Journal of the Senate
of the Second Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 9, 1996

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 3320, May 29 | Printed Page 3340, May 29 |

Printed Page 3330 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Senator MOORE proposed the following amendment (4782R001.TLM), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 5, after line 9, by adding appropriately numbered new SECTIONS to read:

/SECTION . Section 29-3-680 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 29-3-680. (A) In any real estate foreclosure proceeding a defendant against whom a personal judgment be is taken or asked, whether he has theretofore appeared in the action or not, may within thirty days after the sale of the mortgaged property apply by verified petition to the clerk of court in which the decree or order of sale was taken for an order of appraisal.

(B) Except in any real estate foreclosure proceeding relating to a dwelling place, as defined in Section 12-37-250, or to a consumer credit transaction, as defined in Section 37-1-301(11), a defendant against whom a personal judgment may be taken on a real estate secured transaction may waive the appraisal rights as provided by this section if the debtors, makers, borrowers, and/or guarantors are notified in writing before the transaction that a waiver of appraisal rights will be required and upon signing a statement during the transaction similar to the following:

`The laws of South Carolina provide that in any real estate foreclosure proceeding a defendant against whom a personal judgment is taken or asked may within thirty days after the sale of the mortgaged property apply to the court for an order of appraisal. The statutory appraisal value as approved by the court would be substituted for the high bid and may decrease the amount of any deficiency owing in connection with the transaction. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY WAIVES AND RELINQUISHES THE STATUTORY APPRAISAL RIGHTS WHICH MEANS THE HIGH BID AT THE JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE SALE WILL BE APPLIED TO THE DEBT REGARDLESS OF ANY APPRAISED VALUE OF THE MORTGAGED PROPERTY.'

This waiver may be in any document relating to the transaction; however, the required language must be on a page containing the signature of the person making the waiver and the capitalized sentence must be underlined, in capital letters, or disclosed in another prominent manner."

SECTION . Section 29-3-700 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 29-3-700. Upon the filing of such petition and deposit with the clerk of a sufficient sum to pay the costs of the subsequent proceedings he shall issue an order that the property be appraised at its true value as of the date of sale by three disinterested freeholders of the county in which the property is located individuals who must be state certified general real estate appraisers as defined in Section 40-60-20(20), state certified


Printed Page 3331 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

residential real estate appraisers as defined by Section 40-60-20(21), or state licensed real estate appraisers as defined by Section 40-60-20(22), who shall not be parties to the action or connected in business with or related by blood or marriage within the sixth degree to any such party."/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator MOORE explained the amendment.

The amendment was adopted.

There being no further amendments, the Bill was read the third time and ordered returned to the House of Representatives with amendments.

AMENDED, READ THE THIRD TIME

THIRD READING RECONSIDERED, OBJECTION

H. 4825 -- Rep. Boan: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 12-28-310, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE TAX ON GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE LICENSE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION IS IN LIEU OF ALL SALES, USE, OR OTHER EXCISE TAX WHICH MAY OTHERWISE BE IMPOSED BY ANY MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY, OR OTHER LOCAL POLITICAL SUBDIVISION; AND TO AMEND SECTION 12-28-2520, RELATING TO THE TAX ON MOTOR FUELS, REPORTS AND BOND REQUIREMENTS, AND OIL COMPANY BOND EXEMPTION BASED ON STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT "A MOTOR FUEL LICENSEE", RATHER THAN "AN OIL COMPANY", MAY FURNISH A STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND THAT IF IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY, THE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE "MOTOR FUEL LICENSEE", RATHER THAN "THE OIL COMPANY", IS SUFFICIENT TO PROTECT THE STATE IN THE PAYMENT OF ALL "MOTOR FUEL TAXES", RATHER THAN "GASOLINE TAXES", DUE, A BOND IS NOT REQUIRED; AND TO REPEAL SECTION 12-28-2510, RELATING TO THE TAX ON MOTOR FUELS AND THE ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GALLONS SOLD THROUGH RETAIL OUTLETS. (ABBREVIATED TITLE)

The Senate proceeded to a consideration of the Bill. The question being the third reading of the Bill.


