Scroll to History Page
Scroll to Previous Versions Links List
Scroll to Full Text
Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Current Status Bill Number:View additional legislative information at the LPITS web site.
3755Type of Legislation: General Bill GBIntroducing Body: HouseIntroduced Date: 20010320Primary Sponsor: WilkinsAll Sponsors: Wilkins, Harrell, Quinn, W.D. Smith, Campsen, Simrill, McLeodDrafted Document Number: l:\council\bills\bbm\10111htc01.docResiding Body: SenateCurrent Committee: Finance Committee 06 SFDate of Last Amendment: 20010425Subject: Appropriations Act, State, General, Agencies; Legislative Council, Code of Laws, Zero-base budget process, Sunset ReviewHistory Body Date Action Description Com Leg Involved ______ ________ ______________________________________ _______ ____________ Senate 20010501 Introduced, read first time, 06 SF referred to Committee House 20010426 Read third time, sent to Senate ------ 20010426 Scrivener's error corrected House 20010425 Amended, read second time House 20010425 Co-Sponsor added (Rule 5.2) by Rep. McLeod House 20010424 Co-Sponsor added (Rule 5.2) by Rep. Simrill House 20010419 Committee report: Favorable with 30 HWM amendment House 20010410 Co-Sponsor added (Rule 5.2) by Rep. Campsen House 20010320 Introduced, read first time, 30 HWM referred to Committee Versions of This Bill Revised on April 19, 2001 - Word format Revised on April 25, 2001 - Word format Revised on April 26, 2001 - Word format
April 25, 2001
Introduced by Reps. Wilkins, Harrell, Quinn, W.D. Smith, Campsen, Simrill and McLeod
S. Printed 4/25/01--H. [SEC 4/26/01 5:46 PM]
Read the first time March 20, 2001.
TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTIONS 2-7-130, 2-15-140, AND 11-11-75 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A PROVISION ADDING TO, AMENDING, OR REPEALING A PART OF THE GENERAL AND PERMANENT LAW OF THE STATE MUST NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL OR ANY BILL OR JOINT RESOLUTION MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS, TO CREATE A DIVISION WITHIN THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COUNCIL TO CONDUCT EVALUATIONS OF PROGRAMS OF STATE AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS TO DETERMINE IF THESE PROGRAMS HAVE OUTLIVED THEIR USEFULNESS OR SHOULD BE CHANGED TO ADDRESS THE PRIORITIES AND NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS THEY AFFECT, PROVIDE FOR A PROCEDURE FOR THE INITIATION OF A REVIEW, AND PROVIDE FOR ITS FINDINGS AFTER A REVIEW HAS BEEN COMPLETED, AND TO REQUIRE THE GOVERNOR IN THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL RECOMMENDED STATE BUDGET TO APPLY "ZERO-BASE" BUDGETING PRINCIPLES AND TO REQUIRE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE AND THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL AND BILLS OR JOINT RESOLUTIONS MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS TO APPLY "ZERO-BASE" BUDGETING PRINCIPLES.
Amend Title To Conform
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Article 1, Chapter 7, Title 2 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:
Section 2-7-130. There must not be included in the Governor's recommended budget or in the annual general appropriations bill or in any bill or joint resolution making supplemental appropriations a provision:
(1) adding to the general and permanent law of the State;
(2) amending the general and permanent law of the State, not including amendments applying only for the duration of the fiscal year or for the life of the affected appropriation;
(3) repealing any part of the general and permanent law of the State.
The prohibition imposed by this section does not apply to a provision imposing, amending, or repealing a tax.
SECTION 2. Title 2, Chapter 15 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:
"Section 2-15-140. (A) As used in this section:
(1) 'Agency' means a state agency, board, committee, commission, institution, or other subdivision of state government.
(2) 'Committee' means the committee established pursuant to subsection (B) of this section.
(3) 'Council' means the Legislative Audit Council.
(4) 'Evaluation' means the audit and review conducted by the Legislative Audit Council pursuant to Section 2-15-140(C).
(5) 'Zero-base budget' means an agency budget prepared applying the principles established pursuant to subsection (D) of this section.
(6) 'Zero-Base Budget Review' means the review of an agency's zero-base budget request using the methodology established pursuant to subsection (D) of this section.
(B)(1) There is established the Joint Zero-Base Budget and Agency Evaluation Selection Committee consisting of ten members of the General Assembly as follows:
(a) three members of the House Ways and Means Committee, appointed by that committee's chairman;
(b) three members of the Senate Finance Committee, appointed by that committee's chairman;
(c) two members of the House of Representatives who do not serve on the Ways and Means Committee, appointed by the Speaker of the House; and
(d) two members of the Senate who do not serve on the Finance Committee, appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
Members serve ex officio and shall serve for terms coterminous with their legislative terms. Vacancies must be filled in the manner of original appointments. The committee shall elect a chairman, who shall serve for the duration of a General Assembly. The chairmanship for each General Assembly must alternate between a house member and a senator.
