Journal of the Senate
of the First Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 2480, May 5 | Printed Page 2500, May 5 |

Printed Page 2490 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

Senator J. VERNE SMITH explained the amendment.

Senator J. VERNE SMITH moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.

Amendment No. 216

Senators JACKSON and SHORT proposed the following Amendment No. 216 (3362R240.DJ), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, on page 601, after line 31, by adding a new section to read:

/SECTION .

TO AMEND TITLE 44, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING CHAPTER 122 SO AS TO DIRECT THE SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL TO DEVELOP AND COORDINATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY PREVENTION PROGRAMS THROUGH FUNDING AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL PROJECTS AND SELECTION PROCEDURES.

A. Title 44 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"CHAPTER 122

Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention

Section 44-122-10. (A) The South Carolina Human Services Coordinating Council shall develop and coordinate the implementation of community-based programs and projects relating to the problem of adolescent pregnancy in order to most effectively reduce the numbers of adolescent pregnancies.

(B) Before funds are allocated for adolescent pregnancy prevention projects, the council shall review the recommendations of the Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Committee, as established in Section 44-122-20, and shall recommend funding priorities to the Department of Health and Human Services. The council also shall advise the General Assembly on issues relating to the problem of adolescent pregnancy in this State.

Section 44-122-20. There is established the Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Committee to be appointed by the Human Services


Printed Page 2491 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

Coordinating Council. Committee membership must be made up of council members and also must include representatives from:

(1) South Carolina Council on Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention;

(2) South Carolina Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics;

(3) United Way of South Carolina;

(4) March of Dimes;

(5) Alliance for South Carolina's Children;

(6) corporate community;

(7) religious community;

(8) two high school students;

(9) media;

(10) a school guidance counselor;

(11) the South Carolina Obstetrics and Gynecology Society.

Members shall serve terms of four years except student members shall serve terms of two years.

Section 44-122-30. (A) The South Carolina Human Services Coordinating Council shall establish and administer a program to distribute funds appropriated for adolescent pregnancy prevention projects and shall adopt rules necessary to implement the program. Projects must be undertaken as pilot projects to serve as successful models for replication in rural and urban areas of the State where there are statistically high incidences of adolescent pregnancy, premature births, and infant mortality.

(B) The council shall evaluate adolescent pregnancy projects funded as a result of this program at least yearly and shall report its findings to the General Assembly, the State Budget and Control Board, and the Governor's Office. The evaluation of these projects shall include a study of the effectiveness of the project in reducing the pregnancy rate within the target populations.

Section 44-122-40. The Department of Health and Human Services shall fund the Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program projects. Funds shall be appropriated to the Department of Health and Human Services by the General Assembly in the annual General Appropriations Act. The Human Services Coordinating Council annually shall conduct a proposal-writing session that must be attended by a representative of an agency or organization that wishes to apply for funding, and the session shall define the criteria for accountability and evaluation that the department requires of projects. The session also shall provide information about additional funding sources to which an agency or organization might turn to satisfy the matching requirement for funding, as provided for in Section 44-122-50(E).


Printed Page 2492 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

Section 44-122-50. (A) A local agency or organization or combination of agencies and organizations may apply to the department for an allocation of funds to operate adolescent pregnancy preventive projects. The application shall contain an analysis of adolescent pregnancy and related problems in the locality the project would serve and a description of how the project would attempt, over a period of at least five years, to prevent the problems. The application also shall contain a project budget.

(B) Projects applying for first-year funding shall:

(1) have a plan of action that extends for at least five years for prevention of adolescent pregnancy;

(2) have realistic, specific, and measurable goals and objectives for the prevention of adolescent pregnancy;

(3) before submitting its proposal, send a representative to the proposal-writing session held by the council;

(4) have an emphasis on abstinence when possible and must be based on strategies with proven success rates, and use materials that are factually and scientifically correct.

