Journal of the House of Representatives
of the First Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 1680, Mar. 14 | Printed Page 1700, Mar. 14 |

Printed Page 1690 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

The question was put, shall the Act become a part of the law, the veto of his Excellency, the Governor to the contrary notwithstanding, the yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Yeas 5; Nays 0

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Brown, H.        Dantzler         Law
Williams         Wofford

Total--5

Those who voted in the negative are:

Total--0

So, the veto of the Governor was overridden and a message was ordered sent to the Senate accordingly.

THE HOUSE RESUMES

At 2:15 P.M. the House resumed, the SPEAKER in the Chair.

POINT OF QUORUM

The question of a quorum was raised. A quorum was later present.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. HASKINS a leave of absence for the remainder of the day due to medical reasons.

H. 3690--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Joint Resolution was taken up.

H. 3690 -- Ways and Means Committee: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO MAKE SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 SURPLUS GENERAL FUND REVENUES.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. SHEHEEN raised the Point of Order that the $87,879,628 should be stricken from the Bill as Section 11-11-140 (D) prohibited the appropriation from surplus funds, before the first meeting of the General Assembly following the Comptroller General's closing of the books for the fiscal year in which the surplus occurred.


Printed Page 1691 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Rep. HARRELL stated that Section D of 11-11-140 was a subsection of the entire code section regulating how Carnell/Felder money could be spent and that it was referring to the Carnell/Felder set aside money and not to all surplus monies.

The SPEAKER stated that a Point of Order had been raised earlier this year on this same issue during the deliberation of the Supplemental Appropriations Bill on Feb. 1. He further stated that he specifically refused to address this issue in the earlier ruling because he held, on the basis of the effective date of the Act by which Section 11-11-140, or the Carnell/Felder Amendment, became law, that this code section would not apply to that Feb. 1 bill because the money being spent was generated during a fiscal year to which the new law specifically did not apply.

The SPEAKER further stated that in the Feb. 1 ruling on Rep. Sheheen's Point of Order that Rep. Sheheen had specifically asked if the ruling applied to all surplus funds. The Speaker stated that he had responded that he was not ruling on that issue at that time, but he further noted that he had stated that the bottom line was that Subsection D applied only to the surplus created by A, B and C of the statute.

The SPEAKER further stated that the Carnell/Felder Amendment, in effect, created a third reserve fund, and that Section D of 11-11-140 which referred to the term "surplus", applied only to the third reserve fund, created by A, B and C of 11-11-140. Section D contained the restrictions for those Carnell/Felder funds and specifically restricted its appropriation in two ways. First, it prohibits appropriating the funds until the first meeting of the General Assembly following the Comptroller General's closing of the books on the fiscal year in which the surplus occurred. And, second, it restricts appropriation of the Carnell/Felder funds to "nonreccuring purposes".

The SPEAKER further stated that there are now two funds. First, there is the Carnell/Felder fund which was roughly 54 million dollars based on the Board of Economic Advisors estimates for the FY 1995-96 Appropriations Bill. He noted that this fund is clearly created by an application of Subsections A, B and C of 11-11-140. However, he also noted that there was an additional surplus created when it became clear that the Board of Economic Advisors original estimate for revenue to be collected was less than would actually be collected. He further stated that the question was whether Subsection D, which referenced "surplus", was restricted to the Carnell/Felder 54 million dollars or whether it applied to any surplus. He ruled that Subsection D was restricted only to the Carnell/Felder reserve funds and created by the application of A, B and C, which was roughly $54 million and did not apply to any other surplus


Printed Page 1692 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

funds. He further stated that if Subsection D was in a separate statute and applied to any surplus funds, then there might be a broader application, and he overruled the Point of Order.

MOTION ADOPTED

Rep. H. BROWN moved that the Joint Resolution be considered section by section, which was agreed to.

SECTION 1

Section 1 was adopted.

SECTION 2--AMENDED AND ADOPTED

Rep. H. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 13 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DC.151), which was adopted.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 2, Page 1, Item 2, Lines 30-31, by striking /Comptroller General/ and inserting /State Treasurer/

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. H. BROWN explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

Section 2 as amended was adopted.

SECTION 3--AMENDED AND ADOPTED

Rep. H. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5615HTC.95), which was adopted.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, page 2, by inserting after line 27:

A. Surplus fiscal year 1994-95 general fund revenues in excess of $142,470,875 must be credited to the State Property Tax Relief Fund and used in the manner provided by law for revenues in that fund./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. H. BROWN explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

Section 3 as amended was adopted.


Printed Page 1693 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

SECTION 4--ADOPTED

Rep. KIRSH proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\PT\1756DW.95), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Page 2, Lines 29 through 42, by striking SECTION 4 in its entirety.

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. KIRSH explained the amendment.

Rep. FELDER moved to table the amendment.

