South Carolina Legislature


 

(Use of stop words in a search will not produce desired results.)
(For help with formatting search criteria, click here.)
article% found 5 times.    Next
S 59
Session 111 (1995-1996)


S 0059 Joint Resolution, By McConnell, Giese, Gregory, L.E. Richter, M.T. Rose, 
Ryberg and Wilson

Similar(H 3058) A Joint Resolution proposing an amendment to Section 22 of ArticleNext V of the Constitution of South Carolina, 1895, relating to grand and petit juries, so as to provide that ten or more members instead of all twelve members of a jury shall vote in favor of imposing the death penalty where a defendant has been convicted of murder in order for the death penalty to be imposed. 10/03/94 Senate Prefiled 10/03/94 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary 01/10/95 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-27 01/10/95 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-27 01/25/95 Senate Committee report: Majority favorable, minority unfavorable Judiciary SJ-15 02/07/95 Senate Debate interrupted SJ-31 02/08/95 Senate Debate interrupted SJ-20 02/09/95 Senate Debate interrupted SJ-19 02/14/95 Senate Debate interrupted SJ-18 02/15/95 Senate Debate interrupted SJ-20 02/22/95 Senate Recommitted to Committee on Judiciary SJ-19


COMMITTEE REPORT

January 25, 1995

S. 59

Introduced by SENATORS McConnell, Wilson, Ryberg, Rose, Gregory, Giese and Richter

S. Printed 1/25/95--S.

Read the first time January 10, 1995.

THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

To whom was referred a Joint Resolution (S. 59), proposing an amendment to Section 22 of PreviousArticleNext V of the Constitution of South Carolina, 1895, relating to grand and petit juries, etc., respectfully

REPORT:

That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass:

Majority favorable. Minority unfavorable.

GLENN F. McCONNELL ROBERT FORD

For Majority. For Minority.

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 22 OF PreviousARTICLENext V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO GRAND AND PETIT JURIES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT TEN OR MORE MEMBERS INSTEAD OF ALL TWELVE MEMBERS OF A JURY SHALL VOTE IN FAVOR OF IMPOSING THE DEATH PENALTY WHERE A DEFENDANT HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF MURDER IN ORDER FOR THE DEATH PENALTY TO BE IMPOSED.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 22 of PreviousArticleNext V of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, to impose the death penalty on a defendant convicted of murder, only ten or more members of the jury shall vote in favor of imposing the death penalty."

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

"Must Section 22 of PreviousArticle V of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to provide that ten or more members instead of all twelve members of a jury shall vote in favor of imposing the death penalty where a defendant has been convicted of murder in order for the death penalty to be imposed?

Yes []

No []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word `No'."

-----XX-----



Legislative Services Agency
h t t p : / / w w w . s c s t a t e h o u s e . g o v