S*1534 Session 107 (1987-1988)
S*1534(Rat #0781, Act #0690 of 1988) Joint Resolution, By P.B. McLeod,
Matthews and J.M. Waddell
A Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to Section 13 of Article VIII of the
Constitution of South Carolina, 1895, relating to the joint administration of
functions and the exercise of powers by counties, municipalities, or other
political subdivisions, so as to provide that counties subject to the General
Assembly first providing by law for bonded indebtedness and school fiscal
ability considerations, may jointly develop an industrial or business park
with other counties within the geographical boundaries of one or more of the
member counties, where the area comprising the parks and all property having a
situs therein is exempt from all ad valorem taxation because the owners or
lessees of any property situated in the park must pay an amount equivalent to
the property taxes or other in-lieu-of payments that would have been due and
payable except for the above exemption.-amended title
05/25/88 Senate Introduced, read first time, placed on calendar
without reference SJ-13
05/26/88 Senate Read second time SJ-38
05/26/88 Senate Unanimous consent for third reading on next
legislative day SJ-42
05/27/88 Senate Read third time and sent to House SJ-36
05/30/88 House Introduced, read first time, placed on calendar
without reference HJ-4283
06/01/88 House Amended HJ-4543
06/01/88 House Read second time HJ-4545
06/01/88 House Unanimous consent for third reading on next
legislative day HJ-4545
06/02/88 House Read third time HJ-4669
06/02/88 House Returned HJ-4669
06/02/88 Senate Concurred in House amendment and enrolled SJ-58
06/20/88 Ratified R 781
06/20/88 No signature required
06/20/88 Act No. 690
08/01/88 Copies available
(A690, R781, S1534)
A JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 13 OF ARTICLE VIII OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO THE JOINT ADMINISTRATION OF
FUNCTIONS AND THE EXERCISE OF POWERS BY COUNTIES, MUNICIPALITIES, OR OTHER
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT COUNTIES, SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL
ASSEMBLY FIRST PROVIDING BY LAW FOR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND SCHOOL FISCAL ABILITY
CONSIDERATIONS, MAY JOINTLY DEVELOP AN INDUSTRIAL OR BUSINESS PARK WITH OTHER
COUNTIES WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES OF ONE OR MORE OF THE MEMBER COUNTIES
WHERE THE AREA COMPRISING THE PARKS AND ALL PROPERTY HAVING A SITUS THEREIN IS
EXEMPT FROM ALL AD VALOREM TAXATION BECAUSE THE OWNERS OR LESSEES OF ANY PROPERTY
SITUATED IN THE PARK MUST PAY AN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO THE PROPERTY TAXES OR OTHER
IN-LIEU-OF PAYMENTS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DUE AND PAYABLE EXCEPT FOR THE ABOVE
EXEMPTION.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
Amendment proposed for joint county development
SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 13 of Article VIII of the Constitution
of this State be amended to read:
"Section 13. (A) Any county, incorporated municipality, or other
political subdivision may agree with the State or with any other political
subdivision for the joint administration of any function and exercise of powers
and the sharing of the costs thereof.
(B) Nothing in this Constitution may be construed to prohibit the State or any
of its counties, incorporated municipalities, or other political subdivisions
from agreeing to share the lawful cost, responsibility, and administration of
functions with any one or more governments, whether within or without this State.
(C) The prohibitions against dual officeholding contained in Article VI of
this Constitution do not apply to any elected or appointed official or employee
who serves on a regional council of government created under the authority of
this section.
(D) Counties may jointly develop an industrial or business park with other
counties within the geographical boundaries of one or more of the member
counties. The area comprising the parks and all property having a situs therein
is exempt from all ad valorem taxation. The owners or lessees of any property
situated in the park shall pay an amount equivalent to the property taxes or
other in-lieu-of payments that would have been due and payable except for the
exemption herein provided. The participating counties shall reduce the agreement
to develop and share expenses and revenues of the park to a written instrument
which is binding on all participating counties. Included within expenses are the
costs to provide public services such as sewage, water, fire, and police
protection. Notwithstanding the above provisions of this subsection, before a
group of member counties may establish an industrial or business park as
authorized herein, the General Assembly must first provide by law for the manner
in which the value of the property in the park will be considered for purposes
of bonded indebtedness of political subdivisions and school districts and for
purposes of computing the index of taxpaying ability pursuant to any provision
of law which measures the relative fiscal capacity of a school district to
support its schools based on the assessed valuation of taxable property in the
district as compared to the assessed valuation of the taxable property in all
school districts of this State."
Question on ballot
SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors
at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at
the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the
ballot:
"Shall Section 13 of Article VIII of the Constitution of this State be
amended so as to provide that counties, subject to the General Assembly first
providing by law for bonded indebtedness and school fiscal ability
considerations, may jointly develop an industrial or business park with other
counties within the geographical boundaries of one or more of the member counties
where the area comprising the parks and all property having a situs therein is
exempt from all ad valorem taxation because the owners or lessees of any property
situated in the park must pay an amount equivalent to the property taxes or other
in-lieu-of payments that would have been due and payable except for the above
exemption?
Yes / /
No / /
Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or
cross mark in the square after the word 'Yes', and those voting against the
question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after
the word 'No'."
Ratified the 20th day of June, 1988. |