Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 110th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 11, 1994

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 3280, Mar. 10 | Printed Page 3300, Mar. 10 |

Printed Page 3290 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

B. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. ROGERS explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. G. BAILEY a temporary leave of absence.

Reps. KEYSERLING, McELVEEN, BEATTY, COBB-HUNTER, RICHARDSON, GRAHAM, CORNING and CANTY proposed the following Amendment No. 261 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5731HTC.94), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, Permanent Provisions, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION ___

TO AMEND SECTION 12-36-2120, AS AMENDED, OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO SALES TAX EXEMPTIONS, SO AS TO DELETE THE EXEMPTION FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES SOLD BY THE OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES TO STATE AGENCIES IF THE TAX WAS PAID AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE; TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 12-36-2125 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE MAXIMUM SALES TAX PROVISIONS AND SALES TAX EXEMPTIONS EXPIRE AFTER JUNE 30, 1996, UNLESS EXTENDED IN THE ANNUAL GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT BY A SEPARATE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE IN EACH HOUSE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND TO PROVIDE THAT ANY EXTENSION MAY APPLY FOR NO MORE THAN THREE FISCAL YEARS AND TO ESTABLISH THE SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND PROVIDE FOR ITS MEMBERSHIP AND DUTIES.

A. Section 12-36-2120(30) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"(30) Reserved office supplies, or other commodities, and services resold by the Division of General Services of the State Budget and Control Board to departments and agencies of the state government, if the tax was paid on the divisions original purchase;"

B. Article 21, Chapter 36, Title 12 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 12-36-2125. The maximum tax provisions of Section 12-36-2110 and the sales and use tax exemptions allowed pursuant to Sections 12-36-2120 and 12-36-2130, not including Section 12-36-2120(1),


Printed Page 3291 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

expire for sales after June 30, 1996. The maximum tax and sales and use tax exemptions provided in these sections may be extended for no more than three fiscal years in a provision in the annual general appropriations act receiving a separate affirmative vote in each house of the General Assembly.

C. There is created the Sales and Use Tax Exemption Review Committee consisting of the respective chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and House Ways and Means Committee, the Speaker of the House, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Consumer Advocate, the Commissioner of Agriculture, and the Director of the Department of Commerce. This committee annually shall report to the General Assembly on the economic impact and utility of the various sales and use tax exemptions.

D. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. KEYSERLING explained the amendment.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. KIRSH raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 261 was out of order as it was not germane.

Rep. KEYSERLING argued contra the Point.

The SPEAKER stated that it repealed an exemption presently existing and he overruled the Point of Order.

Rep. KIRSH moved to table the amendment.

Rep. KEYSERLING demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 66; Nays 25

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Alexander, T.C.  Allison          Baker
Barber           Boan             Brown, G.
Brown, H.        Cato             Chamblee
Clyborne         Cooper           Davenport
Elliott          Farr             Gamble
Gonzales         Hallman          Harrell
Harris, P.       Harrison         Harvin
Harwell          Hines            Houck
Huff             Hutson           Jaskwhich

Printed Page 3292 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Jennings         Keegan           Kelley
Kinon            Kirsh            Klauber
Koon             Law              Littlejohn
Marchbanks       McCraw           McKay
McLeod           Meacham          Moody-Lawrence
Neilson          Rhoad            Riser
Robinson         Scott            Sharpe
Shissias         Simrill          Smith, R.
Snow             Stone            Sturkie
Thomas           Trotter          Tucker
Vaughn           Walker           Wilder, J.
Wilkins          Witherspoon      Wofford
Worley           Wright           Young, A.

Total--66

Those who voted in the negative are:

Breeland         Brown, J.        Canty
Corning          Delleney         Graham
Harrelson        Inabinett        Keyserling
McElveen         McTeer           Neal
Phillips         Richardson       Rudnick
Sheheen          Spearman         Stille
Stuart           Waites           Wells
Whipper          White            Wilder, D.
Wilkes

Total--25

So, the amendment was tabled.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. TUCKER a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.

Rep. WAITES proposed the following Amendment No. 263 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3301BDW.94), which was rejected.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:


Printed Page 3293 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

/SECTION __
TO AMEND SECTION 56-3-195 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE COUNTY REQUIREMENT TO MAIL MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND LICENSING RENEWAL NOTICES, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISIONS FOR THE START-UP COSTS OF THE SECTION AND PROVIDE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND TAXATION TO FUND THE COSTS OF PREPARING, PRINTING, AND MAILING THE NOTICES; AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE INITIAL FUNDING OF THE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 56-3-195.

A. Section 56-3-195 of the 1976 Code, as added by Section 22A, Part II, Act 164 of 1993, is amended to read:

"Section 56-3-195. (A) Beginning on July 1, 1994, each county shall mail motor vehicle registration and licensing renewal notices to the owners of vehicles in the county as determined by the Division of Motor Vehicles of the department no later than forty-five days before expiration of the registration. The renewal notices, including the fees upon completion, may be returned to that county which shall transmit the renewal notices to the department for processing and which shall transmit the fees to the appropriate state fund as provided by law within seven days of receipt.