(C) Each project shall:

(a) have a board of advisors composed of members from outside the sponsoring agency of the project. The board of advisors shall include representatives from the medical community, the educational field, and one student who must be a junior in high school and who must serve two years. The board also shall include representatives of the media, government, charitable organizations, and private business. The board of advisors shall meet at least quarterly and advise project staff on project policies and operations;

(b) comply with reporting, contracting, and evaluation requirements of the department;

(c) define and maintain cooperative ties with other community institutions;

(d) demonstrate its ability to attract financial support from sources other than the State including sources in the local community;

(D) These criteria must be applied in selecting projects for first year funding:

(1) adequacy of proposed resources to meet project objectives;

(2) appropriateness of project strategies to reduce adolescent pregnancy with a primary focus of preventing the onset of early sexual activity;

(3) level of community support, including endorsement from the appropriate local governmental entity and documentation from the appropriate local governmental entity and from community organizations


Printed Page 2493 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

that citizens were given the opportunity to provide input into the proposed program and that there is community support for the proposal. Documentation may include letters or statements of support from citizens or community organizations or statements that community support was expressed at public hearings. A public hearing is not required by this item;

(4) degree of need of the locality, including that the county has a significant adolescent pregnancy problem;

(5) clear demonstration of how the project will coordinate, collaborate, and utilize the resources of other community entities that have an interest in positive youth development and adolescent risk behavior reduction.

(E) If a project that has been selected for first-year funding continues to meet the requirements of subsections (B) and (C), funding for that project shall continue, to the extent of available money, for an additional four years. The level of funding provided by the council to approved projects must be set according to this schedule:

(1) first year, eighty percent of the project's annual budget not to exceed the maximum award established by the department;

(2) second year, ninety percent of the state funds awarded in the first year;

(3) third year, seventy-five percent of the state funds awarded in the first year;

(4) fourth year, sixty-five percent of the state funds awarded in the first year;

(5) fifth year, fifty percent of the state funds awarded in the first year.

The portion of a project's budget that must come from sources other than the State may be provided as in-kind contributions as well as cash.

(F) No project shall receive state funding if it has received state funding for five full years previously. A project that has received state funding before July 1, 1995, is eligible for consideration for an additional five years' state support but the project must meet the same requirements as other applicants and must be treated as other applicants in the selection process.

(G) The council shall determine the maximum annual amount that may be awarded to any one project.

(H) As adolescent pregnancy prevention project grant funds decrease, a project shall maintain its original budget level, less the amount expended for start-up costs. The council shall develop guidelines for determining start-up costs, and these guidelines must be uniform for all


Printed Page 2494 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

projects. Local match percentage may come from any in-kind source or newly generated funds, public or private, available to the project.

(I) Project selection must be based solely on the merits of the proposals submitted to the council."/

Amend sections, totals and title to conform.

Senator JACKSON explained the amendment.

Senator JACKSON moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.

Amendment No. 233

Senator GIESE proposed the following Amendment No. 233 (PFM\7472AC.95), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION ___

TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-260, AS AMENDED, 0F THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO DISCIPLINARY ACTION THAT MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST A PHARMACIST, SO AS TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO IMPOSE A CIVIL FINE OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS.

Section 40-43-260 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Section 917, Act 181 of 1993, is further amended to read:

"Section 40-43-260. (A) The board may, after a hearing and upon proof that grounds exist, may order the revocation or suspension of a license, publicly or privately reprimand the holder of a license, or take any other reasonable action short of revocation or suspension, such as requiring the licensee to undertake additional professional training subject to the direction and supervision of the board. The board may also impose such restraint upon the practice of the licensee as circumstances warrant until the licensee demonstrates to the board adequate professional competence. In addition to any other sanction imposed by the board upon the licensee, the board may require the licensee to pay a civil penalty of up to one thousand dollars to the board for each violation of this chapter or of the regulations promulgated by the board, but the total penalty or fine for the violations may not exceed ten thousand dollars. All fines must be remitted to the State Treasurer and deposited in a special fund from which the board must be reimbursed for administrative costs for each case upon the approval of the Budget and Control Board. At any time when this fund exceeds twenty thousand dollars, all excess funds must be remitted to the General Fund. Fines are payable immediately upon the


Printed Page 2495 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

effective date of discipline. Interest accrues after fines are due at the maximum rate allowed by law. No licensee against whom a fine is levied is eligible for reinstatement until the fine has been paid in full.
Any action of the board relating to the revocation or suspension of a license, or other action either restricting a license or limiting or otherwise disciplining a licensee, shall must be taken only after a written complaint of misconduct has been filed with the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (Act 176 of 1977) [Sections 1-23-10 et seq.] and regulations promulgated by it the board. If a complaint is not dismissed, in accordance with subsection (B), a hearing shall must be held.

(B) Upon its review, the board may either dismiss the complaint or find that the licensee is guilty of misconduct meriting sanction. In either event, the board shall file a final certified report of the proceedings before it with the secretary of the board and the secretary shall forthwith notify the complainant and the licensee and their counsel of such the action.

