South Carolina Legislature


 

(Use of stop words in a search will not produce desired results.)
(For help with formatting search criteria, click here.)
at% found 21 times.    Next
H 3398
Session 113 (1999-2000)


H 3398 General Bill, By Robinson, Kelley, Simrill, H. Brown, Sandifer, Fleming, 
Easterday, McKay, Rice, Leach, D. Smith, Hamilton, Klauber, Trotter, Haskins, 
Harrison, Vaughn and Barrett
 A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 15-77-300, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976,
 RELATING TO THE AWARDING OF ATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN STATE INITIATED ACTIONS, SO AS
 TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE AWARDING OF PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN SUCH ACTIONS AND IN
 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 15-77-310, RELATING TO
 PETITIONING FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES, SO AS TO REVISE THE TIME WITHIN WHICH THE
 PREVAILING PARTY MUST PETITION FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES AND TO PERMIT A PETITION
 FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS.

   01/28/99  House  Introduced and read first time HJ-8
   01/28/99  House  Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-8
   03/25/99  House  Committee report: Favorable with amendment
                     Judiciary HJ-4
   03/31/99  House  Debate adjourned until Tuesday, April 6, 1999 HJ-22
   04/06/99  House  Amended HJ-25
   04/06/99  House  Read second time HJ-28
   04/07/99  House  Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-13
   04/08/99  Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-9
   04/08/99  Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-9
   05/31/00  Senate Recalled from Committee on Judiciary SJ-10





Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

RECALLED

May 31, 2000

H. 3398

Introduced by Reps. Robinson, Kelley, Simrill, H. Brown, Sandifer, Fleming, Easterday, McKay, Rice, Leach, D. Smith, Hamilton, Klauber, Trotter, Haskins, Harrison, Vaughn and Barrett

S. Printed 5/31/00--S. [SEC 6/1/00 4:40 PM]

Read the first time April 8, 1999.

            

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES IS:

A Cost to the General Fund of the State (See Below)

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON FEDERAL & OTHER FUND EXPENDITURES IS:

$0 (No additional expenditures or savings are expected)

EXPLANATION OF GENERAL FUND IMPACT:

PreviousAttorneyNext General's Office

The PreviousAttorneyNext General's office forecasts a potential cost to the General Fund of the State pursuant to Section 15-77-300. However, the PreviousAttorneyNext General's office notes that the amount is currently not quantifiable. Pointing out that the passage of the bill would certainly expose the state to a greater liability, the PreviousAttorneyNext General's office notes that the liability would result from the inclusion of proceedings that are either brought by or against the state as opposed to only proceedings brought by the state.

Regarding the proposed amendment, the PreviousAttorneyNext General's office projects that passage of this bill will still open the state up to a material liability that is not quantifiable. The reasoning for this is that liability will be increased by amending Section 15-77-300 to include that in any action, regardless of which party brings the action, the prevailing private party may be awarded fees against the state. The decision to award fees will be determined by a tribunal, which implies more than one person will have to agree on such award.

Administrative Law Judge Division

The Administrative Law Judge Division forecasts no potential cost to the General Fund of the State with the passage of the proposed legislation.

Approved By:

Don Addy

Office of State Budget

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTION 15-77-300, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE AWARDING OF PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN STATE INITIATED ACTIONS, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE AWARDING OF PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN SUCH ACTIONS AND IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 15-77-310, RELATING TO PETITIONING FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES, SO AS TO REVISE THE TIME WITHIN WHICH THE PREVAILING PARTY MUST PETITION FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES AND TO PERMIT A PETITION FOR PreviousATTORNEYNext'S FEES IN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. Section 15-77-300 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 15-77-300. In any civil action brought by the State, any political subdivision of the State or any party who is contesting state action, unless the prevailing party is the State or any political subdivision of the State, the court may allow the prevailing party to recover reasonable PreviousattorneyNext's fees to be taxed as court costs against the appropriate agency if:

(1) The court finds that the agency acted without substantial justification in pressing its claim against the party; and

(2) The court finds that there are no special circumstances that would make the award of PreviousattorneyNext's fees unjust.

In any civil action or administrative proceeding, a prevailing private party may be awarded PreviousattorneyNext's fees against the State, or a political subdivision or agency of the State, if the court, chief procurement officer, administrative law judge, procurement review panel, or other appropriate tribunal finds that:

(1) the State, or a political subdivision or agency of the State, acted without substantial justification in bringing or defending its claims against the prevailing private party; and

(2) there are no special circumstances that would make the award of PreviousattorneyNext's fees unjust.

The provisions of this section do not apply to civil actions relating to the establishment of public utility rates, disciplinary actions by state licensing boards, habeas corpus or post conviction relief actions, child support actions, except as otherwise provided for herein, and child abuse and neglect actions, except as provided by law."

SECTION 2. Section 15-77-310 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 15-77-310. The A private party entitled to PreviousattorneyNext's fees shall petition for the Previousattorney's fees within thirty days following the later of:

(1) final disposition of the case.; or

(2) the issuance of a final administrative decision.

The petition must be supported by an affidavit setting forth the basis for the request."

SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----



Legislative Services Agency
h t t p : / / w w w . s c s t a t e h o u s e . g o v