South Carolina General Assembly
114th Session, 2001-2002

Scroll to History Page
Scroll to Previous Versions Links List
Scroll to Full Text
Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Bill 4255


Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter


                    Current Status

Bill Number:                      4255
Type of Legislation:              Concurrent Resolution CR
Introducing Body:                 House
Introduced Date:                  20010605
Primary Sponsor:                  Quinn
All Sponsors:                     Quinn
Drafted Document Number:          l:\council\bills\gjk\20737sd01.doc
Residing Body:                    House
Current Committee:                Invitations and Memorial Resolutions 
                                  Committee 24 HIMR
Subject:                          Littlejohn, et al. V. State of S.C.; 
                                  sales tax increase exemption for aging; Budget 
                                  and Control Board requests to settle


                        History

Body    Date      Action Description                     Com     Leg Involved
______  ________  ______________________________________ _______ ____________
House   20010605  Introduced, referred to Committee      24 HIMR


              Versions of This Bill

View additional legislative information at the LPITS web site.


(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

TO REQUEST THE STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD TO CONSIDER SETTLING THE CASE OF C. BRUCE LITTLEJOHN, ET AL. V. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CASE NUMBER 00-CP-40-2666, UNDER CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

Whereas, the State of South Carolina in 1984 when enacting a one percent increase in the sales tax to fund the Education Improvement Act exempted persons eighty-five years of age and older from this tax; and

Whereas, it appears that during the time since this one percent additional sales tax was imposed, some taxpayers of this age have still paid this tax; and

Whereas, the sales tax is a vendor-based tax where retailers with sales tax numbers collect the tax and remit it to the state Department of Revenue; and

Whereas, in the case of C. Bruce Littlejohn, et al. v. State of South Carolina, Case Number 00-CP-40-2666, a legal action has been brought to seek a refund of these taxes improperly paid; and

Whereas, the State Budget and Control Board has been considering a settlement of this action, but to date a settlement has not been finally approved; and

Whereas, the members of the General Assembly believe that the board, based on information provided by the Department of Revenue, should refund on a pro rata basis the sales taxes improperly paid by all taxpayers in this category; and

Whereas, the General Assembly further believes that appropriate legal fees should be paid to the plaintiff's attorneys handling this matter on an hourly basis at their customary and standard rates after appropriate documentation and timesheets have been submitted to the board. Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the members of the General Assembly, by this resolution, request the State Budget and Control Board to consider settling the case of C. Bruce Littlejohn, et al. v. State of South Carolina, Case Number 00-CP-40-2666, under the terms and conditions specified in this resolution.

Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the State Budget and Control Board.

----XX----


This web page was last updated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 at 11:33 A.M.