(C) Any A decision by the board to revoke, suspend, fine, or otherwise restrict a license or limit or otherwise discipline a licensee shall must be by majority vote of the board members and shall be is subject to review by an administrative law judge as provided under Article 5 of Chapter 23 of Title 1 upon petition filed by the licensee with the administrative law judge and a copy served upon the secretary of the board within thirty days from the date of delivery of its decision to the licensee. Such The review shall be is limited to the record established by the board hearing.

(D) Any A decision by the board to revoke, suspend, fine, or otherwise restrict a license or limit or otherwise discipline a licensee shall become becomes effective upon delivery of a copy of such the decision to the licensee and a petition for review by an administrative law judge shall does not operate as a supersedeas.

(E) Misconduct, which constitutes grounds for revocation, suspension, fine, or other restriction of a license or a limitation on or other discipline of a licensee shall be is satisfactory showing to the board of any of the following:

(1) that any a false, fraudulent or forged statement or document has been used or any a fraudulent, deceitful or dishonest act has been practiced by the holder of a license in connection with any of the a licensing requirements requirement.;

(2) that the holder of a license has been convicted of a felony or any other crime involving fraud, drugs, or any of the laws relating to controlled substances, intoxicating liquors, or the unlawful sales of


Printed Page 2496 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

dangerous drugs as prohibited by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.;

(3) that the holder of a license uses alcohol or drugs to such a degree as to render him unfit to practice pharmacy.;

(4) that the holder of a license has been convicted of the illegal or unauthorized practice of pharmacy.;

(5) that the holder of a license has knowingly performed any an act which in any way assists an unlicensed person to violate any provisions of the pharmacy laws.;

(6) that the holder of a license has sustained any physical or mental disability, as determined by a physician, which renders further practice by him dangerous to the public.;

(7) that the holder of a license is guilty of engaging in any dishonorable, unethical, or unprofessional conduct that is likely to deceive, defraud, or harm the public.;

(8) that the holder of a license is guilty of the use of any intentionally fraudulent statement in any document connected with the practice of pharmacy.;

(9) that the holder of a license is guilty of obtaining fees or assisting in obtaining such fees under intentionally fraudulent circumstances.;

(10) that the holder of a license has intentionally violated or attempted to violate, directly or indirectly, or is assisting in or abetting the violating or conspiring to violate any provisions or terms of this chapter or any regulations promulgated under this chapter.;

(11) that the holder of a license has been found by the board to lack the ethical or professional competence to practice pharmacy.;

(12) that the holder of a license has practiced pharmacy while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicants.

(F) In addition to all other remedies and actions incorporated in this section, the license of any a pharmacist adjudged mentally incompetent by any a court of competent jurisdiction shall must be automatically suspended by the board until the pharmacist is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction or in any other manner provided by law as being restored to mental competency."/

Amend sections, totals and title to conform.

Senator GIESE explained the amendment.

Senator DRUMMOND moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.


Printed Page 2497 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

Amendment No. 238

Senator RICHTER proposed the following Amendment No. 238 (3362R305.LER), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, on page 601, after line 31, by adding a new section to read:

/SECTION .

TO AMEND SECTION 9-11-150, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO OPTIONAL FORMS OF RETIREMENT ALLOWANCES UNDER THE POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, SO AS TO ALLOW A MEMBER UNDER PARTICULAR OPTIONS TO RECEIVE A FULL RETIREMENT ALLOWANCE RATHER THAN A REDUCED ALLOWANCE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, AND TO AMEND SECTION 9-11-210, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SYSTEM, SO AS TO INCREASE THE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS OF CLASS ONE AND CLASS TWO MEMBERS BY ONE AND ONE TENTH PERCENT OF ONE PERCENT TO OFFSET THE ACTUARIAL COST OF THE ABOVE PROVISION.

