H 4657 General Bill, By Haskins, Pinson, Duncan, Vaughn, Altman, Dantzler, 
Davenport, Hamilton, Leach, M.A. Pitts, Taylor, Walker, Wilkins, Young, 
Mahaffey, Coates, Sandifer, Talley, Whitmire, Hagood, Rice, Owens, G.M. Smith, 
Simrill, Toole, Bingham, E.H. Pitts, Viers, Chellis, Clark and G.R. Smith

Similar(S 996, H 4674)
 A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 20-1-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976,
 RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT SAME
 SEX MARRIAGES IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION HAS NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS
 STATE; AND TO ADD SECTION 20-1-17 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IT IS AGAINST PUBLIC
 POLICY TO EXTEND OR RECOGNIZE STATUTORY BENEFITS OF A LEGAL MARRIAGE TO
 NONMARITAL RELATIONSHIPS AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE THAT ANY PUBLIC ACT, RECORD,
 OR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING OF THIS STATE THAT EXTENDS SUCH BENEFITS TO NONMARITAL
 RELATIONSHIPS HAS NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS STATE, TO PROVIDE
 EXCEPTIONS FOR BENEFITS ENJOYED BY ALL PERSONS, MARRIED OR UNMARRIED, AND FOR
 PRIVATE AGREEMENTS VALID UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE, AND TO PROVIDE THAT
 BENEFITS OF A LEGAL MARRIAGE EXTENDED TO NONMARITAL RELATIONSHIPS IN ANOTHER
 JURISDICTION HAVE NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS STATE.

   01/29/04  House  Introduced and read first time HJ-37
   01/29/04  House  Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-38
   01/29/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Mahaffey
   02/10/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Coates
   02/11/04  House  Member(s) request name removed as sponsor: Umphlett
   02/11/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor:
                     Sandifer, Talley, Whitmire
   02/17/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Hagood
   02/19/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Rice,
                     Owens, G.M.Smith
   02/25/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Simrill
   02/25/04  House  Committee report: Favorable with amendment
                     Judiciary HJ-6
   02/26/04         Scrivener's error corrected
   03/02/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Toole
   03/03/04  House  Requests for debate-Rep(s). Scott, JH Neal,
                     Rutherford, Kennedy, Cobb-Hunter, JE Smith,
                     Hosey, Jennings, and Whipper HJ-20
   03/16/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Bingham,
                     E.H.Pitts
   03/17/04  House  Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Viers,
                     Chellis, Clark, G.R.Smith
   03/17/04  House  Amended HJ-29
   03/17/04  House  Read second time HJ-38
   03/17/04  House  Roll call Yeas-103  Nays-7 HJ-38
   03/18/04  House  Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-24
   03/18/04  Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-17
   03/18/04  Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-17
   05/13/04  Senate Recalled from Committee on Judiciary SJ-38

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

RECALLED

May 13, 2004

H. 4657

Introduced by Reps. Haskins, Pinson, Duncan, Vaughn, Altman, Dantzler, Davenport, Hamilton, Leach, M.A. Pitts, Taylor, Walker, Wilkins, Young, Mahaffey, Coates, Bingham, Chellis, E.H. Pitts, Sandifer, G.M. Smith, Talley, Viers, Whitmire, Toole, G.R. Smith, Simrill, Rice, Owens, Hagood and Clark

S. Printed 5/13/04--S.

Read the first time March 18, 2004.

TO AMEND SECTION 20-1-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT SAME SEX MARRIAGES IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION HAS NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS STATE; AND TO ADD SECTION 20-1-17 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IT IS AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY TO EXTEND OR RECOGNIZE STATUTORY BENEFITS OF A LEGAL MARRIAGE TO NONMARITAL RELATIONSHIPS AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE THAT ANY PUBLIC ACT, RECORD, OR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING OF THIS STATE THAT EXTENDS SUCH BENEFITS TO NONMARITAL RELATIONSHIPS HAS NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS STATE, TO PROVIDE EXCEPTIONS FOR BENEFITS ENJOYED BY ALL PERSONS, MARRIED OR UNMARRIED, AND FOR PRIVATE AGREEMENTS VALID UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE, AND TO PROVIDE THAT BENEFITS OF A LEGAL MARRIAGE EXTENDED TO NONMARITAL RELATIONSHIPS IN ANOTHER JURISDICTION HAVE NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT IN THIS STATE.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Section 20-1-15 of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 327 of 1996, is amended to read:

"Section 20-1-15.    (A)    A marriage Any attempted or putative union between persons of the same sex is void ab initio and against the public policy of this State.

(B)    Public acts, records, judicial proceedings, licenses issued by another jurisdiction in contravention of subsection (A), or any other governmental recognition are of no legal force or effect, void ab initio, and will not be recognized by this State or its political subdivisions in accordance with the strong public policy of South Carolina.

(C)    Marriage in this State and its political subdivisions is exclusively defined as a union between one man and one woman."

SECTION    2.    Article 1, Chapter 1, Title 20 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 20-1-17.    (A)    The recognition or extension by this State or its political subdivisions of the specific statutory benefits of a legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is against the strong public policy of this State and its political subdivisions. Any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of this State or its political subdivisions that extends the specific statutory benefits of legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is void ab initio. Nothing in this subsection may be construed to:

(1)    prohibit the extension of specific benefits otherwise enjoyed by all persons, married or unmarried, to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes, including the extension of benefits conferred by any statute that is not expressly limited to married persons;

(2)    affect the validity of private agreements that are otherwise valid under the laws of this State.

(B)    any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other state, country, or other jurisdiction outside this State that extends the specific benefits of legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes must be considered and treated in all respects as having no legal force or effect in this State or its political subdivisions and must not be recognized by this State or its political subdivisions."

SECTION    3.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.