Printed Page 2720, Apr. 26
| Printed Page 2740, Apr. 26
|
Printed Page 2720, Apr. 26
| Printed Page 2740, Apr. 26
| Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 7 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10118JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three five hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and compensated therefor under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10 loss of earnings capacity, in which event the injured employee shall be paid the difference in wages until such loss ceases or for life, and if loss is greater than fifty percent, payments shall continue for life."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three five hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence. When determining disability the employee's age, education, past employment, and abilities must be considered."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. BAXLEY explained the amendment.
Rep. CATO moved to table the amendment.
Rep. BAXLEY demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Askins Bailey Brown, H. Cain Carnell Cato Chamblee Cotty Dantzler Davenport Easterday Elliott Fair Fulmer Gamble Hallman Harrell Herdklotz Keegan Kelley Kirsh Knotts Koon Law Limehouse Marchbanks Mason McCraw Moody-Lawrence Phillips Quinn Rhoad Rice Richardson Riser Robinson Sandifer Scott
Seithel Sharpe Sheheen Shissias Simrill Smith, R. Spearman Stille Stuart Townsend Trotter Vaughn Waldrop Walker Whatley Wilder Wilkins Witherspoon Wofford Worley Wright Young, A.
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Baxley Breeland Cave Clyburn Cromer Delleney Govan Harris, J. Harrison Harvin Howard Jennings Keyserling Kinon Lloyd Martin McMahand Rogers Thomas Tucker Whipper, L. Whipper, S. White Young, J.
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 9 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10116JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three nine hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 10 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10115JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. MARTIN explained the amendment.
Rep. A. YOUNG moved to table the amendment.
Rep. CATO demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Askins Bailey Brown, H. Cain Carnell Cato Chamblee Cooper Cotty Dantzler Davenport Easterday Fair Fleming Fulmer Gamble Hallman Harrell Herdklotz Keegan Kelley Keyserling Kirsh Knotts Koon Lanford
Law Limbaugh Limehouse Littlejohn Marchbanks Mason McCraw Meacham Neilson Phillips Quinn Rhoad Rice Richardson Riser Robinson Sandifer Seithel Sharpe Sheheen Shissias Simrill Smith, R. Spearman Stille Stuart Townsend Vaughn Waldrop Walker Whatley Wilder Witherspoon Wofford Wright Young, A.
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Baxley Breeland Brown, G. Byrd Cave Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cromer Delleney Govan Harris, J. Harrison Harvin Hines Jennings Kinon Lloyd Martin McMahand Moody-Lawrence Rogers Scott Thomas Tucker Whipper, L. Whipper, S. Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 11 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10119JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three five hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 12 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10120JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three six hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 13 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10121JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three seven hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 14 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10122JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three seven hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 15 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10123JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three eight hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 16 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10124JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three eight hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 17 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3893JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three four hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back,
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 18 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3896JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three six hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 19 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3895JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three five hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 20 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\DKA\3894JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three four hundred fifty weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall must be such those proportions of the periods of payment herein provided in this paragraph for total loss as such the partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed is presumed to have suffered total and permanent disability and must be compensated therefor for this under paragraph two of Section 42-9-10. The presumption of total and permanent disability due to a fifty percent or more loss of use of the back may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence."/
Amend title to conform.
Rep. THOMAS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. THOMAS proposed the following Amendment No. 21 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BBM\10127JM.95), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, by striking Section 42-9-30(19), as contained in SECTION 1 at lines 26 through 37, and inserting:
/"(19) For the total loss of use of the back, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the average weekly wages during three hundred weeks. The compensation for partial loss of use of the back shall be such proportions of the periods of payment herein provided for total loss as such partial loss bears to total loss, except that in cases where there is fifty percent or more loss of use of the back, in which event the injured employee shall be deemed to have suffered total and permanent disability and compensated
Printed Page 2720, Apr. 26
| Printed Page 2740, Apr. 26
|