Rep. KIRSH demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 61 to 27.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN proposed the following Amendment No. 10 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5609HTC.95), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, by striking SECTION 4 and inserting:

/SECTION 4. In addition to the appropriations provided in Section 2 of this joint resolution, there is appropriated from the general fund of the State 2,250,000 dollars each for the University of South Carolina and City of Greenville arena projects and 500,000 dollars for the Spartanburg, Cherokee, and Union Counties Drug Abuse Center, but these appropriations are contingent upon receipt of the 5,000,000 dollars from the Southeast Compact for Low-Level Nuclear Waste pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-48-80(E) of the 1976 Code and the approval of the financial plan assuring the funding for the construction of each of the arenas by the State Budget and Control Board. The State Budget and Control Board review is limited to assurance of the total fund availability for the arena construction. Failure of either of the University of South Carolina or the City of Greenville to present a plan to be approved prior to the adjournment of the General Assembly on the first Thursday in June, 1996, shall result in forfeiture and lapse of these arena appropriations./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN explained the amendment.

Rep. FELDER moved to table the amendment.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 52 to 25.


Printed Page 1694 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Rep. LITTLEJOHN proposed the following Amendment No. 12 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5623HTC.95), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, by striking SECTION 4 and inserting:

/SECTION 4. In addition to the appropriations provided in Section 2 of this joint resolution, there is appropriated from the general fund of the State 2,300,000 dollars each for the University of South Carolina and City of Greenville arena projects and 400,000 dollars for the Spartanburg, Cherokee, and Union Counties Drug Abuse Center, but these appropriations are contingent upon receipt of the 5,000,000 dollars from the Southeast Compact for Low-Level Nuclear Waste pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-48-80(E) of the 1976 Code and the approval of the financial plan assuring the funding for the construction of each of the arenas by the State Budget and Control Board. The State Budget and Control Board review is limited to assurance of the total fund availability for the arena construction. Failure of either of the University of South Carolina or the City of Greenville to present a plan to be approved prior to the adjournment of the General Assembly on the first Thursday in June, 1996, shall result in forfeiture and lapse of these arena appropriations./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 49 to 27.

Rep. STILLE proposed the following Amendment No. 14 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DC.506), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 4, Page 2, Line 25, by amending Section 4 to read /In addition to the appropriations provided in Section 2 of this joint resolution, there is appropriated from the general fund of the state 2,500,000 dollars each for the University of South Carolina and City of Greenville arena projects, but this appropriation is $4,935,000 to the colleges and universities for higher education formula and $65,000 to the Election Commission for automated voting. The appropriation for higher education formula must be distributed based on a CHE approved allocation methodology. The appropriation for automated voting is designated to aid counties presently using paper ballots in purchasing automated count voting systems. The state may reimburse up to seventy percent of the cost of these systems.


Printed Page 1695 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

These appropriations are contingent upon receipt of the 5,000,000 dollars from the Southeast Compact for Low-Level Nuclear Waste pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-48-80(E) of the 1976 Code. and the approval of the financial plan assuring the funding for the construction of each of the arenas by the State Budget and Control Board. The State Budget and Control Board review is limited to assurance of the total fund availability for the construction. Failure of either of the entities to present a plan to be approved prior to the adjournment of the General Assembly on the first Thursday in June, 1996, shall result in forfeiture and lapse of these appropriations.
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.

Rep. STILLE explained the amendment.

Rep. HALLMAN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 47 to 16.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN proposed the following Amendment No. 11 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5624HTC.95), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, by striking SECTION 4 and inserting:

/SECTION 4. In addition to the appropriations provided in Section 2 of this joint resolution, there is appropriated from the general fund of the State 2,350,000 dollars each for the University of South Carolina and City of Greenville arena projects and 300,000 dollars for the Spartanburg, Cherokee, and Union Counties Drug Abuse Center, but these appropriations are contingent upon receipt of the 5,000,000 dollars from the Southeast Compact for Low-Level Nuclear Waste pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-48-80(E) of the 1976 Code and the approval of the financial plan assuring the funding for the construction of each of the arenas by the State Budget and Control Board. The State Budget and Control Board review is limited to assurance of the total fund availability for the arena construction. Failure of either of the University of South Carolina or the City of Greenville to present a plan to be approved prior to the adjournment of the General Assembly on the first Thursday in June, 1996, shall result in forfeiture and lapse of these arena appropriations./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. LITTLEJOHN explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. FLEMING demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 37 to 26.


Printed Page 1696 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Rep. STUART proposed the following Amendment No. 16, which was tabled.

Amend Section 4, by striking 4 and inserting the following figures:

5,000,000 EIA CREDITS HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. STUART explained the amendment.

Rep. McELVEEN spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. FELDER moved to table the amendment.

