keegan
Kelley               Keyserling           Lanford
Law                  Limehouse            Lloyd
Mason                McElveen             McMahand
Meacham              Neal                 Neilson
Richardson           Rogers               Sandifer
Seithel              Sheheen              Shissias
Simrill              Smith, R.            Stille
Trotter              Tucker               Wells
Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.          Wofford
Young                Young-Brickell

Total--56

Those who voted in the negative are:

Bailey               Boan                 Brown, G.
Brown, H.            Cain                 Carnell

Printed Page 4758 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

Cato                 Cave                 Chamblee
Dantzler             Delleney             Easterday
Felder               Fleming              Gamble
Harvin               Inabinett            Kinon
Kirsh                Klauber              Knotts
Koon                 Lee                  Limbaugh
Littlejohn           Loftis               Martin
McAbee               McCraw               Phillips
Quinn                Rhoad                Rice
Riser                Robinson             Sharpe
Smith, D.            Spearman             Stoddard
Stuart               Townsend             Tripp
Vaughn               Waldrop              Walker
Whatley              Wilder               Wilkes
Wilkins              Witherspoon          Wright

Total--51

So, the amendment was adopted.

Rep. RICE proposed the following Amendment No. 14A (Doc Name P:\amend\PT\2608JM.96), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION . Notwithstanding any other provision of this act or of law, the closed United States Naval Base in Charleston County and the plant at the Savannah River Site are exempt from any regulations which restrict economic development of the hog industry./

Renumber SECTIONS to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. RICE explained the amendment.

Rep. SEITHEL moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 60 to 28.

The Senate amendments, as amended, were then agreed to and the Bill ordered returned to the Senate.


Printed Page 4759 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 1996

H. 4012--SENATE AMENDMENTS

AMENDED AND RETURNED TO THE SENATE

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration.

H. 4012 -- Reps. Townsend, Trotter and Stille: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING ARTICLE 71 TO CHAPTER 3, TITLE 56, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SPECIAL LICENSE PLATE FOR FOREST PRODUCT HAULERS; TO AMEND SECTION 56-3-120, RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS FROM REGISTERING AND LICENSING VEHICLES, SO AS TO EXEMPT CERTAIN KNUCKLEBOOM LOADERS FROM REGISTRATION AND LICENSING; TO AMEND SECTION 56-5-4090, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE LENGTH OF LOAD ON CERTAIN POLE TRAILERS AND CARRIERS, SO AS TO DELETE RESTRICTIONS TO THE HOURS CERTAIN VEHICLES CAN TRAVEL ON THE STATE'S HIGHWAYS; TO AMEND SECTION 56-5-4630, RELATING TO THE ATTACHMENT OF A LAMP OR FLAG ON LOADS EXTENDING CERTAIN LENGTHS BEYOND THE BED OR BODY OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, SO AS TO REVISE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE FLAG THAT MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE LOAD; AND TO AMEND SECTION 58-23-50, RELATING TO CERTAIN FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION THAT ARE EXEMPTED FROM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATIONS, SO AS TO EXEMPT THE TRANSPORTATION OF LOGS FROM COMMISSION REGULATION.

Rep. KLAUBER proposed the following Amendment No. 1A (Doc Name P:\amend\DKA\3847DW.96), which was adopted.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION 1. Section 56-3-1820 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 164 of 1993, is further amended to read:

"Section 56-3-1820. The special license plates must be of the same size and general design of regular motor vehicle license plates upon which must be imprinted `National Guard' and the figure of the `Minute Man' with numbers the department may determine. Special license plates for retired members of the National Guard must denote the member's retired status in the location and manner determined by the department. The biennial fee for the special license plates is thirty dollars in addition to the regular motor vehicle registration fee prescribed by Article 5 of this


| Printed Page 4741, May 30 | Printed Page 4760, May 30 |

Page Finder Index