South Carolina General Assembly
112th Session, 1997-1998

Bill 32


Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter


                    Current Status

Bill Number:                       32
Type of Legislation:               General Bill GB
Introducing Body:                  Senate
Introduced Date:                   19970114
Primary Sponsor:                   Holland 
All Sponsors:                      Holland 
Drafted Document Number:           s-jud\holland\jud9001.dhh
Residing Body:                     Senate
Current Committee:                 Judiciary Committee 11 SJ
Subject:                           Magistrate and municipal court
                                   judge may order mental evaluation of
                                   fitness to stand trial, Courts,
                                   Mental Health



History


Body    Date      Action Description                       Com     Leg Involved
______  ________  _______________________________________  _______ ____________

Senate  19970114  Introduced, read first time,             11 SJ
                  referred to Committee

View additional legislative information at the LPITS web site.


(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTION 44-23-410, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE CAPACITY OF PERSONS CHARGED WITH CRIME TO STAND TRIAL, SO AS TO ALLOW MAGISTRATE AND MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES TO ORDER MENTAL EVALUATION OF A PERSON CHARGED WITH A CRIMINAL OFFENSE OR CIVIL CONTEMPT TO DETERMINE FITNESS TO STAND TRIAL.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. Section 44-23-410 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 44-23-410. Whenever a judge of the Circuit Court circuit court, or Family Court family court, magistrate court, or municipal court has reason to believe that a person on trial before him, charged with the commission of a criminal offense or civil contempt, is not fit to stand trial because the person lacks the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his own defense as a result of a lack of mental capacity, the judge shall:

(1) order examination of the person by two examiners designated by the Department of Mental Health if the person is suspected of having a mental illness or designated by the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs if the person is suspected of being mentally retarded or having a related disability or by both sets of examiners if the person is suspected of having both mental illness and mental retardation or a related disability; the examination must be made within fifteen days after the receipt of the court's order and may be conducted in any suitable place unless otherwise designated by the court; or

(2) order the person committed for examination and observation to an appropriate facility of the Department of Mental Health or the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs for a period not to exceed fifteen days. If at the end of fifteen days the examiners have been unable to determine whether the person is fit to stand trial, the director of the facility shall request in writing an additional period for observation not to exceed fifteen days. If the person or his counsel requests, the person may be examined additionally by a designated examiner of his choice. The report of the examination is admissible as evidence in subsequent hearings pursuant to Section 44-23-430. However, the court may prescribe the time and conditions under which the independent examination is conducted. If the examiners designated by the Department of Mental Health find indications of mental retardation or a related disability but not mental illness, the department shall not render an evaluation on the person's mental capacity, but shall inform the court that the person is `not mentally ill' and recommend that the person should be evaluated for competency to stand trial by the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs. If the examiners designated by the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs find indications of mental illness but not mental retardation or a related disability, the department shall not render an evaluation on the person's mental capacity, but shall inform the court that the person does `not have mental retardation or a related disability' and recommend that the person should be evaluated for competency to stand trial by the Department of Mental Health. If either the Department of Mental Health or the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs finds a preliminary indication of a dual diagnosis of mental illness and mental retardation or a related disability, this preliminary finding must be reported to the court with the recommendation that one examiner from the Department of Mental Health and one examiner from the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs be designated to further evaluate the person and render a final report on his mental capacity."

SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

-----XX-----