(2) The committee annually shall select state agencies for evaluation and zero-base budgeting during times the committee establishes. An agency budget submitted while an agency is undergoing evaluation must be prepared in the form of a zero-base budget and reviewed accordingly by the Governor and the Office of State Budget and the House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee. The council may assess an agency selected for evaluation and zero-base budgeting an audit fee not to exceed one-half of one percent of the agency's budget which must be transferred to approved accounts of the council.
(C)(1) There is created within the Legislative Audit Council a government review division whose purpose is to conduct evaluations of programs of state agencies and departments to determine whether these programs have outlived their usefulness or should be changed to address the priorities and needs of the state's citizens and the General Assembly.
(2) In conducting these evaluations, the review division shall consider the mission of the agency, as defined by the General Assembly, and how the programs fulfill that mission. The review division may consider, but is not limited to, evaluation of the following matters:
(a) the economic, fiscal, and other impacts that would occur in the absence of the administering of the programs or functions of the agency under review;
(b) the overall cost, including manpower, of the agency under review;
(c) the efficiency of the administration of the programs or functions of the agency under review, including the management process and structure;
(d) the extent to which the programs under review have encouraged the participation of the public and have provided service to the state's citizens;
(e) the extent to which the programs duplicate the services, functions, and programs administered by any other state, federal, or other agency or entity;
(f) the extent to which the programs under review have complied with all applicable state, federal, and local statutes, and regulations;
(g) an identification of the objectives intended for the programs, including a review of the agency's annual accountability report, and the problems or needs that the programs were intended to address, the extent to which the objectives have been achieved, and any activities of the programs in addition to those granted by statute and the authority for these activities;
(3) After making its review and evaluation, the division shall hold a public hearing receiving testimony from the public, the executive administration and other personnel of the program of the agency under review and any other interested parties. The division shall consider the fiscal and economic impact of the program and any other relevant issues. In the hearing, the agency providing the program has the burden of demonstrating a public need for the program's continued existence. The standing committee chairmen, as designated in item (4) of this subsection, shall sit in conjunction with the division at these hearings. Pursuant to any other research or inquiries it deems appropriate, the division shall report its findings and conclusions to the presiding officers of the Senate and the House. The presiding officers shall refer the report to the standing committees most concerned with the program of the agency.
(4) Upon selection of an agency for evaluation, the division, and those chairmen of the standing committees that have jurisdiction over particular agencies whose programs are under review, as designated by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House, shall meet and develop a criteria format and procedure for review of the programs and establish a termination schedule for the programs of the agencies which are not considered worthy of continuation.
(5) Separate legislation enacted by the General Assembly shall establish the programs of agencies to be reviewed and the termination date for those programs. Once the General Assembly has established a termination date for a program of an agency, the General Assembly may, at any time, by joint resolution, delete, substitute, add, or otherwise alter the termination schedule of the programs of the agencies.
(6) The existence of a program of an agency that is scheduled for termination under the provisions of this section may be reauthorized by the General Assembly for periods not to exceed five years, excluding the year of termination. A council review of an agency scheduled for termination is not required, but may be directed by the committee.
(7) The review and evaluation prepared by the council must be forwarded to the Governor, Ways and Means Committee, and Senate Finance Committee.
(D)(1) A zero-base budget is an agency budget developed using a process of preparing an operating plan or budget that starts with no authorized or appropriated funds. In a zero-based budget, each activity to be funded must be justified as the budget is prepared.
(2) In compliance with current literature on zero-base budgeting, the Office of State Budget of the State Budget and Control Board shall develop a format and criteria for an agency selected by the committee to use in preparing its zero-base budget for submission.
SECTION 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2-15-140(B) of the 1976 Code as added by this act, and for calendar year 2001 only, the Joint Zero-Base Budget and Agency Evaluation Selection Committee shall:
(1) before August, 2001, select four agencies for zero-base budget submission. These agencies are not subject to the evaluation otherwise required pursuant to Section 2-15-140(C) of the 1976 Code as added by this act, but they must make their zero-base budget submission to the Office of State Budget before November, 2001. The Governor is not required to apply zero-base budget principles in his recommended 2002-2003 fiscal year budget for these agencies;
(2) before August, 2001, select additional agencies subject to both the evaluation and zero-base budget requirement of Section 2-15-140 of the 1976 Code as added by this act, and the agencies selected shall make their zero-base budget submission before October, 2002.
SECTION 4. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
This web page was last updated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 at 11:30 A.M.