Printed Page 3332 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Amendment No. 2

Senators THOMAS and ROSE proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (4825R006.DLT), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding the following new SECTIONS to be appropriately numbered to read:

/SECTION . Section 12-36-910(B)(1) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 361 of 1992, is further amended to read:

"(1) gross proceeds accruing or proceeding from the business of providing or furnishing any laundering, dry-cleaning, dyeing, or pressing service, but does not apply to the gross proceeds derived from coin-operated laundromats and dry-cleaning machines; provided, that beginning June 30, 1997, the sales tax shall not apply to these services in the manner provided in Section 12-36-2120;"

SECTION . Section 12-36-2120 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:

"( ) laundry, dry-cleaning, dyeing, and pressing services according to the following schedule:

(a) a sales tax of three percent of the gross proceeds of such sales shall be imposed beginning June 30, 1997;

(b) a sales tax of one percent of the gross proceeds of such sales shall be imposed beginning June 30, 1998; and

(c) no sales tax shall be imposed on such sales beginning June 30, 1999.

The term `laundry, dry-cleaning, dyeing, and pressing services' as used in this item does not include coin-operated laundromats and dry-cleaning machines which are exempt from the sales tax as provided in Section 12-36-910 and shall continue to be so exempt after the effective date of this item."

SECTION . A. Section 12-36-2120(24) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 506 of 1994, is further amended to read:

"(24) supplies and machinery used by laundries, cleaning, dyeing, or pressing, or establishments and supplies and machinery used by garment or other textile rental establishments in the direct performance of their primary function, but not sales of supplies and machinery used by coin-operated laundromats;"

B. This section takes effect July 1, 1998./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.


Printed Page 3333 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

Senator ROSE explained the amendment.

Senator ROSE moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.

Amendment No. 3

Senator MOORE proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (4825R007.TLM), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 7, SECTION 6, by deleting section 6 in its entirety.

Amend further, page 12, lines 12 and 13 as contained in SECTION 20 by striking the word /gasoline/ and inserting the words /all motor fuels/.

Amend further, page 12 by striking SECTION 23 in its entirety.

Amend further, page 14, by striking SECTION 27 in its entirety.

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator MOORE explained the amendment.

Senator MOORE moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.

There being no further amendments, the Bill was read the third time, passed and ordered returned to the House of Representatives with amendments.

Motion to Reconsider Adopted

Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator DRUMMOND moved to reconsider the vote whereby the Bill was given a third reading.

The motion to reconsider the vote whereby the Bill was given a third reading was adopted.

The question then was the third reading of the Bill.

Adoption of Amendment No. 2 Reconsidered

Amendment No. 2 Tabled

Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator DRUMMOND moved to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 2 (4825R006.DLT) proposed by Senators THOMAS and ROSE was adopted.

The motion to reconsider was adopted.


Printed Page 3334 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

The question then was the adoption of Amendment No. 2.

Senator DRUMMOND moved to lay Amendment No. 2 on the table.

Amendment No. 2 was laid on the table.

Recorded Vote

Senators GIESE, LANDER, ROSE and WILSON desired to be recorded as voting against the motion to table Amendment No. 2.

There being no further amendments, the Bill was read the third time, passed and ordered returned to the House of Representatives with amendments.

Objection

Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator ROSE moved to reconsider the vote whereby the Bill was given a third reading.

Senator PATTERSON objected.

Point of Personal Privilege

Senator ROSE rose to a Point of Personal Privilege.

On motion of Senator ROSE, with unanimous consent, the Bill was taken up for immediate consideration.

Senator ROSE spoke on the Bill.

Senator DRUMMOND spoke on the Bill.

Motion to Reconsider Adopted

Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator ROSE moved to reconsider the vote whereby the Bill was given a third reading.

The motion to reconsider was adopted.

Motion to Reconsider Adopted

Amendment No. 2

Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator ROSE moved to reconsider the vote whereby Amendment No. 2 was laid on the table.

The motion to reconsider was adopted.

The question then was the adoption of Amendment No. 2.

Senator DRUMMOND moved to table the amendment.


Printed Page 3335 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Ayes 11; Nays 30

AYES

Bryan               Courtney            Drummond
Glover              Jackson             Land
Matthews            Patterson           Saleeby
Smith, J.V.         Washington          
TOTAL--11

NAYS

Alexander            Boan                 Courson
Fair                 Giese                Gregory
Hayes                Holland              Hutto
Lander               Leventis             Martin
McConnell            McGill               Mescher
Moore                O'Dell               Passailaigue
Peeler               Rankin               Richter
Rose                 Russell              Ryberg
Setzler              Short                Smith, G.
Thomas               Waldrep              Wilson
TOTAL--30

The Senate refused to table the amendment. The question then was the adoption of Amendment No. 2.

Senator DRUMMOND objected to further consideration.

