H 4041 Session 109 (1991-1992)
H 4041 Joint Resolution, By Koon, M.O. Alexander, L.E. Bennett, G.A. Brown,
D.M. Bruce, P.M. Burch, C.D. Chamblee, J.G. Felder, McKay, M. McLeod, Rhoad,
Sharpe, J.R. Shirley, R. Smith, J.J. Snow, D.C. Waldrop, J.B. Wilder and
D. Williams
A Joint Resolution providing that, with reference to the proposal of the State
Superintendent of Education to merge fifty-two supervisory positions into
twenty-four positions with the result that more than twenty-eight employees of
the State Department of Education could lose their jobs, the persons
ultimately selected to fill the twenty-four positions must come from the group
of persons occupying the current fifty-two positions, providing that those
employees in the current group of fifty-two who have less than five years
before retirement shall have priority for the twenty-four positions to be
filled, and requiring that certain procedures be followed before the State
Superintendent's proposal may be implemented.
06/05/91 House Introduced and read first time HJ-5
06/05/91 House Referred to Committee on Ways and Means HJ-6
03/04/92 House Tabled in committee
A JOINT RESOLUTION
PROVIDING THAT, WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSAL OF
THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION TO MERGE
FIFTY-TWO SUPERVISORY POSITIONS INTO TWENTY-FOUR
POSITIONS WITH THE RESULT THAT MORE THAN
TWENTY-EIGHT EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION COULD LOSE THEIR JOBS, THE PERSONS
ULTIMATELY SELECTED TO FILL THE TWENTY-FOUR
POSITIONS MUST COME FROM THE GROUP OF PERSONS
OCCUPYING THE CURRENT FIFTY-TWO POSITIONS,
PROVIDING THAT THOSE EMPLOYEES IN THE CURRENT
GROUP OF FIFTY-TWO WHO HAVE LESS THAN FIVE YEARS
BEFORE RETIREMENT SHALL HAVE PRIORITY FOR THE
TWENTY-FOUR POSITIONS TO BE FILLED, AND REQUIRING
THAT CERTAIN PROCEDURES BE FOLLOWED BEFORE THE
STATE SUPERINTENDENT'S PROPOSAL MAY BE
IMPLEMENTED.
Whereas, the State Superintendent of Education has announced a
restructuring move that would merge fifty-two supervisory positions into
twenty-four positions, with the result that more than twenty-eight
employees of the State Department of Education could lose their jobs;
and
Whereas, this proposal of the State Superintendent's has caused the
members of the General Assembly deep concern; and
Whereas, most of these fifty-two loyal, dedicated state workers have
been with the Department of Education for more than ten years, and, in
some instances, the affected employees have more than twenty-five
years of service and others are within a year of retirement eligibility; and
Whereas, the State Superintendent stated that she would be searching for
replacement personnel in this scheme who "share her
philosophy"; and
Whereas, the members of the General Assembly view the State
Superintendent's action with alarm, inasmuch as this State's, as well as
the nation's, economy is in the middle of a severe recession, and the
individuals affected at the Department of Education face the prospect of
protracted unemployment; and
Whereas, the State Superintendent's plan jeopardizes, in numerous
instances, outstanding careers of service to the public in state
government and has the effect of destroying the concept of "career
state service" for employees who perform well; and
Whereas, the use of a large amount of funds involved in the State
Superintendent's plan of "restructuring" should receive close
scrutiny by the General Assembly; and
Whereas, the effects of the State Superintendent's proposal on the
Department of Education, the State of South Carolina, the State's
economy, and the lives of the state employees involved and the concern
this gives to all state employees should be examined in detail before any
proposal is allowed to be put into effect; and
Whereas, before anything is done at the State Department of Education
along the lines outlined by the State Superintendent in her proposal of
"restructuring" this agency, the State Superintendent should
present her proposals not only to the State Budget and Control Board but
also to the State Reorganization Commission, the Governor's Office, the
Senate Education Committee, and the House Education and Public
Works Committee and should receive the approval and backing of all of
these bodies before actually carrying out her plans; and
Whereas, it is only in this way that the General Assembly and the
general public can have confidence that the State Superintendent's
proposals have true merit; and
Whereas, if the State Superintendent's proposal receives the approval of
the State Budget and Control Board, the State Reorganization
Commission, the Governor's Office, the Senate Education Committee,
and the House Education and Public Works Committee, then in all
fairness the persons selected by the State Superintendent to fill the
twenty-four positions should come from the group of persons occupying
the current fifty-two positions, and those employees in the current group
of fifty-two who have less than five years before retirement should be
accorded priority for the twenty-four positions to be filled. Now,
therefore,
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with
reference to the proposal of the State Superintendent of Education,
announced in May, 1991, to merge fifty-two supervisory positions into
twenty-four positions the following are mandated:
(1) The State Superintendent shall present the proposal of
restructuring to the State Budget and Control Board, the State
Reorganization Commission, the Governor's Office, the Senate
Education Committee, and the House Education and Public Works
Committee, and each of these bodies must approve the proposal before
it may be implemented.
(2) If all of the bodies referenced in item (1) of this section
approve the proposal, the persons selected by the State Superintendent
of Education to fill the twenty-four positions must come from the group
of persons occupying the current fifty-two positions. The employees in
the current group of fifty-two who have less than five years before
retirement must be accorded priority for the twenty-four positions to be
filled.
SECTION 2. This joint resolution takes effect upon approval by the
Governor.
-----XX----- |