Loading...
Session 115 - (2003-2004)Printer Friendly
(pdf format)
H 3082 General Bill, By Scarborough, Simrill, Hinson, Merrill, White, Trotter, Thompson, M.A. Pitts, Duncan, Barfield, Edge, Clemmons, Viers and Bailey
Similar (S 0328, S 0662)
Summary: Regulations, 120 day provision deleted, General Assembly must affirm approval
A BILL TO AMEND SECTIONS 1-23-120 AND 1-23-125, BOTH AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BOTH RELATING TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND REQUESTS TO WITHDRAW REGULATIONS, SO AS TO REQUIRE AFFIRMATIVE APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS RATHER THAN ALLOWING THEM TO BECOME EFFECTIVE AFTER ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS, TO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE ONE-HUNDRED-TWENTY-DAY PERIOD AND TO PROVIDE THAT IF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE A REGULATION HAS NOT BEEN ENACTED BY THE END OF THE SECOND YEAR OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION, THE REGULATION MUST BE PROMULGATED AS A NEW REGULATION BEFORE SUBMITTING FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL.
View full text
Similar (S 0328, S 0662)
Summary: Regulations, 120 day provision deleted, General Assembly must affirm approval
A BILL TO AMEND SECTIONS 1-23-120 AND 1-23-125, BOTH AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BOTH RELATING TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND REQUESTS TO WITHDRAW REGULATIONS, SO AS TO REQUIRE AFFIRMATIVE APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS RATHER THAN ALLOWING THEM TO BECOME EFFECTIVE AFTER ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS, TO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE ONE-HUNDRED-TWENTY-DAY PERIOD AND TO PROVIDE THAT IF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE A REGULATION HAS NOT BEEN ENACTED BY THE END OF THE SECOND YEAR OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION, THE REGULATION MUST BE PROMULGATED AS A NEW REGULATION BEFORE SUBMITTING FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL.
View full text
12/04/02 | House | Prefiled |
12/04/02 | House | Referred to Committee on Judiciary |
01/14/03 | House | Introduced and read first time HJ-37 |
01/14/03 | House | Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-37 |
02/11/03 | House | Member(s) request name added as sponsor: White, Trotter, Thompson |
02/26/03 | House | Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary HJ-106 |
02/27/03 | House | Member(s) request name added as sponsor: M.A.Pitts, Duncan |
02/27/03 | House | Requests for debate-Rep(s). Scarborough, Harrison, McLeod, Talley, Kennedy, Richardson, Thompson, White, Bailey, JE Brown, Hinson, Merrill, EH Pitts, Snow, Toole, Jennings, Altman, Anthony, Freeman, Whipper, R Brown, Mack, Loftis, Coates, Leach, Davenport, Vaughn, Rice, Hosey and Bowers HJ-16 |
03/05/03 | House | Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Barfield, Edge, Clemmons |
03/06/03 | House | Debate interrupted HJ-34 |
03/19/03 | House | Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Viers, Bailey |
03/19/03 | House | Amended HJ-48 |
03/19/03 | House | Read second time HJ-59 |
03/19/03 | House | Roll call Yeas-74 Nays-33 HJ-59 |
03/20/03 | Scrivener's error corrected | |
03/25/03 | House | Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-38 |
03/26/03 | Senate | Introduced and read first time SJ-19 |
03/26/03 | Senate | Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-19 |
05/22/03 | Senate | Committee report: Majority favorable with amend., minority unfavorable Judiciary SJ-13 |
05/27/03 | Scrivener's error corrected | |
03/02/04 | Senate | Special order SJ-19 |
03/16/04 | Senate | Amended SJ-23 |
05/06/04 | Senate | Read second time SJ-29 |
05/06/04 | Senate | Ordered to third reading with notice of amendments SJ-29 |
05/06/04 | Senate | Minority report withdrawn SJ-29 |
05/06/04 | Senate | Debate adjourned SJ-29 |
05/19/04 | Senate | Amended SJ-75 |
05/26/04 | Scrivener's error corrected |