Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
H. 3222
STATUS INFORMATION
Concurrent Resolution
Sponsors: Reps. Bedingfield, Gullick, Erickson, Crawford, Duncan, Allison, Ballentine, Cato, Forrester, Hamilton, Harrell, Harrison, Horne, Kelly, Littlejohn, Millwood, Nanney, E.H. Pitts, M.A. Pitts, Rice, D.C. Smith, G.R. Smith, J.R. Smith, Stringer, A.D. Young, T.R. Young, Daning, Owens, Umphlett, Wylie, Parker and Clemmons
Document Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7112zw09.docx
Introduced in the House on January 13, 2009
Introduced in the Senate on February 12, 2009
Currently residing in the Senate
Summary: Congressional Delegation
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/13/2009 House Introduced HJ-112
1/13/2009 House Referred to Committee on Invitations and Memorial
Resolutions HJ-112
1/15/2009 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Daning
1/29/2009 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Owens
2/5/2009 House Committee report: Favorable Invitations and Memorial
Resolutions HJ-2
2/6/2009 Scrivener's error corrected
2/10/2009 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Umphlett
2/11/2009 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Wylie
2/11/2009 House Debate interrupted HJ-26
2/11/2009 House Debate adjourned until Thursday, February 12, 2009 HJ-42
2/12/2009 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Parker, Clemmons
2/12/2009 House Adopted, sent to Senate HJ-36
2/12/2009 House Roll call Yeas-72 Nays-33 HJ-36
2/12/2009 House Motion to reconsider tabled HJ-37
2/12/2009 Senate Introduced SJ-8
2/12/2009 Senate Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
SJ-8
5/12/2009 Senate Committee report: Majority favorable, minority
unfavorable Labor, Commerce and Industry SJ-9
View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
1/13/2009
2/5/2009
2/6/2009
5/12/2009
COMMITTEE REPORT
May 12, 2009
H. 3222
Introduced by Reps. Bedingfield, Gullick, Erickson, Crawford, Duncan, Allison, Ballentine, Cato, Forrester, Hamilton, Harrell, Harrison, Horne, Kelly, Littlejohn, Millwood, Nanney, E.H. Pitts, M.A. Pitts, Rice, D.C. Smith, G.R. Smith, J.R. Smith, Stringer, A.D. Young, T.R. Young, Daning, Owens, Umphlett, Wylie, Parker and Clemmons
S. Printed 5/12/09--S.
Read the first time February 12, 2009.
To whom was referred a Concurrent Resolution (H. 3222) memorializing the South Carolina Congressional Delegation to oppose legislation that disenfranchises South Carolina workers by removing their right to a private ballot union, etc., respectfully
That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass:
Majority favorable. Minority unfavorable.
W. GREG RYBERG PHIL P. LEVENTIS
For Majority. For Minority.
MEMORIALIZING THE SOUTH CAROLINA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO OPPOSE LEGISLATION THAT DISENFRANCHISES SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS BY REMOVING THEIR RIGHT TO A PRIVATE BALLOT UNION ELECTION.
Whereas, the right to a private ballot when voting on external representation is fundamentally inherent in our representative Republic and shall not be infringed upon; and
Whereas, South Carolina taxpayers spend tremendous resources to foster and support free elections at home and abroad, and it makes no sense to roll back the clock on our own workplace elections by abolishing federally protected private ballots; and
Whereas, the first right-to-work laws in South Carolina were adopted in 1954; and
Whereas, South Carolina's right-to-work laws give the State a distinct advantage when recruiting new industry and business; and
Whereas, passing the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) will replace a federally supervised private ballot election with a system that facilitates coercion and intimidation, known as "card check", whereby employees publically sign cards to vote for unionization; and
Whereas, the Chairman of the United States House Committee on Education and Labor, Representative George Miller, a staunch supporter of the American "card check" bill, sent a letter to Mexican government officials which stated, "...we feel that the private ballot is absolutely necessary in order to ensure workers are not intimidated into voting for a union they may otherwise not choose."; and
Whereas, the bill would leave South Carolina employees vulnerable to harassment, misinformation, labor union pressure, and would ultimately have a significant negative impact on the South Carolina small business community; and
Whereas, small businesses are less likely to have labor counsel and are more susceptible to the complicated legal restrictions employers face during union organizing drives; and
Whereas, this legislation departs from over six decades of precedent established by the National Labor Relations Act by imposing contract terms on private employers through a process of compulsory binding arbitration; and
Whereas, the mandatory binding arbitration provisions of the EFCA deny workers the right to participate in the collective bargaining process between employees and the union. Now, therefore,
Be it resolved by the South Carolina House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:
That the members of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, find that so-called "card check" legislation such as the "Employee Free Choice Act" is detrimental to the rights of South Carolina workers, is an offense against democratic principles, and urge all members of the South Carolina Congressional Delegation to support worker freedom by opposing the EFCA and any of its components in 2009 and in future years.
Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to each member of the South Carolina Congressional Delegation, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and the President of the United States Senate.
This web page was last updated on Monday, November 23, 2009 at 2:52 P.M.