Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
Sponsors: Reps. McCoy, Harrell and Merrill
Document Path: l:\council\bills\nl\13339dg13.docx
Companion/Similar bill(s): 723
Introduced in the House on May 30, 2013
Introduced in the Senate on June 5, 2014
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary
Summary: Special purpose districts
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5/30/2013 House Introduced and read first time (House Journal-page 48) 5/30/2013 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary (House Journal-page 48) 4/30/2014 House Recalled from Committee on Judiciary (House Journal-page 53) 4/30/2014 House Member(s) request name removed as sponsor: R.L.Brown 5/1/2014 House Debate adjourned until Wed., 5-14-14 (House Journal-page 35) 5/14/2014 House Debate adjourned until Thur., 5-15-14 (House Journal-page 16) 5/15/2014 House Debate adjourned until Thur., 5-29-14 (House Journal-page 27) 5/29/2014 House Debate adjourned until Tues., 6-3-14 (House Journal-page 45) 6/3/2014 House Read second time (House Journal-page 77) 6/3/2014 House Roll call Yeas-65 Nays-20 (House Journal-page 78) 6/4/2014 House Debate adjourned until Thur., 6-5-14 (House Journal-page 11) 6/5/2014 House Read third time and sent to Senate (House Journal-page 19) 6/5/2014 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal-page 4) 6/5/2014 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal-page 4)
View the latest legislative information at the website
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
April 30, 2014
S. Printed 4/30/14--H.
Read the first time May 30, 2013.
TO AMEND SECTION 5-3-310, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR ANNEXATION OF SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF ANNEXATION BY RESOLUTION OF A SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT WHEN A PREEXISTING MUNICIPALITY ANNEXES A MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION OF THE DISTRICT OR WHEN A MUNICIPALITY INCORPORATES A MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION OF A DISTRICT.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Whereas, the Constitution of the State of South Carolina encourages and fosters home rule wherever possible, providing that matters of local interest be decided by the persons most impacted by the decision, and encourages communities of interest to unite together where it is possible to do so; and
Whereas, Sections 5-3-300 through 5-3-315 of the South Carolina Code of Laws contemplate a municipality providing services within its corporate limits that were formerly provided by a special purpose district; and
Whereas, the plan formulated in Section 5-3-312 allows for possible provision of services by the municipality to any remaining unannexed portion of the district; and
Whereas, allowing annexation of the remainder of the special purpose district would allow voters in that portion of that district to have representation in the municipal government and provide for a greater community of interest for provision of services; and
Whereas, special purpose districts may already provide services throughout the district despite often minor breaks in contiguity; and
Whereas, in Tovey v. City of Charleston, 237 S.C. 475, 484, 117 S.E.2d 872, 875 (1961), the South Carolina Supreme Court held that there is no requirement of compactness or unity or regularity of shape of the boundaries of a municipality and that such matters are best left to the determination of the elected officials and voters of the municipality and the territory proposed to be annexed; and
Whereas, mere irregularity in shape furnishes no justification for interference by the courts in the determination by local elected officials and voters that an annexation is to the best interest of both the municipality and the area to be annexed; and
Whereas, it is a matter best left to the elected officials and voters of the municipality and the area to be annexed whether the contemplated addition is readily accessible to the municipality or whether the contemplated annexation would cause any difficulties in the administration of the affairs of the municipality or result in any undue hardship to any citizen; and
Whereas, advances in technology, transportation, and communication, among others, have eliminated the advantage once obtained by immediate contiguity of areas within a municipality as to the provision of services and homogeneity of communities, as decades of practice by the municipalities of this State have proven; and
Whereas, practice over past decades demonstrates that crossing areas in an intervening municipality provides an efficient route for the provision of services to areas included in a different municipality and offers no insult to the sovereignty of the intervening municipality, and thus presents no rational impediment to the annexation of areas separated by the intervening municipality. Now, therefore,
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Section 5-3-310 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"Section 5-3-310. (A) When all or part of the area of a special purpose district as defined in Section 6-11-1610 or a special taxing district created pursuant to Section 4-9-30 or Section 4-19-10, et seq. or an assessment district created pursuant to Chapter 15 of Title 6, or any other special purpose district or special taxing or assessment district is annexed into a municipality under the provisions of Section 5-3-150 or 5-3-300, the following provisions apply:
(1) At the time of annexation or at any time thereafter the municipality may elect at its sole option to provide the service formerly provided by the district within the annexed area. The transfer of service rights must be made pursuant to a plan formulated under the provisions of Sections 5-3-300 through 5-3-315.
