Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
H. 4497
STATUS INFORMATION
Concurrent Resolution
Sponsors: Rep. Viers
Document Path: l:\council\bills\ggs\22402sd10.docx
Companion/Similar bill(s): 1095
Introduced in the House on February 2, 2010
Currently residing in the House Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs
Summary: Fishing area closures
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2/2/2010 House Introduced HJ-82
2/2/2010 House Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources
and Environmental Affairs HJ-83
View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
TO OPPOSE ANY FISHING AREA CLOSURES OFF THE COAST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOUTH ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT 17A TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SNAPPER GROUPER FISHERY OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION.
Whereas, the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) is considering Amendment 17A to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region to end possible overfishing of red snapper; and
Whereas, an alternative tentatively supported by the SAFMC in Amendment 17A is a nine thousand six hundred seventy-eight square mile area in the South Atlantic closed to fishing, of which about three thousand five hundred square miles are off the coast of South Carolina, stretching north from the border with Georgia to near McClellanville; and
Whereas, red snapper landings in South Carolina account for only eleven percent of the total red snapper landings in the South Atlantic region; and
Whereas, the National Marine Fisheries Service has already imposed a total closure of the red snapper fishery; and
Whereas, recreational and commercial saltwater fishing is vital to the coastal economy of South Carolina and employs thousands of state residents directly and indirectly; and
Whereas, according to a 2008 University of South Carolina study, coastal tourism in South Carolina had a total economic impact of over seven billion dollars, employed nearly eighty-one thousand South Carolinians, and generated over two billion dollars in salary and wages; and
Whereas, according to a 2006 American Sportfishing Association study, saltwater fishing in South Carolina had a total economic impact of over one billion dollars, employed nearly twelve thousand South Carolinians, and generated over three hundred thirty-three million dollars in salary and wages; and
Whereas, according to a 2008 University of South Carolina study, commercial fishing in South Carolina had a total economic impact of nearly thirty-four million dollars, employed nearly seven hundred South Carolinians, and generated nearly thirteen million dollars in salary and wages; and
Whereas, any area closed to fishing off the coast of South Carolina proposed by the SAFMC in Amendment 17A is unjustifiable and would cause severe economic hardship to the State and its coastal counties, including significant loss of jobs for South Carolinians at a time when job creation is badly needed and is a priority for the State; and
Whereas, any area closed to fishing off the coast of South Carolina will result in excessive fishing pressure displaced upon the remaining open areas, causing localized depletion of fish species, further seriously impacting fishermen, employment, and the local economy; and
Whereas, the State of South Carolina, through its Department of Natural Resources controls a vote on the SAFMC; and
Whereas, South Carolina has two additional representatives that are voting members of the SAFMC. Now, therefore,
Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:
That the General Assembly of South Carolina, by this resolution, declares its opposition to the closing of any areas to fishing off the coast of South Carolina associated with the SAFMC's proposed Amendment 17A to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region. The General Assembly of South Carolina urges the SAFMC not to adopt any version of Amendment 17A that includes any areas closed to any type of fishing off the coast of South Carolina and request and urges the SAFMC vote controlled by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources be cast accordingly. The two other representatives of South Carolina on the SAFMC are strongly urged by the General Assembly also to cast votes in opposition to any version of Amendment 17A that includes any areas closed to any fishing off this state's coast.
Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, all South Carolina representatives on the SAFMC, the SAFMC, and the National Marine Fisheries Service.
This web page was last updated on February 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM