Journal of the House of Representatives
of the First Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 4202, May 30 | Printed Page 4220, May 30 |

Printed Page 4210 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill, as amended, on second reading.

Pursuant to Rule 7.7 the yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 75; Nays 22

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Askins           Baxley           Boan
Breeland         Brown, J.        Cain
Cato             Chamblee         Clyburn
Cotty            Dantzler         Davenport
Delleney         Easterday        Fair
Fulmer           Gamble           Hallman
Harris, J.       Haskins          Herdklotz
Hines            Howard           Hutson
Jaskwhich        Jennings         Keegan
Kelley           Kennedy          Knotts
Koon             Lanford          Law
Limbaugh         Limehouse        Littlejohn
Lloyd            Marchbanks       Martin
Mason            McKay            McMahand
McTeer           Meacham          Neal
Neilson          Quinn            Rice
Richardson       Riser            Sandifer
Scott            Seithel          Shissias
Simrill          Smith, D.        Smith, R.
Stoddard         Stuart           Tripp
Trotter          Waldrop          Walker
Wells            Whatley          Whipper, L.
Whipper, S.      White            Wilder
Wilkins          Witherspoon      Wofford
Worley           Wright           Young, A.

Total--75

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison          Byrd             Carnell
Cobb-Hunter      Harris, P.       Keyserling
Kirsh            Klauber          McAbee
McCraw           Phillips         Rhoad
Rogers           Sheheen          Spearman


Printed Page 4211 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

Stille           Thomas           Townsend
Tucker           Vaughn           Wilkes
Young, J.

Total--22

So, the Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.

RECORD FOR JOURNAL

I elected not to vote on S. 463 because my family is in the funeral business. While I do not have an economic interest which could possibly cause a conflict of interest, I felt it was best to refrain from voting on S. 463.

Rep. ALFRED B. ROBINSON, JR.

H. 3202--RECOMMITTED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3202 -- Rep. Scott: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 12-37-220, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS, SO AS TO EXTEND THE EXEMPTION ALLOWED THE PROPERTY OF A RELIGIOUS, CHARITABLE, ELEEMOSYNARY, EDUCATION, OR LITERARY SOCIETY TO PROPERTY LEASED BY SUCH ORGANIZATIONS.

Rep. ROBINSON moved to recommit the Bill to the Committee on Ways and Means, which was agreed to by a division vote of 55 to 11.

H. 3174--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. P. HARRIS moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill until Wednesday, May 31, which was adopted.

H. 3174 -- Reps. P. Harris and Richardson: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 56-1-50, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO A BEGINNER'S DRIVING PERMIT, SO AS TO INCREASE ITS FEE AND PLACE A PORTION OF THE FEE IN THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION TRUST FUND; TO AMEND SECTION 56-1-140, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF A DRIVER'S LICENSE, ITS FEE, AND CONTENTS, SO AS TO INCREASE THE DRIVER'S LICENSE FEE AND PLACE A PORTION OF THE FEE IN THE MOTORCYCLE


Printed Page 4212 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

SAFETY EDUCATION TRUST FUND; TO AMEND SECTION 56-3-760, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO REGISTRATION FEE FOR MOTORCYCLES AND MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLES, SO AS TO INCREASE THE FEE AND PLACE A PORTION OF THE FEE IN THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION TRUST FUND; TO AMEND SECTION 59-53-2010, RELATING TO A STATEWIDE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY INSTRUCTION PROGRAM, SO AS TO REVISE DEFINITIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 59-53-2020, RELATING TO THE CREATION, ADMINISTRATION, INSTRUCTORS, AND CURRICULUM ASSOCIATED WITH THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY INSTRUCTION PROGRAM, SO AS TO ELIMINATE THE "MOTORCYCLE SAFETY INSTRUCTION PROGRAM", TO CREATE THE "MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM", TO ESTABLISH THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM'S ADMINISTRATION'S PURPOSE, COURSE ENROLLMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTRUCTOR REQUIREMENTS, AND CURRICULUM; BY ADDING SECTION 59-53-2022 SO AS TO REQUIRE THE STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION DEVELOP CERTAIN WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; BY ADDING SECTION 59-53-2024 SO AS TO CREATE, ESTABLISH REVENUE SOURCES FOR, AND PROVIDE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION TRUST FUND; BY ADDING SECTION 59-53-2026 SO AS TO ESTABLISH AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING, ESTABLISHING, AND MAINTAINING THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM; BY ADDING SECTION 59-53-2028 SO AS TO REQUIRE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION TO ISSUE A BIANNUAL REPORT REGARDING THE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM; AND TO REPEAL SECTION 59-53-2030 RELATING TO PROGRAM ENROLLMENT FEES.

SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE IN CHAIR

H. 3962--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Joint Resolution was taken up.

H. 3962 -- Reps. Wilkins, Harrison, D. Smith, Huff, Wells, Witherspoon, H. Brown, Sharpe, Meacham, Fulmer, Fleming, Mason, Wright, A. Young, Keegan, Cain, Tripp, Rice, Riser, Herdklotz, Seithel,


Printed Page 4213 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

Kelley, Trotter, Haskins, Simrill, Hutson, Wofford, Marchbanks, Cotty, Fair, R. Smith, Harrell, Stuart, Klauber, Walker and Sandifer: A JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3, ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO THE SUPREME COURT; SECTION 8, ARTICLE V, RELATING TO THE COURT OF APPEALS; SECTION 13, ARTICLE V, RELATING TO THE JUDICIAL CIRCUITS AND THE COURTS THEREOF; SECTION 17, ARTICLE V, RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OR RETIREMENT OF JUDGES OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM; AND SECTION 18, ARTICLE V, RELATING TO VACANCIES IN THE SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE CIRCUIT COURT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT JUDGES OF THESE COURTS MUST BE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR FROM A LIST OF NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL MERIT SELECTION COMMISSION; AND TO AMEND ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE RELATING TO THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT BY ADDING SECTION 27 SO AS TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL MERIT SELECTION COMMISSION TO NOMINATE CANDIDATES FOR THE ABOVE JUDICIAL OFFICES AND FOR JUDGES OF OTHER COURTS OF UNIFORM JURISDICTION AS THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY PROVIDE BY LAW.

Amend Title To Conform

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 15, Article V of the Constitution of South Carolina, 1895, is amended to read:

"Section 15. No person shall be eligible to the office of Chief Justice, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, judge of the Court of Appeals, or judge of the Circuit Court who is not at the time of his election a citizen of the United States and of this State, and has not attained the age of twenty-six thirty-two years, has not been a licensed attorney at law for at least five ten years, and has not been a resident of this State for five years next preceding his election.

Any justice or judge serving in office on the effective date of the provisions of this section requiring a justice or judge to be thirty-two years of age and to have ten years of service as a licensed attorney at law who is not of that age or who has not been licensed for this required period of time may continue to serve for the remainder of his current term and is considered to have the requisite age and years of service as a licensed attorney for purposes of future reelections to that judicial office."


Printed Page 4214 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

"Must Section 15 of Article V of the Constitution of this State relating to qualifications for justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Court of Appeals and the Circuit Court be amended so as to increase from twenty-six to thirty-two the age requirement for election to these offices, to increase from five to ten the number of years which a person must have been a licensed attorney at law in order to be eligible for election to these offices, and to provide that any justice or judge serving in office on the effective date of the provisions of this section requiring a justice or judge to be thirty-two years of age and to have ten years of service as a licensed attorney at law who is not of that age or who has not been licensed for this required period of time may continue to serve for the remainder of his current term and is considered to have the requisite age and years of service as a licensed attorney at law for purposes of future reelections to that judicial office?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."

SECTION 3. It is proposed that Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding:

"Section 27. In addition to the qualifications for Circuit Court and Court of Appeals judges and Supreme Court justices contained in this article, the General Assembly by law shall establish a Judicial Merit Selection Commission to consider the qualifications and fitness of candidates for all judicial positions on these courts and on other courts of this State which are filled by election of the General Assembly. The General Assembly must elect the judges and justices from among the nominees of the commission to fill a vacancy on these courts.

No person may be elected to these judicial positions unless he or she has been found qualified by the commission. Before a sitting member of the General Assembly may submit an application with the commission for his nomination to a judicial office, and before the commission may accept


Printed Page 4215 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

or consider such an application, the member of the General Assembly must first resign his office."

SECTION 4. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

"Must Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding Section 27 so as to provide that the General Assembly by law shall establish a judicial merit selection commission to nominate candidates for election to judicial positions on the courts of this State which are filled by election of the General Assembly, to provide that the General Assembly must elect judges and justices for these courts from among these nominees, to provide that no person may be elected to these judicial positions unless he or she has been found qualified by the commission, and to provide that before a sitting member of the General Assembly may submit an application with the commission for his nomination to a judicial office, and before the commission may accept or consider such an application, the member of the General Assembly must first resign his office?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."

Reps. WILKINS, HODGES, HARRISON and D. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\GJK\22044SD.95), which was adopted.

Amend the Resolution, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 15, Article V of the Constitution of South Carolina, 1895, is amended to read:

"Section 15. No person shall be eligible to the office of Chief Justice, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, judge of the Court of Appeals, or judge of the Circuit Court who is not at the time of his election a citizen of the United States and of this State, and has not attained the age of twenty-six thirty-two years, has not been a licensed attorney at law for at least five ten years, and has not been a resident of this State for five years next preceding his election.


Printed Page 4216 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

Any justice or judge serving in office on the effective date of the provisions of this section requiring a justice or judge to be thirty-two years of age and to have ten years of service as a licensed attorney at law who is not of that age or who has not been licensed for this required period of time may continue to serve for the remainder of his current term and is considered to have the requisite age and years of service as a licensed attorney for purposes of future reelections to that judicial office."

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

"Must Section 15 of Article V of the Constitution of this State relating to qualifications for justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Court of Appeals and the Circuit Court be amended so as to increase from twenty-six to thirty-two the age requirement for election to these offices, to increase from five to ten the number of years which a person must have been a licensed attorney at law in order to be eligible for election to these offices, and to provide that any justice or judge serving in office on the effective date of the provisions of this section requiring a justice or judge to be thirty-two years of age and to have ten years of service as a licensed attorney at law who is not of that age or who has not been licensed for this required period of time may continue to serve for the remainder of his current term and is considered to have the requisite age and years of service as a licensed attorney at law for purposes of future reelections to that judicial office?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."

SECTION 3. It is proposed that Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding:

"Section 27. In addition to the qualifications for Circuit Court and Court of Appeals judges and Supreme Court justices contained in this article, the General Assembly by law shall establish a Judicial Merit Selection Commission to consider the qualifications and fitness of candidates for all judicial positions on these courts and on other courts of this State which are filled by election of the General Assembly. The General Assembly must elect the judges and justices from among the nominees of the commission to fill a vacancy on these courts.


Printed Page 4217 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

No person may be elected to these judicial positions unless he or she has been found qualified by the commission. Before a sitting member of the General Assembly may submit an application with the commission for his nomination to a judicial office, and before the commission may accept or consider such an application, the member of the General Assembly must first resign his office."

SECTION 4. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

"Must Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding Section 27 so as to provide that the General Assembly by law shall establish a judicial merit selection commission to nominate candidates for election to judicial positions on the courts of this State which are filled by election of the General Assembly, to provide that the General Assembly must elect judges and justices for these courts from among these nominees, to provide that no person may be elected to these judicial positions unless he or she has been found qualified by the commission, and to provide that before a sitting member of the General Assembly may submit an application with the commission for his nomination to a judicial office, and before the commission may accept or consider such an application, the member of the General Assembly must first resign his office?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. WILKINS explained the amendment.

Rep. WILKINS spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. HARRISON spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. HODGES spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. HODGES spoke in favor of the amendment.

SPEAKER IN CHAIR



Printed Page 4218 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

Rep. HODGES continued speaking.

The amendment was then adopted.

Rep. SCOTT proposed the following Amendment No. 4, which was rejected.

Amend Section 15, Article V of the S.C. Constitution, striking the age requirement of 32-years old, so that the age would remain at 26-years (current law).