(2) Until the municipality upon reasonable written notice elects to displace the district's service, the district must be allowed to continue providing service within the district's annexed area.
(3) Annexation does not divest the district of any property; however, subject to the provisions of item (4) below, real or tangible personal property located within the area annexed must be transferred to the municipality pursuant to a plan formulated under the provisions of Sections 5-3-300 through 5-3-315.
(4) In any case in which the municipality annexes less than the total service area of the district, the district may, at its sole discretion, retain ownership and control of any asset, within or without the annexed area, used by or intended to be used by residents within the district's unannexed area or used or intended to be used to provide service to residents in the unannexed area of the district.
(5) Upon annexation of less than the total area of the district, the district's boundaries must be modified, if at all, by the plan formulated pursuant to the provisions of Sections 5-3-300 through 5-3-315. The plan must specify the new boundaries of the district.
(B) In addition to the provisions of subsection (A), if a municipality annexes an area which includes the majority of the population or registered voters of a special purpose, special taxing district, then the district, at its sole discretion and after a public hearing, may petition the municipality by resolution to annex the remaining unincorporated portion of the district. This method of annexation is in addition to any other provided by law.
(1) Contiguity of the municipality with any part of the district, including any part already incorporated in the municipality, is sufficient to allow annexation of the entire remainder of the district regardless of any break in contiguity in the area where the district currently provides services.
(2) After receiving a petition by resolution from the district, the municipality, at its sole discretion and after public hearing, may annex the remainder of the district by ordinance.
(3) No less than thirty days prior to the final reading of the ordinance for annexation, the municipality must publish in a newspaper of general circulation within the municipality and the district a notice containing:
(a) a description of the area to be annexed;
(b) the act or code section pursuant to which the proposed annexation is to be accomplished;
(c) a statement that the municipal council will approve the annexation of the area unless a petition signed by five percent or more of the qualified electors of the area to be annexed is presented to the district commission within thirty days from the date of the notice requesting that the district commission order an election to be held on the question of annexation in the area proposed to be annexed.
(4) The municipal council may give final reading approval to an ordinance declaring the area annexed not less than thirty days from the date of the publication of the notice required by item (3). However, if within thirty days from the date of the publication of the notice required by item (3), a petition meeting the requirements of item (3) is presented to the district commission, the municipal council shall delay final reading and approval of the ordinance declaring the area annexed until the result of any such election is published.
(5) If within thirty days from the date of the publication of the notice required in item (3), a petition is presented to the district commission requesting an election to be held within the area to be annexed on the question of annexation, the district commission shall notify the municipality, and after verifying that at least five percent of the qualified electors within the area proposed to be annexed have signed the petition, shall certify that fact to the county election commission which shall order an election. The county election commission shall give at least thirty days' notice prior to the date set for the election by publishing the notice of election in a newspaper of general circulation within the municipality and the district. Registered qualified electors residing within the area to be annexed shall have the same qualifications to vote in this election as are required of registered qualified electors to vote in the state and county general elections. The county election commission shall certify the result of the election to the district commission and the municipality.
(6) If a majority of the votes cast by the qualified electors of the area to be annexed are in opposition to the annexation, the municipal council shall publish the result of the election and table the proposed ordinance. If a majority of the votes cast by the qualified electors of the area to be annexed are in favor of the annexation, the municipal council shall give final reading approval to the ordinance declaring the area annexed.
(C) If the remainder of the district is annexed by the municipality according to the provisions of subsection (B), any plan for the transfer of services from the district to the municipality described in Sections 5-3-311 through 5-3-315, shall be formulated after all areas of the district have had an opportunity to vote for the election of municipal officers. Until such municipal elections have been held, the district must be allowed to continue to provide services in the entire area of the district incorporated in the district.
(D) For purposes of subsection (B), a municipality initially incorporated so that it includes all or part of a district existing at the time of incorporation shall be considered as having annexed that same portion of the district."
SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
This web page was last updated on June 6, 2014 at 10:50 AM