(B) Each county shall must have access to the motor vehicle registration and licensing records of the department as applicable to the county in the manner the county and department agree for the purpose of the county performing the functions required in subsection (A).

(C) Counties must not be charged online access network fees for driver and vehicle information.

(D) The department will shall fund the start-up costs for to the counties not to exceed a total of one million dollars inclusive to all counties. The start-up cost includes hardware, software, training, and other associated costs all of which must be approved by the department of preparing, printing, and mailing motor vehicle registration and licensing renewal notices by paying to or allowing the counties to retain one dollar of each motor vehicle registration and licensing renewal fee for every notice mailed pursuant to subsection (A)."

B. The Department of Revenue and Taxation may shift funds among its 1994-95 General Appropriations Act line items, upon approval of the State Budget and Control Board, to initially fund the amendment to Section 56-3-195 of the 1976 Code, amended in subsection A.

C. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.


Printed Page 3294 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Rep. WAITES explained the amendment.

Rep. BOAN moved to table the amendment, which was not agreed to by a division vote of 26 to 44.

Rep. BOAN spoke against the amendment.

The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.

Rep. BOAN demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 25; Nays 72

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Brown, J.        Byrd             Elliott
Fair             Farr             Gamble
Harrelson        Harris, P.       Harwell
Kinon            Littlejohn       McTeer
Neal             Rhoad            Scott
Sheheen          Stoddard         Stuart
Waites           Wilder, D.       Wilder, J.
Wilkes           Williams         Wofford
Young, A.

Total--25

Those who voted in the negative are:

Alexander, M.O.  Alexander, T.C.  Allison
Anderson         Askins           Baker
Barber           Baxley           Boan
Breeland         Brown, H.        Cato
Chamblee         Clyborne         Cobb-Hunter
Corning          Davenport        Delleney
Felder           Fulmer           Govan
Graham           Hallman          Harrell
Harris, J.       Harrison         Harvin
Hines            Hodges           Holt
Huff             Hutson           Inabinett
Jaskwhich        Jennings         Keegan
Kelley           Kirsh            Klauber
Koon             Law              Marchbanks
Mattos           McAbee           McCraw
McKay            McMahand         Meacham
Moody-Lawrence   Neilson          Phillips

Printed Page 3295 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Quinn            Riser            Robinson
Rogers           Rudnick          Shissias
Simrill          Smith, D.        Smith, R.
Spearman         Stille           Stone
Sturkie          Thomas           Trotter
Vaughn           Waldrop          Walker
Wells            Worley           Wright

Total--72

So, the amendment was rejected.

AMENDMENT NO. 267--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. QUINN proposed the following Amendment No. 267 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3300BDW.94).

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION ___
TO REPEAL ARTICLE 37, CHAPTER 5, TITLE 56, OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE INSPECTION OF VEHICLES.

A. Article 37, Chapter 5, Title 56 of the 1976 Code is repealed.

B. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. QUINN explained the amendment.

Rep. BOAN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. QUINN demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 45; Nays 57

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Alexander, M.O.  Anderson         Askins
Baxley           Boan             Breeland
Brown, H.        Chamblee         Cobb-Hunter
Cromer           Felder           Gamble
Govan            Harris, J.       Harris, P.
Harvin           Harwell          Hines
Hodges           Holt             Inabinett
Jennings         Keegan           Kennedy
Keyserling       Kinon            Kirsh

Printed Page 3296 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Mattos           McAbee           McCraw
McMahand         McTeer           Moody-Lawrence
Rogers           Simrill          Spearman
Stoddard         Stuart           Waites
Whipper          White            Wilder, D.
Wilkins          Williams         Wofford

Total--45

Those who voted in the negative are:

Alexander, T.C.  Allison          Baker
Barber           Brown, G.        Brown, J.
Cato             Clyborne         Cooper
Corning          Davenport        Delleney
Elliott          Fair             Fulmer
Graham           Hallman          Harrell
Harrelson        Harrison         Haskins
Houck            Jaskwhich        Kelley
Klauber          Koon             Law
Marchbanks       McLeod           Meacham
Neal             Neilson          Phillips
Quinn            Rhoad            Riser
Robinson         Rudnick          Scott
Sharpe           Sheheen          Shissias
Smith, D.        Smith, R.        Snow
Stille           Stone            Sturkie
Thomas           Trotter          Vaughn
Wells            Wilder, J.       Wilkes
Worley           Wright           Young, A.

Total--57

So, the House refused to table the amendment.

Rep. SPEARMAN spoke against the amendment.

Rep. BOAN moved to adjourn debate upon the amendment, which was adopted.


