South Carolina Legislature


 

(Use of stop words in a search will not produce desired results.)
(For help with formatting search criteria, click here.)
Ben% found 9 times.    Next
S 1019
Session 111 (1995-1996)


S 1019 General Bill, By McConnell

Similar(H 4381) A Bill to amend the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, by adding Section 38-71-215 so as to prohibit a health benefitNext policy from requiring as a condition for the coverage of dermatological services that the insured first obtain a referral from a primary care physician. 01/11/96 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-6 01/11/96 Senate Referred to Committee on Medical Affairs SJ-6 02/06/96 Senate Recalled from Committee on Medical Affairs SJ-184 02/06/96 Senate Committed to Committee on Banking and Insurance SJ-184 03/05/96 Senate Committee report: Majority favorable, minority unfavorable Banking and Insurance SJ-10 03/14/96 Senate Minority report withdrawn SJ-16


COMMITTEE REPORT

March 5, 1996

S. 1019

Introduced by SENATOR McConnell

S. Printed 3/5/96--S.

Read the first time January 11, 1996.

THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND INSURANCE

To whom was referred a Bill (S. 1019), to amend the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, by adding Section 38-71-215 so as to prohibit a health PreviousbenefitNext policy from requiring as a condition for the coverage, etc., respectfully

REPORT:

That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass:

Majority favorable. Minority unfavorable.

EDWARD E. SALEEBY LARRY A. MARTIN

For Majority. For Minority.

A BILL

TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 38-71-215 SO AS TO PROHIBIT A HEALTH PreviousBENEFITNext POLICY FROM REQUIRING AS A CONDITION FOR THE COVERAGE OF DERMATOLOGICAL SERVICES THAT THE INSURED FIRST OBTAIN A REFERRAL FROM A PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN.

Whereas, it is the intent of the General Assembly to encourage health care cost containment while preserving the quality of care offered to citizens of this State. The General Assembly finds that there is an increasing number of health insurance PreviousbenefitNext providers which require a referral from a primary care physician to a dermatologist as a condition of the payment of PreviousbenefitsNext to an insured patient. The General Assembly finds that such a requirement blocks unfairly a patient's choice of direct access to providers of health care services and may not be in the public interest. Now, therefore,

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 38-71-215. (A) No health policy which is issued, delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this State may require as a condition for the coverage of dermatological services that an enrollee, subscriber, or insured first obtain a referral from a primary care physician.

(B) As used in this section:

(1) `Dermatological services' means services ordinarily and customarily rendered by a physician specializing in the practice of dermatology;

(2) `Health PreviousbenefitNext policy' means an individual or group plan, policy, or contract for health care services issued, delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this State by a health care corporation, health maintenance organization, accident and sickness insurer, fraternal PreviousbenefitNext society, nonprofit hospital service corporation, nonprofit medical service corporation, or similar entity;

(3) `Primary care physician' means a physician as defined in the health PreviousbenefitNext policy."

SECTION 2. This act takes effect July 1, 1996, and applies to health Previousbenefit policies as defined in Section 38-71-215 of the 1976 Code, as added by Section 1 of this act, that are issued, delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this State after July 1, 1996.

-----XX-----



Legislative Services Agency
h t t p : / / w w w . s c s t a t e h o u s e . g o v