Rep. KENNEDY demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 63; Nays 41

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison          Bailey           Boan
Brown, H.        Byrd             Cain
Carnell          Cato             Chamblee
Cobb-Hunter      Cotty            Dantzler
Davenport        Easterday        Fair
Felder           Fulmer           Gamble
Hallman          Harrell          Harris, P.
Harrison         Harwell          Herdklotz
Howard           Huff             Inabinett
Jaskwhich        Keegan           Klauber
Knotts           Koon             Law
Limbaugh         Limehouse        Littlejohn
Lloyd            Marchbanks       Mason
McAbee           Neal             Phillips
Quinn            Rice             Riser
Robinson         Rogers           Sandifer
Scott            Seithel          Sharpe
Shissias         Smith, R.        Tripp
Trotter          Vaughn           Waldrop
Wells            Wilkes           Wilkins
Wofford          Wright           Young, A.

Total--63



Printed Page 1697 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson         Askins           Baxley
Breeland         Brown, T.        Canty
Cave             Cromer           Fleming
Harris, J.       Hines            Hutson
Jennings         Kelley           Kennedy
Keyserling       Kinon            Kirsh
Martin           McCraw           McElveen
McMahand         McTeer           Meacham
Moody-Lawrence   Neilson          Rhoad
Richardson       Sheheen          Simrill
Spearman         Stille           Stuart
Thomas           Whatley          Whipper, L.
Whipper, S.      Wilder           Williams
Witherspoon      Young, J.

Total--41

So, the amendment was tabled.

Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 17 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DC.510), which was tabled.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 4, Page 2, Line 29, by amending Section 4 to read /In addition to the appropriations provided in Section 2 of this joint resolution, there is appropriated from the general fund of the state 2,500,000 dollars each for the University of South Carolina and City of Greenville arena projects, but $5,000,000 for the Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund in the Budget and Control Board Office of Local Government. The funds are to be used only as loans for water and sewer infrastructure projects. The appropriation is contingent upon receipt of the 5,000,000 dollars from the Southeast Compact for Low-Level Nuclear Waste pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-48-80(E) of the 1976 Code. and the approval of the financial plan assuring the funding for the construction of each of the arenas by the State Budget and Control Board. The State Budget and Control Board review is limited to assurance of the total fund availability for the construction. Failure of either of the entities to present a plan to be approved prior to the adjournment of the General Assembly on the first Thursday in June 1996, shall result in forfeiture and lapse of these appropriations. No project funded herein shall exceed the sum of $500,000.

Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.


Printed Page 1698 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.

Rep. HALLMAN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. CAVE demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 56; Nays 45

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison          Boan             Brown, G.
Brown, H.        Byrd             Cain
Cato             Chamblee         Cotty
Dantzler         Davenport        Easterday
Felder           Fulmer           Gamble
Hallman          Harrell          Harris, J.
Harris, P.       Harrison         Herdklotz
Huff             Jennings         Keegan
Kelley           Klauber          Knotts
Koon             Lanford          Law
Limbaugh         Limehouse        Littlejohn
Marchbanks       McCraw           Phillips
Quinn            Rice             Riser
Rogers           Sandifer         Sharpe
Sheheen          Smith, D.        Smith, R.
Stoddard         Tripp            Trotter
Walker           Wells            Wilkins
Witherspoon      Wofford          Wright
Young, A.        Young, J.

Total--56

Those who voted in the negative are:

Anderson         Bailey           Beatty
Breeland         Brown, T.        Canty
Carnell          Cave             Fair
Fleming          Govan            Hines
Howard           Inabinett        Kennedy
Keyserling       Kirsh            Lloyd
McAbee           McElveen         McMahand
McTeer           Meacham          Moody-Lawrence
Neal             Neilson          Rhoad
Richardson       Robinson         Scott


Printed Page 1699 . . . . . Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Simrill          Spearman         Stille
Stuart           Thomas           Tucker
Vaughn           Waldrop          Whatley
Whipper, L.      Whipper, S.      White
Wilder           Williams         Worley

Total--45

So, the amendment was tabled.

Rep. HUTSON moved to adjourn debate upon the section.

Rep. HALLMAN moved to table the motion, which was agreed to.

Section 4 was adopted.

SECTION 5

Section 5 was adopted.

Rep. H. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5606HTC.95), which was ruled out of order.

Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:

/SECTION ___. The July 1, 1995, deadline imposed pursuant to Section 12-21-2776(B) of the 1976 Code for metering devices on video games with a free play feature licensed pursuant to Section 12-21-2720(A)(3) is postponed until July 1, 1996./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. H. BROWN explained the amendment.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. KIRSH raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 3 was out of order as it was not germane in that it did not relate to the Supplemental Appropriations Bill. He further stated that it did not have anything to do with money and that it dealt with rules.

Rep. H. BROWN argued contra the Point in stating that it had $8 million in it.

Rep. SHEHEEN stated that Section 1 had $8 million but that it did not state that it was related to video poker.


| Printed Page 1680, Mar. 14 | Printed Page 1700, Mar. 14 |

Page Finder Index