Printed Page 3297 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Rep. LITTLEJOHN proposed the following Amendment No. 268 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3308BDW.94), which was adopted.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION __
TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 56-3-2323 SO AS TO PROHIBIT THE PERMANENT ATTACHMENT OF DEALER LICENSE PLATES TO MOTOR VEHICLES AND DEFINE TERMS.

A. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 56-3-2323. Dealer license plates regulated by the Department of Revenue and Taxation through funds appropriated in the general appropriations act must not be attached permanently to motor vehicles. As used in this section, a plate is attached permanently if the attachment includes, but is not limited to, the use of nuts, bolts, or screws."

B. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

Reps. CROMER, HODGES and GAMBLE proposed the following Amendment No. 269 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\9015JM.94), which was adopted.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION
TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 24-13-80 SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS FROM AN INMATE'S ACCOUNT FOR DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY, MEDICAL TREATMENT, AND OTHER CAUSES, AND TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS FOR MEDICAL COSTS.

A. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 24-13-80. (A) As used in this section:

(1) `Detention facility' means a municipal or county jail or state correctional facility used for the detention of persons charged with or convicted of either a felony, a misdemeanor, or a municipal offense.

(2) `Inmate' means a person who is detained in a detention facility by reason of being charged with or convicted of a felony, a misdemeanor, or a municipal offense.

(3) `Medical treatment' means each visit initiated by the inmate to an institutional physician; physician's extender, including a physician's


Printed Page 3298 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

assistant or a nurse practitioner; dentist; optometrist; or psychiatrist for examination or treatment.

(4) `Officer in charge' means the sheriff, if the detention facility is under his supervision, or the warden or superintendent having the supervision of another detention facility.

(B) The officer in charge may establish, by rules, criteria for a reasonable deduction from money credited to the account of an inmate to:

(1) repay the costs of:

(a) public property wilfully damaged or destroyed by the inmate during his incarceration;

(b) medical treatment for injuries inflicted by the inmate upon himself or others;

(c) searching for and apprehending the inmate when he escapes or attempts to escape, the costs to be limited to those extraordinary costs incurred as a consequence of the escape; or

(d) quelling a riot or other disturbance in which the inmate is unlawfully involved.

(2) defray the costs paid by a municipality or county for medical treatment for an inmate, which medical treatment has been requested by the inmate, provided that the deduction from money credited to the account of an inmate does not exceed five dollars for each occurrence of treatment received by the inmate at the inmate's request. If the balance in an inmate's account is five dollars or less, the fee must not be charged.

The provisions of this item do not apply to medical costs incurred as a result of injuries sustained by an inmate or other medically necessary treatment for which that inmate is determined not to be responsible.

(C) All sums collected for medical treatment must be reimbursed to the inmate if the inmate is acquitted or otherwise exonerated of all charges for which the inmate was being held.

(D) The detention facility must initiate an action for collection of recovery of medical costs incurred pursuant to this section against an inmate upon his release or his estate if the inmate was executed or died while in the custody of the detention facility."

B. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. HODGES explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.


Printed Page 3299 . . . . . Thursday, March 10, 1994

Reps. BARBER, J. BAILEY, FULMER, HOLT and BREELAND proposed the following Amendment No. 275 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\CYY\15885AC.94), which was ruled out of order.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part II, by adding an appropriately numbered section to read:

/Section
TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS 4-9-32 AND 5-7-315 SO AS TO AUTHORIZE COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES IN A COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF 295,000 BUT FEWER THAN 320,000 TO IMPOSE A BUSINESS LICENSE TAX ON A NONPROFIT, CHARITABLE, OR ELEEMOSYNARY CORPORATION ON GROSS INCOME DERIVED FROM MEDICAL SERVICES PROVIDED FOR THE CORPORATION BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN LIEU OF A BUSINESS TAX IMPOSED ON THE INDIVIDUAL.

A. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 4-9-32. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4-9-30(12), a business license tax may be imposed by a county with a population of 295,000 but fewer than 320,000 according to the 1990 census on a nonprofit, charitable, or eleemosynary corporation which retains professional services of a person required to be licensed by a state or federal agency, board, or department to provide medical services. If this tax is imposed, it must be imposed on the gross income derived from the services rendered in the county, either directly or indirectly related to services provided by the licensed individual, and it must be in lieu of a county business license tax imposed on the income of the individual rendering the services."

B. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 5-7-315. A business license tax may be imposed by a municipality in a county of 295,000 but fewer than 320,000 according to the 1990 census on a nonprofit, charitable, or eleemosynary corporation which retains professional services of a person required to be licensed by a state or federal agency, board, or department to provide medical services. If this tax is imposed, it must be imposed on the gross income derived from the services rendered in the municipality, either directly or indirectly related to services provided by the licensed individual, and it must be in lieu of the municipal business license tax imposed on the income of the individual rendering the services."

C. This section takes effect July 1, 1994./

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.


| Printed Page 3280, Mar. 10 | Printed Page 3300, Mar. 10 |

Page Finder Index