South Carolina General Assembly
115th Session, 2003-2004

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

H. 5133

STATUS INFORMATION

Concurrent Resolution
Sponsors: Reps. Limehouse, Allen, Altman, Bailey, Battle, Breeland, R. Brown, Ceips, Clark, Clyburn, Dantzler, Delleney, Duncan, Emory, Freeman, Frye, Gourdine, Hagood, Hamilton, Harrell, Harrison, Hayes, Herbkersman, J. Hines, Hosey, Koon, Lee, Lloyd, Lucas, Mahaffey, Merrill, Miller, Moody-Lawrence, J.M. Neal, Neilson, Owens, M.A. Pitts, Rice, Richardson, Simrill, Sinclair, Skelton, D.C. Smith, G.R. Smith, J.R. Smith, Snow, Taylor, Thompson, Toole, Umphlett, Vaughn, Walker and Whitmire
Document Path: l:\council\bills\bbm\10137sj04.doc

Introduced in the House on April 14, 2004
Introduced in the Senate on April 14, 2004
Adopted by the General Assembly on April 15, 2004

Summary: Pledge of Allegiance

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS 

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   4/14/2004  House   Introduced, adopted, sent to Senate HJ-119
   4/14/2004  Senate  Introduced SJ-12
   4/14/2004  Senate  Referred to Committee on General SJ-12
   4/15/2004  Senate  Recalled from Committee on General SJ-2
   4/15/2004  Senate  Adopted, returned to House with concurrence SJ-2

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

4/14/2004

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

TO EXPRESS THE DESIRE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TO KEEP THE PHRASE "UNDER GOD " IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

Whereas, in the landmark case of Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, the United States Supreme Court will determine whether the use of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools violates the Constitution's ban on government-established religion; and

Whereas, the court will examine whether a public school district policy that requires teachers to lead willing students in the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional governmental endorsement of religion with the phrase "under God" as part of the Pledge of Allegiance; and

Whereas, the phrase "under God" was not a part of the original pledge written in 1892, but was added by a 1954 law adopted to distinguish America's religious values and heritage from the atheistic values of communism; and

Whereas, Michael Newdow, an atheist from California, brought the case against the school district that his nine-year-old daughter attends, and Solicitor General Theodore Olson will defend the phrase "under God"; and

Whereas, the members of the South Carolina General Assembly strongly support the use of the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance because the beliefs and the morals of the citizens of South Carolina are reflected in the recitation of the familiar phrase. Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the House of Representative, the Senate concurring:

That the members of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, express their desire to keep the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Monday, December 7, 2009 at 10:41 A.M.