A. Section 9-11-150 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 336 of 1992, is further amended to read:

"Section 9-11-150. Until the first payment on account of a retirement allowance becomes normally due, any member or beneficiary may elect, by filing with the system, to convert the retirement allowance otherwise payable on his account after retirement into a retirement allowance of equivalent value under one of the optional forms named below, the retirement allowance under the option selected being due and payable on the date of retirement:

Option 1. A reduced retirement allowance payable during the retired member's life, with the provision that the reduced allowance continues after his death to and for the life of the beneficiary, or to the trustee of the beneficiary, nominated by him by written designation duly acknowledged and filed with the board at the time of retirement, if the person survives him. To the extent the actuarial cost of the beneficiary's allowance provided under this option exceeds the cost of the member's benefit as provided under Option 2, the member's retirement allowance must be reduced to offset the actuarial cost in excess of the member's benefit as provided in Option 2;
Option 2. A reduced retirement allowance payable during the retired member's life, with the provision that it continues after his death at one-half the rate paid to him to and for the life of the beneficiary, or the trustee of the beneficiary, nominated by him by written designation duly


Printed Page 2498 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

acknowledged and filed with the board at the time of retirement, if the person survives him. The retirement allowance of the member under this option must be the allowance otherwise payable to him on his account without reduction, except that to the extent the actuarial cost of the beneficiary's allowance provided under this option exceeds fifteen percent of the member's maximum benefit, the member's retirement allowance must be reduced to offset the cost in excess of fifteen percent of the member's maximum benefit;

Option 3. Effective July 1, 1990, a retirement allowance of the amount that, with his benefit under Title II of the Federal Social Security Act, he will receive, so far as possible, approximately the same amount a year before and after the earliest age at which he becomes eligible, upon application therefor, to receive a Social Security benefit. Cost-of-living and other special increases in benefits are not applied to the amount advanced under this Option;

Option 4. A member may elect either Option 1 or 2 with the added provision that, if the designated beneficiary predeceases the member, the retirement allowance payable to the member after the designated beneficiary's death must be equal to the retirement allowance which would have been payable had the member not elected the option;

Option 5. A member may elect Option 1 or 2 with the added provision that the reduced retirement allowance after his death must be payable in equal shares to and for the life of each of two or more beneficiaries, or to the trustee or trustees of the beneficiaries, for so long as the beneficiary survives him. The benefit reduction factor must be based on the average age of the beneficiaries.

A member having elected Option 1, 2, or 4 and nominated his or her spouse to receive a retirement allowance upon the member's death may, after divorce from or death of his or her spouse, revoke the nomination and elect a new option effective on the first day of the month in which the new option is elected, providing for a retirement allowance computed to be the actuarial equivalent of the retirement allowance in effect immediately before the effective date of the new option. The election of a new option after the death of the member's spouse must be made before the later of July 1, 1992, or the first anniversary of the death of the spouse. A new option may be elected after a change in marital status.

A member who retired after under the provisions of Option 3 before July 1, 1990, may elect to have his benefit adjusted so that cost-of-living and other special increases in benefits are not applied to the amount of advance or reduction in allowance under this option after July 1, 1992, or the member's attainment of age sixty-two, if later, by making a special


Printed Page 2499 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

lump sum payment before that date. This lump sum payment must be equal to the excess, if any, of cost-of-living and other special increases in benefits actually paid to the member, over the increases that would have been paid had the member not elected an optional form of allowance. If a member does not elect to make the payment, his benefit must be automatically adjusted when no such excess exists, but not before July 1, 1992."

B. Section 9-11-210(1) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 424 of 1988, is further amended to read:

"(1) Each Class One member shall contribute to the system twenty-one dollars and eighteen cents a month during his service after becoming a member. Each Class Two member shall contribute to the system six and one-half seven and six tenths percent of his compensation."

C. Subsection A of this Section takes effect upon approval by the Governor and applies with respect to persons retiring on or after the effective date of this Section. Subsection B of this act takes effect upon approval by the Governor and applies with respect to contributions made after June 30, 1995./

Amend sections, totals and title to conform.

Senator RICHTER explained the amendment.

Senator DRUMMOND moved to lay the amendment on the table.

The amendment was laid on the table.

Amendment No. 235

Senators WILSON, THOMAS, RUSSELL, COURSON, GREGORY and MARTIN proposed the following Amendment No. 235 (GJK\21966SD.95), which was later tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered section to read:

/SECTION ___

TO AMEND SECTION 11-11-440 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE LIMITATION ON TAX INCREASES AND NEW TAXES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THE VOTING REQUIREMENT TO ENACT THE INCREASES AND NEW TAXES, AND TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 6-1-60 SO AS TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT BY
Printed Page 2500 . . . . . Friday, May 5, 1995

WHICH THE STATE'S POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS MAY INCREASE THE MILLAGE RATE AND DEFINE TERMS.


| Printed Page 2480, May 5 | Printed Page 2500, May 5 |

Page Finder Index

This web page was last updated on Monday, June 29, 2009 at 2:10 P.M.