S 226 Session 110 (1993-1994)
S 0226 General Bill, By Leatherman
Similar(H 3856)
A Bill to amend the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, by adding Section
11-27-110 so as to provide lease-purchase or lease-back agreements involving
real property entered into by the State or political subdivisions of the state
wherein the state or political subdivision is the lessee constitutes general
obligation debt for the period of the lease and to provide that this general
obligation debt may not violate the constitutional debt limitations applicable
to the state or political subdivision under Article X of the State
Constitution.
01/19/93 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-11
01/19/93 Senate Referred to Committee on Finance SJ-11
02/02/94 Senate Committee report: Favorable with amendment Finance SJ-9
02/10/94 Senate Special order SJ-104
03/08/94 Senate Amended SJ-19
03/08/94 Senate Read second time SJ-19
03/08/94 Senate Ordered to third reading with notice of
amendments SJ-19
03/10/94 Senate Special order SJ-24
03/31/94 Senate Amended SJ-359
03/31/94 Senate Read third time and sent to House SJ-359
04/05/94 House Introduced, read first time, placed on calendar
without reference HJ-52
04/20/94 House Debate adjourned until Wednesday, April 27, 1994 HJ-60
04/27/94 House Debate adjourned until Thursday, April 28, 1994 HJ-22
04/28/94 House Debate adjourned until Tuesday, May 3, 1994 HJ-321
05/03/94 House Debate adjourned until Wednesday, May 4, 1994 HJ-4
05/04/94 House Objection by Rep. Wofford, Williams, Neal,
Stille, Gonzales, HJ-22
05/04/94 House Objection by Rep. Keyserling, Law, Elliott,
D.Wilder & Jennings HJ-22
05/04/94 House Objection by Rep. Scott & Anderson HJ-22
06/01/94 House Objection withdrawn by Rep. Scott & Anderson HJ-104
INTRODUCED
April 5, 1994
S. 226
Introduced by SENATOR Leatherman
S. Printed 4/5/94--H.
Read the first time April 5, 1994.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL
IMPACT
1. Estimated Cost to State-First Year $-0-
2. Estimated Cost to State-Annually
Thereafter $-0-
S. 226 amends Section 11-17-110 of the South Carolina Code of
Laws, 1976, to provide that lease-purchase and lease-back agreements
entered into by the State or a political subdivision constitutes general
obligation debt. Further, the general obligation debt incurred by these
agreements may not violate the constitutional debt limitations
applicable under Article X of the State Constitution.
Pursuant to Section 2-7-76 of the South Carolina Code of Laws,
1976, the State Budget Division surveyed 39 cities and counties on the
Fiscal Impact Statement Team (FIST) network and 24 (64%)
responses were received. The following cities and counties reported
such agreements below:
Subdivision #of Lease Agmt. Amount
Greenville Cnty 1 $22.0 million
York Cnty 1
Beaufort Cnty 2 $22.7 million
Cty of Rock Hill 2
Cty of Myrtle Beach 1
Cty of Goose Creek 1 $2.36 million
Florence Cnty 2 $50.0 million
Orangeburg Cnty 2 $5.5 million
Cty of N. Charleston 1 $20.1 million
In addition, Laurens County reported that it does not have a lease
agreement at this time, but this could be a viable financing option
when the county constructs its new jail, which is presently in the
planning phase. Most local subdivisions reported this new
classification would cause them to exceed the constitutional debt
limitation. Also, some localities with lease agreements reported this
legislation could cause legal problems for them and restrict their
ability to finance various projects.
The schedule below represents the Debt Service Limitations for the
State for FY 1993-94 and its Debt Service need for FY 1993-94
including the debt for real property lease purchases if this bill should
pass.
Debt Service Limitation
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Debt Service Constitutional Limitation
Fiscal Year 1993-94
FY 1992-93 General Fund Revenues $3,567,159,627
(8-21-92 BEA Estimate)
Less: Debt Service Transfers
(FY 1992-93)
Highway 0
Institution (6,622,237)
Subtotal $3,560,537,390
5%
Debt Service Limitation for
FY 1993-94 $ 178,026,870
Debt Service Need for FY 1993-94
Projected Debt Service Need for
CIB's (P & I) $ 131,579,930
Projected Debt Service Need for
Real Property LP $ 5,618,472
Total Debt Service Funds Needed for
FY 1993-94 $ 137,198,402
The Difference Between Debt Service
Need to Limitation $ 40,828,468 Relationship of
Debt Service Need to Limitation
Debt Service Need $137,198,402
-------------------- ------------ = 77.1% or
3.86% of FY
92-93 GF
Revenues
Debt Service Limitation $178,026,870
Prepared By: Approved By:
K. Earle Powell George N. Dorn, Jr.
State Budget Analyst State Budget Division
Allan Kincaid
Chief Budget Analyst
A BILL
TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976,
BY ADDING SECTION 11-27-110 SO AS TO PROVIDE LEASE-PURCHASE OR LEASE-BACK AGREEMENTS INVOLVING
REAL PROPERTY ENTERED INTO BY THE STATE OR
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE WHEREIN THE
STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS THE LESSEE
CONSTITUTES GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT FOR THE
PERIOD OF THE LEASE AND TO PROVIDE THAT THIS
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT MAY NOT VIOLATE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL DEBT LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE
STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION UNDER ARTICLE X OF
THE STATE CONSTITUTION.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:
"Section 11-27-110. (A) As used in this section:
(1) `asset' means any real property and permanent
improvements thereon including structures, buildings, and fixtures;
(2) `bond act' means:
(i) the county bond act, as contained in Chapter 15 of Title
4;
(ii) the municipal bond act, as contained in Article 5, Chapter
21 of Title 5;
(iii) the school bond act as contained in Article 1, Chapter 71
of Title 59;
(iv) the provisions contained in Articles 3 and 5 of Chapter 11
of Title 6 pertaining to special purpose districts;
(v) any provision of law by which the State may issue
obligations secured in whole or in part by the full faith, credit, and
taxing power of the State, and;
(vi) any other law, general or special, providing for the
issuance of general obligation bonds by the State or any of its political
subdivisions;
(3) `constitutional debt limit' for the State or any political
subdivision thereof which has the power to incur general obligation
bonded indebtedness, means the limitation of the principal amount of
general obligation bonded indebtedness specified in Article X of the
Constitution;
(4) `enterprise financing agreement' means a financing
agreement entered into to provide an asset for a governmental
enterprise the revenues from which are expected to be sufficient to pay
the amounts due under the financing agreement;
(5) `financing agreement' means any contract entered into on or
after January 1, 1995, under the terms of which a governmental entity
acquires the use of an asset which provides:
(i) for payments to be made in more than one fiscal year,
whether by the stated term of the contract or under any renewal
provisions, optional or otherwise,
(ii) that the payments thereunder are divided into principal
and interest components or which contain any reference to any portion
of any payment thereunder being treated as interest and,
(iii) that title to the asset will be in the name of or be
transferred to the governmental entity if all payments scheduled or
provided for in the financing agreement are made, but the term
excludes any contracts entered into in connection with issues of
general obligation bonds or revenue bonds issued pursuant to
authorization provided in Article X of the Constitution;
(6) `governmental enterprise' means any activity undertaken by
a governmental entity which derives revenues from or because of the
activity on a basis other than the exercise of the power of taxation by
that governmental entity;
(7) `governmental entity' means the State and any political
subdivision of the State, including a municipality, county, school
district, special purpose district, or similar entity, whose general
obligation debt is subject to the limitations set forth in Article X of the
Constitution;
(8) `limited bonded indebtedness' means the amount of bonded
indebtedness that may be incurred by a governmental entity without
a referendum or, where the context requires, the amount of such
indebtedness then outstanding; and
(9) `principal balance' means the total amount, excluding any
amount characterized as interest, payable as of any time of
consideration under any financing agreement, including any renewals
or extensions thereof.
(B) No governmental entity may enter into a financing agreement,
other than an enterprise financing agreement, if the principal balance
of the financing agreement, when added to the principal amount of
limited bonded indebtedness outstanding on the date of execution of
the financing agreement would exceed eight percent of the assessed
value of taxable property in the jurisdiction of the governmental entity
unless the financing agreement is approved by a majority of the
electors voting thereon in a referendum duly called for such purpose
by the governmental entity.
(C) In addition to such other terms and conditions as are specified
in any bond act, if a governmental entity has outstanding any
financing agreement, other than an enterprise financing agreement, the
authorization contained in any bond act permitting the governmental
entity to incur general obligation bonded indebtedness is hereby
amended to provide that on the date of issuance of any limited bonded
indebtedness pursuant to the bond act, the amount thereof plus the
amount of all other limited bonded indebtedness of the governmental
entity, when added to the principal balance under any financing
agreement or agreements of such governmental entity shall not exceed
the amount of the governmental entity's constitutional debt limit
unless such bonded indebtedness is approved by a majority of the
electors voting thereon in a referendum duly called for such purpose
by such governmental entity."
SECTION 2. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:
"Section 59-17-35. Bonds issued by a school district under
the bonded indebtedness limitation of Article X, Section 14(7)(a) of
the South Carolina Constitution and called before the maturity date
only may be reissued if the amount required to service the reissuance
and to pay off the called bonds does not:
(1) increase by more than eight percent in any one year the
amount of the district's budget needed to service the original bonded
indebtedness; or
(2) exceed the debt limit of the district."
SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
-----XX----- |