Rep. SCOTT explained the amendment.

The amendment was then rejected.

Rep. SCOTT proposed the following Amendment No. 5, which was tabled.

Strike the three persons appointed by the Governor.

Rep. SCOTT explained the amendment.

Rep. HARRISON moved to table the amendment.

Rep. SCOTT demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 62 to 13.

Reps. SHEHEEN, BAXLEY and DELLENEY proposed the following Amendment No. 6, which was tabled.

AMEND THE BILL, AS AND IF AMENDED, SECTION 3 BY STRIKING THE SECOND PARAGRAPH ON PAGE 4 AND SUBSTITUTING THE FOLLOWING:

NO PERSON MAY BE ELECTED TO THESE JUDICIAL POSITIONS UNLESS HE OR SHE HAS BEEN FOUND QUALIFIED BY THE COMMISSION. IF A SITTING MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS NOMINATED, HE OR SHE MUST RESIGN THAT SEAT IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE NOMINATION, UNLESS HE OR SHE REJECTS THE NOMINATION AND WITHDRAWS HIS OR HER CANDIDACY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE NOMINATION.

SECTION 4 IS AMENDED TO REFLECT THE QUESTION AS AMENDED SECTION 3 AND SHOULD BE STRICKEN AND PHRASED AS FOLLOWS:

"MUST ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE BE AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 27 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BY LAW SHALL ESTABLISH A JUDICIAL MERIT SELECTION COMMISSION TO NOMINATE


Printed Page 4219 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION TO JUDICIAL POSITIONS ON THE COURTS OF THIS STATE WHICH ARE FILLED BY ELECTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, TO PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MUST ELECT JUDGES AND JUSTICES FOR THESE COURTS FROM AMONG THESE NOMINEES, TO PROVIDE THAT NO PERSON MAY BE ELECTED TO THESE JUDICIAL POSITIONS UNLESS HE OR SHE HAS BEEN FOUND QUALIFIED BY THE COMMISSION, AND TO PROVIDE WHEN A SITTING MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY SOLICIT VOTES AS A NOMINEE, THAT MEMBER MUST RESIGN WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOMINATION OR WITHDRAW FROM THE RACE.

Rep. SHEHEEN explained the amendment.

Rep. HODGES spoke against the amendment.

Rep. BAXLEY spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. SHEHEEN spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. SIMRILL moved to table the amendment.

Rep. SHEHEEN demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 60; Nays 49

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Boan             Brown, H.        Cain
Cato             Chamblee         Cooper
Cotty            Cromer           Dantzler
Davenport        Easterday        Fair
Fulmer           Gamble           Hallman
Harrell          Harvin           Herdklotz
Hodges           Hutson           Jaskwhich
Keegan           Kelley           Keyserling
Klauber          Koon             Lanford
Law              Limehouse        Littlejohn
Marchbanks       Mason            McElveen
McTeer           Meacham          Neilson
Rhoad            Rice             Richardson
Riser            Rogers           Sandifer
Seithel          Sharpe           Shissias
Simrill          Smith, R.        Spearman
Tripp            Trotter          Vaughn
Walker           Wells            Whatley


Printed Page 4220 . . . . . Tuesday, May 30, 1995

Wilkins          Witherspoon      Wofford
Worley           Wright           Young, A.

Total--60

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison          Anderson         Askins
Bailey           Baxley           Breeland
Brown, J.        Brown, T.        Byrd
Carnell          Clyburn          Cobb-Hunter
Delleney         Fleming          Govan
Harris, J.       Harrison         Haskins
Hines            Howard           Inabinett
Jennings         Kennedy          Kirsh
Knotts           Limbaugh         Lloyd
Martin           McAbee           McCraw
McMahand         Moody-Lawrence   Neal
Phillips         Quinn            Robinson
Scott            Sheheen          Smith, D.
Stille           Stoddard         Stuart
Thomas           Tucker           Whipper, L.
Whipper, S.      White            Wilder
Wilkes

Total--49

So, the amendment was tabled.


| Printed Page 4202, May 30 | Printed Page 4220, May 30 |

Page Finder Index