H 3008 General Bill, By Bales

Similar(S 392)
 A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION
 56-5-100 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A STATE STATUTE THAT REGULATES HIGHWAY TRAFFIC
 PREEMPTS A LOCAL ORDINANCE, RULE OR REGULATION THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE
 STATUTE, AND THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL BODY MAY NOT ENACT A PROVISION THAT
 CONFLICTS WITH A STATE STATUTE THAT REGULATES HIGHWAY TRAFFIC; AND TO AMEND
 SECTION 56-5-30, RELATING TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE STATE'S UNIFORM TRAFFIC
 LAWS UPON THE STATE'S POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION
 THAT ALLOWS A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE TO ADOPT TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
 WHICH ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE STATUTES THAT REGULATE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC.

   12/11/14  House  Prefiled
   12/11/14  House  Referred to Committee on Judiciary
   01/13/15  House  Introduced and read first time (House Journal-page 62)
   01/13/15  House  Referred to Committee on Judiciary
                     (House Journal-page 62)
   05/14/15  House  Recalled from Committee on Judiciary
                     (House Journal-page 20)
   05/20/15  House  Requests for debate-Rep(s). Brannon, Hicks,
                     George, Daning, Taylor, Gilliard, Chumly, Burns,
                     Forrester, Kirby, Whipper, Ridgeway, RL Brown,
                     Tallon, Southard, Ott, Bamberg, Jefferson
                     (House Journal-page 27)
   06/02/15  House  Requests for debate removed-Rep(s). Whipper, RL
                     Brown, Tallon, Daning (House Journal-page 51)
   06/03/15  House  Amended (House Journal-page 176)
   06/03/15  House  Read second time (House Journal-page 176)
   06/03/15  House  Roll call Yeas-95  Nays-6 (House Journal-page 178)
   06/04/15  House  Requests for debate removed-Rep(s). Jefferson
                     (House Journal-page 10)
   06/04/15  House  Read third time and sent to Senate
                     (House Journal-page 29)
   06/04/15  Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal-page 13)
   06/04/15  Senate Referred to Committee on Transportation
                     (Senate Journal-page 13)
   06/04/15         Scrivener's error corrected

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

AMENDED

June 3, 2015

H. 3008

S. Printed 6/3/15--H.    [SEC 6/4/15 4:10 PM]

Read the first time January 13, 2015.

TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 56-5-100 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A STATE STATUTE THAT REGULATES HIGHWAY TRAFFIC PREEMPTS A LOCAL ORDINANCE, RULE OR REGULATION THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE STATUTE, AND THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL BODY MAY NOT ENACT A PROVISION THAT CONFLICTS WITH A STATE STATUTE THAT REGULATES HIGHWAY TRAFFIC; AND TO AMEND SECTION 56-5-30, RELATING TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE STATE'S UNIFORM TRAFFIC LAWS UPON THE STATE'S POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT ALLOWS A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE TO ADOPT TRAFFIC REGULATIONS WHICH ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE STATUTES THAT REGULATE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC.

Amend Title To Conform

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Section 56-5-30 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 56-5-30.    The provisions of this chapter shall be applicable and uniform throughout this State and in all political subdivisions and municipalities therein, and no local authority shall enact or enforce any ordinance, rule or regulation in conflict with the provisions of this chapter unless expressly authorized herein. Local authorities may, however, subject to the limitations prescribed in Section 56-5-930, adopt additional traffic regulations which are not in conflict with the provisions of this chapter and do not impose a fine that is in excess of two hundred dollars. All such fines imposed are subject to the set-aside distributions required by Sections 14-1-201 through 14-1-214, and the governing body of the political subdivision must ensure that the set-aside distributions are remitted in the manner required by law. Where an audit report confirms that on at least three or more occasions the set-aside distributions were not properly remitted during the audit period, the political subdivision concerned may not continue to send its officers to the Criminal Justice Academy for training and certification until a subsequent audit report confirms that there are not three or more set-aside distribution violations during that audit period."

SECTION    2.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.