AMENDED, AMENDMENT PROPOSED, OBJECTION

H. 4445 -- Reps. Harrison, Baxley, Martin, D. Smith, Wofford, Jennings, Kelley and J. Young: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 1-23-320, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PROCEDURES IN CONTESTED CASES UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT ALL CONTESTED CASE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION; TO AMEND SECTION 1-23-330, RELATING TO EVIDENTIARY MATTERS IN CONTESTED CASES, SO AS TO


Printed Page 3336 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

PROVIDE THAT THE STANDARD OF PROOF SHALL BE THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE EXCEPT IN PROFESSIONAL LICENSING CASES IN WHICH THE STANDARD OF PROOF SHALL BE CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE; TO AMEND SECTION 1-23-570, RELATING TO THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DIVISION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE CHIEF JUDGE SHALL ASSIGN JUDGES TO HEAR ALL CASES RATHER THAN CONTESTED CASES COMING BEFORE THE DIVISION; TO AMEND SECTION 1-23-580, RELATING TO THE CLERK OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION AND OTHER SUPPORT STAFF, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHIEF JUDGE TO HIRE AND SUPERVISE CERTAIN SUPPORT STAFF, AND TO PROVIDE THAT EACH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY APPOINT, HIRE, CONTRACT, AND SUPERVISE AN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT AS INDIVIDUALLY ALLOTTED AND AUTHORIZED IN THE ANNUAL GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT; TO AMEND SECTION 1-23-650, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO RULES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THESE RULES AND THEIR PROMULGATION AND REVIEW; AND TO AMEND SECTION 48-39-160, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO JURISDICTION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT TO RESTRAIN VIOLATIONS OF COASTAL ZONE PROVISIONS, SO AS TO TRANSFER THIS JURISDICTION TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION.

The Senate proceeded to a consideration of the Bill. The question being the second reading of the Bill.

Amendment No. 1

Senator COURTNEY proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (JUD4445.001), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriated numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION ___. Section 1-23-650 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 452 of 1994, is further amended to read:

"Section 1-23-650. Rules governing the internal administration and operations of practice and procedure before the administrative law judge division shall be:


Printed Page 3337 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

(1) proposed by the chief judge of the division and adopted by a majority of the judges of the division; or

(2) proposed by any judge of the division and adopted by seventy-five percent of the judges of the division.

Each administrative law judge may appoint, hire, contract, and supervise the support staff he is individually allotted pursuant to Section 1-23-580(B). Rules governing practice and procedure before the division which are:

(1) consistent with the rules of procedure governing civil actions in courts of common pleas; and

(2) not otherwise expressed in Chapter 23 of Title 1 of the 1976 Code;

shall upon approval by a majority of the judges of the division be promulgated by the division, and shall be subject to review as are rules of procedure promulgated by the Supreme Court under Article V of the Constitution; provided, however, the division shall adopt the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure as its temporary rules of procedure to remain in effect until permanent rules are promulgated pursuant to this section during the 1995 session of the General Assembly."/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator COURTNEY explained the amendment.

Senator COURTNEY moved that the amendment be adopted.

The amendment was adopted.

Amendment No. 2

Senator RICHTER proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (4445R001.LER):

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 3, after line 31, by adding appropriately numbered new SECTIONS to read:

/SECTION . Section 1-11-140 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 1-11-140(A). The State Budget and Control Board, through the Office of Insurance Services, is authorized to provide insurance for the State, its departments, agencies, institutions, commissions, boards, and the personnel employed by the State in its departments, agencies, institutions, commissions, and boards so as to protect the State against tort liability and to protect these personnel against tort liability arising in the course of their employment. The insurance also may be provided for physicians or dentists employed by the State, its departments, agencies, institutions,


Printed Page 3338 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

commissions, or boards against any tort liability arising out of the rendering of any professional services as a physician or dentist for which no fee is charged or professional services rendered of any type whatsoever so long as any fees received are directly payable to the employer of a covered physician or dentist, or to any practice plan authorized by the employer whether or not the practice plan is incorporated and registered with the Secretary of State; provided, any insurance coverage provided by the Budget and Control Board may be on the basis of claims made or upon occurrences. The insurance also may be provided for students of high schools, South Carolina Technical Schools, or state-supported colleges and universities while these students are engaged in work study, distributive education, or apprentice programs on the premises of private companies. Premiums for the insurance must be paid from appropriations to or funds collected by the various entities, except that in the case of the above-referenced students in which case the premiums must be paid from fees paid by students participating in these training programs. The board has the exclusive control over the investigation, settlement, and defense of claims against the various entities and personnel for whom it provided insurance coverage and may promulgate regulations in connection therewith."

SECTION . The second paragraph of Section 15-78-30(c) of the 1976 Code is further amended to read:

"On or after January 1, 1989, `Employee' means any officer, employee, or agent of the State or its political subdivisions, including elected or appointed officials, law enforcement officers, and persons acting on behalf or in service of a governmental entity in the scope of official duty, whether with or without compensation, but the term does not include an independent contractor doing business with the State or any political subdivision thereof. Custody of prisoners by the State or any of its political subdivisions does not in and of itself create an employer and employee relationship between the State and the prisoner. Provided, the provisions of this section shall in no way limit or modify the liability of a licensed physician or dentist, acting within the scope of his profession, with respect to any action or claim brought hereunder which involved services for which the physician or dentist was paid, should have been paid, or expected to be paid at the time of the rendering of the services from any source other than the salary appropriated by the governmental entity or fees received from any practice plan authorized by the employer whether or not the practice plan is incorporated and registered with the Secretary of State."


Printed Page 3339 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

SECTION . The second paragraph of Section 15-78-70(c) of the 1976 Code is further amended to read:

"On or after January 1, 1989, a person, when bringing an action against a governmental entity under the provisions of this chapter, shall name as a party defendant only the agency or political subdivision for which the employee was acting and is not required to name the employee individually, unless the agency or political subdivision for which the employee was acting cannot be determined at the time the action is instituted. In the event that the employee is individually named, the agency or political subdivision for which the employee was acting must be substituted as the party defendant. The provisions of this section in no way shall limit or modify the liability of a licensed physician or dentist, acting within the scope of his profession, with respect to any action or claim brought hereunder which involved services for which the physician or dentist was paid, should have been paid, or expected to be paid at the time of the rendering of the services from any source other than the salary appropriated by the governmental entity or fees received from any practice plan authorized by the employer whether or not the practice plan is incorporated and registered with the Secretary of State."

SECTION . Section 15-78-120(a)(5) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"(5) The provisions of Section 15-78-120(a)(3) and (a)(4) shall in no way limit or modify the liability of a licensed physician or dentist, acting within the scope of his profession, with respect to any action or claim brought hereunder which involved services for which the physician or dentist was paid, should have been paid, or expected to be paid at the time of the rendering of the services from any source other than the salary appropriated by the governmental entity or fees received from any practice plan authorized by the employer whether or not the practice plan is incorporated and registered with the Secretary of State."/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator LAND objected to further consideration of the Bill.

RECALLED FROM ORANGEBURG COUNTY DELEGATION

HOUSE AMENDMENTS AMENDED

RETURNED TO THE HOUSE WITH AMENDMENTS

S. 1375 -- Senator Matthews: A BILL TO PROVIDE THAT ORANGEBURG COUNTY ON JULY 1, 1997, SHALL CONSIST OF THREE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICTS, EACH TO BE


Printed Page 3340 . . . . . Wednesday, May 29, 1996

COMPOSED OF CERTAIN OF THE EIGHT PRESENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY WITH THESE EIGHT PRESENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY BEING ABOLISHED ON JULY 1, 1997; TO PROVIDE THAT EACH CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY A BOARD OF TRUSTEES WHO SHALL BE ELECTED IN NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS ON SPECIFIED DATES; TO PROVIDE FOR THE COMPOSITION AND MANNER OF ELECTION OF EACH CONSOLIDATED BOARD; TO ESTABLISH AN ORANGEBURG COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ON JULY 1, 1997, TO BE COMPOSED OF SEVEN MEMBERS ELECTED IN NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED; TO PROVIDE FOR THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COUNTY BOARD AND THE CONSOLIDATED BOARDS; TO PROVIDE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH SCHOOL BUDGETS MUST BE PREPARED AND SCHOOL TAX MILLAGE DETERMINED AND LEVIED; TO AUTHORIZE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR SCHOOL YEAR 1997-98 ONLY TO ENCOURAGE THE RETIREMENT OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL CURRENTLY WORKING BEYOND RETIREMENT AGE; TO PROVIDE FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE EIGHT PRESENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO THE COUNTY BOARD WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS; TO PROVIDE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEBT LIMITATION OF THE COUNTY BOARD FOR THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS MUST BE DETERMINED; AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE REALIZATION OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE COST SAVINGS BY JULY 1, 2000.


| Printed Page 3320, May 29 | Printed Page 3340, May 29 |

Page Finder Index

This web page was last updated on Monday, June 29, 2009 at 1:59 P.M.